11.07.2015 Views

Copyright 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

electron relaxation is inhibited and the relaxation time increases. Thus, in theabove experiments, the slow 200-ps component is attributed to the phononbottleneck, most prominent in pyridine-capped CdSe QDs, whereas the fast1–2-ps component reflects the Auger relaxation process. The relative weightof these two processes in a given QD system depends on the hole trappingdynamics of the molecules surrounding the QD.Klimov et al. further studied carrier relaxation dynamics in CdSe QDsand published a series of articles on the results [129,132]; a review of this workwas also recently published [133]. These studies also strongly support thepresence of the Auger mechanism for carrier relaxation in QDs. The experimentswere done using ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy with either two orthree beams. In the former, the QDs were pumped with visible light across itsbandgap (hole states to electron states) to produce excited-state (i.e., hot)electrons; the electron relaxation was monitored <strong>by</strong> probing the bleachingdynamics of the resonant HOMO to LUMO transition with visible light or <strong>by</strong>probing the transient IR absorption of the 1S to 1P intraband transition,which reflects the dynamics of electron occupancy in the LUMO state of theQD. The three-beam experiment was similar to that of Guyot-Sionnest et al.[95], except that the probe in the experiments of Klimov et al. is a white-lightcontinuum. The first pump beam is at 3 eV and creates electrons and holesacross the QD bandgap. The second beam is in the IR and is delayed withrespect to the optical pump; this beam repumps electrons that have relaxed tothe LUMO back up in energy. Finally, the third beam is a broadband whitelightcontinuum probe that monitors photoinduced interband absorptionchanges over the range 1.2–3 eV. The experiments were done with twodifferent caps on the QDs: a ZnS cap and a pyridine cap. The results showedthat with the ZnS-capped CdSe, the relaxation time from the 1P to the 1S statewas about 250 fs, whereas for the pyridine-capped CdSe, the relaxation timeincreased to 3 ps. The increase in the latter experiment was attributed to aphonon bottleneck produced <strong>by</strong> rapid hole trapping <strong>by</strong> the pyridine, as alsoproposed <strong>by</strong> Guyot-Sionnest et al. [95]. However, the timescale of the phononbottleneck induced <strong>by</strong> hole trapping <strong>by</strong> pyridine caps on CdSe that werereported <strong>by</strong> Klimov et al. was not as great as that reported <strong>by</strong> Guyot-Sionnestet al. [95].Similar studies of carrier dynamics have been made on InP QDs [75,130,131]. It was found that whereas the electron relaxation time from the 1P to the1S state was 350–450 fs for the cases where the photogenerated electrons andholes were confined to the core of a 42-A˚ InP QD, this relaxation timeincreases <strong>by</strong> about an order of magnitude to 3–4 ps when the hole was trappedat the surface <strong>by</strong> an effective hole trap such as sodium biphenyl. These resultsare consistent with the conclusion derived from studies of CdSe QDs that thephonon bottleneck is <strong>by</strong>passed <strong>by</strong> an Auger cooling process, but if the Auger<strong>Copyright</strong> <strong>2004</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Marcel</strong> <strong>Dekker</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. <strong>All</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Reserved</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!