to view Short Range Transit Plan FY 2007/2008 - Tri Delta Transit

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 3.4 Subsidy Per Passenger Trends$5.00$4.50$4.00$3.50$3.00$2.50$2.00$1.50$1.00$0.50$0.001994-951995-961996-971997-981998-991999-002000-012001-022002-032003-042004-052005-062006-07Subsidy Per PassengerTri Delta Transit introduced an all-day pass fare instrument effectiveJanuary 2007, replacing the previous system of bus-to-bus transferswhile retaining the BART to bus transfer. See Table 3.4 whichsummarizes total usage of each fare instrument (not revenues). Thisresulted in a 20.6% reduction in the use of adult cash fares, and a26.0% decline in senior/disabled cash fare instrument use. FromJanuary to June 2007, almost 300,000 riders used the day pass, anddramatic jumps in usage of prepaid punch passes which increased from118% to 157%. Use of BART to bus transfers increased 56% whilebus-to-bus transfer usage declined 30%. Transfers from BART accountfor 8.5% of total boardings; this implies total bus ridership to and fromBART is approximately 20% of daily Tri Delta Transit patronage.Table 3.4 Passengers by Type Fare Paid, FY 2003-04 vs. FY 2006-07FY 2003-04 FY 2006-07PaymentType Fare TypeTotalPassengers PercentTotalPassengers PercentChange inProportionCash Adult 1,190,032 52.7% 1,045,740 41.8% -20.6%Full Fare Day Pass 0 0.0% 141,659 5.7% n/aSenior/Disabled 167,957 7.4% 137,627 5.5% -26.0%S/D Day pass 0 0.0% 27,731 1.1% n/aBART Transfer 123,479 5.5% 213,366 8.5% 56.0%Special 271,169 12.0% 23,335 0.9% -92.2%Subtotal 1,752,637 77.6% 1,589,458 63.6% -18.1%Prepaid Adult Punch 192,330 8.5% 465,140 18.6% 118.4%S/D Punch 26,323 1.2% 75,037 3.0% 157.4%Subtotal 218,653 9.7% 540,177 21.6% 123.1%Zero Fare 72,012 3.2% 205,148 8.2% 157.2%Bus Transfer 215,029 9.5% 166,147 6.6% -30.2%Subtotal 287,041 12.7% 371,295 14.8% 16.8%TOTAL 2,258,331 100.0% 2,500,930 100.0% 0.0%32
Individual Fixed Route PerformancePerformance by individual fixed route for FY 2003-04 is summarized inTable 3.5; FY 2006-07 is summarized in Table 3.6.Figure 3.5 below compares the average productivity in boardings(passengers) per revenue vehicle hour (RVH for Tri Delta Transitroutes for both FY 2003-04 and 2006-07. In FY 2003-04, systemproductivity averaged 14.4 boardings/RVH and 15.5 boardings/RVH inFY 2006-07. Route 300 was the best performing express route witharound 13 boardings/RVH in FY 2006-07; Route 200 to Martinezaveraged about 7.3 boardings/RVH, a slight improvement from FY2003-04. DX-1 and DX-2 averaged 9.6 and 6.6 boardings/RVH,respectively. Special shuttles and 49er shuttles also had relatively goodperformance. No service was provided on the new Delta Express routeto Martinez and Route 201, the latter which began August 26, 2007during FY 2007-08.All local routes except Route 70 and Saturday Route 393 improvedtheir performance in FY 2006-07 compared to FY 2003-04. As a result,service on Route 70 was reduced somewhat, and Saturday service onthe Brentwood Dimes-A-Ride was discontinued completely due to lowproductivity.Since FY 2003-04, Tri Delta Transit began operation of four newroutes, 384, 385, and 386 on weekdays, and new route 394 onSaturdays and Sundays. Routes 384 and 385 are community shuttleroutes covering Southeast Antioch and Brentwood; Route 386 is a“lifeline” route connecting Discovery Bay and Brentwood. Given thesprawling low density, affluent suburban nature of this area and manyvacant parcels of land still to be developed, the relatively lowproductivity of Routes 384 and 385 (6.2 and 9.4 boardings/RVH,respectively) is to be expected. Patronage on both routes is expectedto mature over the next few years as the area continues to developFigure 3.5 Route Productivity, FY 2003-04 and FY 2006-073025Boardings Per RVH20151050DXDX-1DX-2200300Shuttles7020133BDR380383384FY 2003-04 FY 2006-07385386387388389390391Sat-BDRSat-392Sat-393Sat-394Sun-392Sun-393Sun-394
