11.07.2015 Views

Copyright 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

where e F = e F ieV and e F F = e x F F ie y F . Substituting Eq. (31) into Eq. (24), weobtain the relative values of the optical transition probability to/from theexciton state having the total angular momentum projection F coursed <strong>by</strong> theabsorption/emission of the r F polarized light.For the exciton state with F = 0, we obtainP U;L0ðr F Þ ¼ jh0je F pˆb jC ˜ U;L0ij 2 ¼ je F z h0jpˆzj˜CU;L0ij 2¼ ðe 2 z þ eV2 z ÞNU;L 0¼ N U;L0sin 2 ðhÞ ð32Þwhere h is the angle between the crystal hexagonal axis and the light propagationdirection. In deriving Eq. (32), we used the identity for three orthogonalvectors (e, eV, and c): cos 2 (h e ) + cos 2 (h e V) + cos 2 (h) = 1, where h e and h e V are theangles between the crystal hexagonal axis and the vectors e and eV, respectively.One can see from Eq. (32) that the excitation probability of the upper (+) F = 0state does not depend on the NC size, and that for the lower state ( ), it isidentically equal to zero. The lower F = 0 exciton state is always opticallypassive.For the exciton states with F = +1, we obtainP U;LF¼1 ðrF Þ ¼ jh0je b pˆF jC ˜ U;L1i 2 ¼ 1 4 jeb h0jpˆþ jC ˜ U;L1ij 2¼ 1 4 je bieV j 2 N U;L1¼ N U;L1ð1Fcos hÞ 2 ð33ÞSimilar calculations yield the following expression for the excitation probabilityof the F = 1 state:P U;LF¼1 ðrF Þ ¼ N U;L1ð1bcos hÞ 2 ð34ÞDeriving Eqs. (33) and (34), we used the orthogonality condition (ec) = 0. In azero magnetic field, the exciton states F = 1 and F = 1 are degenerate andwe cannot distinguish them in a system of randomly oriented crystals.To find the probability of exciton excitation for a system of randomlyoriented NCs, we average Eqs. (26) and (28) over all possible solid angles. Therespective excitation probabilities are proportional toP L 0 ¼ 0; PU 0 ¼ NU 03 ;P L 1 ¼ PL 1 ¼ 2NL 13 ; PU 1 ¼ PU 1 ¼ 2NU 13ð35ÞThere are three optically active states with relative oscillator strengths P0 U,2P1 U, and 2PL 1 . The size dependence of these strengths for different NC shapesis shown in Fig. 4 for hexagonal CdSe nanoparticles. It is seen that the NC<strong>Copyright</strong> <strong>2004</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Marcel</strong> <strong>Dekker</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. <strong>All</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Reserved</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!