Page 1: Short Range Transit PlanFY 2007/08
Page 9 and 10: List of TablesTable 1.1 ECCTA Servi
Page 11 and 12: Executive SummaryChapter One of thi
Page 13 and 14: Introduction & OverviewCHAPTER1Purp
Page 15 and 16: Table 1.1 ECCTA Service Area Popula
Page 17 and 18: For purposes of discussions relativ
Page 19 and 20: Commute & Other Travel PatternsAs p
Page 21 and 22: This data is presented in Table 1.4
Page 23 and 24: • Marketing and Operations Commit
Page 25 and 26: Figure 1.2a. Tri Delta Transit Rout
Page 27 and 28: Route 200 -Martinez/Pittsburg links
Page 29 and 30: ECCTA Dial-a-RideDial-a-Ride is the
Page 31 and 32: Fare StructureThe ECCTA Board of Di
Page 33 and 34: ModelYearNumberFixed RouteTable 1.7
Page 35 and 36: Goals, Objectives & StandardsBackgr
Page 37 and 38: Table 2.2 Summary of ECCTA Objectiv
Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER3System & Service Evaluation
Page 41 and 42: DestinationsTotalBoardingsTotalRVHE
Page 43: In FY 2002-03, increases in unit op
Page 49 and 50: The best performing local routes du
Page 51 and 52: Figure 3.7 DAR Total Boardings, FY
Page 53 and 54: Dial-A-Ride/Paratransit Trends by T
Page 55 and 56: City of Antioch. The farebox cost r
Page 57 and 58: DAR Evaluation SummaryTri Delta Tra
Page 59 and 60: The Brentwood park-ride lot is phys
Page 61 and 62: Each completed survey provides info
Page 63 and 64: Those aged 12 to 30 constitute 60%
Page 65 and 66: Most transit users (77%) ride the b
Page 67 and 68: Figure 3.21 shows in another way th
Page 69 and 70: MTC Sponsored Survey, February 2007
Page 71 and 72: the adopted productivity standard,
Page 73 and 74: Federal Title VI ProgramECCTA has e
Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER4Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Opt
Page 77 and 78: While left-hand doors reduce EmX ve
Page 79 and 80: According to the FTA report “Las
Page 81 and 82: Figure 4.9 Typical MAX StationEach
Page 83 and 84: Figure 4.12 Orange Line BRT Vehicle
Page 85 and 86: The Bus way has suffered from many
Page 87 and 88: Figure 4.17 Pittsburgh South Bus wa
Page 89 and 90: Mixed traffic BRT routes with trans
Page 91 and 92: Figure 4.19 Tri Delta Transit Fixed
Page 93 and 94: to the proposed Railroad Avenue and
Page 95 and 96:
Figure 4.21 Elevated BRT Station Co
Page 97 and 98:
CHAPTER5Operations Plan and BudgetT
Page 99 and 100:
Transit ChallengesTri Delta Transit
Page 101 and 102:
Another potential opportunity for i
Page 103 and 104:
The orig inal eBART proposal would
Page 105 and 106:
Based on the principles listed abov
Page 107 and 108:
Future Tri Delta Transit route revi
Page 112 and 113:
100
Page 114 and 115:
Table 6.1 ECCTA Planned CapitalPrio
Page 116 and 117:
Capital Project DetailsFR Fleet Enh
Page 118 and 119:
AppendixRESOLUTION #080123cBay Area
Page 120 and 121:
Goals1. Everyone in the Bay Region
show all

to view Short Range Transit Plan FY 2007/2008 - Tri Delta Transit

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?