149We can now temporarily observe that the technological networks have structurally increasedthe degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>nectivity am<strong>on</strong>g organisati<strong>on</strong>s and this has clearly changed the project <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theorganisati<strong>on</strong>s we are involved in.«A universe is born when a space is cut in two» 63. Cyberspace is always a social spaceAt this point we should not incur in the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> doing bad sociology. Already <strong>on</strong> an intuiti<strong>on</strong>level it seems clear, as Fernando Flores observes, that «Cyberspace is always a social space» 7 .However we must avoid being generic and the soluti<strong>on</strong> should not be seek in a generic ‘infosocio-psycho-matics’.We must, instead, have a sufficiently rigorous model that can guide us in theproject design.Let’s now preliminarily give a definiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> language and its functi<strong>on</strong>:«… the fundamental functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> language as a system <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> oriented behaviours is not the transmissi<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> informati<strong>on</strong> or the descripti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an independent universe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which we can speak <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>, but ratherthe creati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a c<strong>on</strong>sensual behaviour domain am<strong>on</strong>g systems that linguistically interact throughthe development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a cooperative domain <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interacti<strong>on</strong>s.» 8This means to understand that in the human language no banally educati<strong>on</strong>al interacti<strong>on</strong>s arepossible, but its communicati<strong>on</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>ing origins from the creati<strong>on</strong>/c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, throughrecurred interacti<strong>on</strong>s am<strong>on</strong>g pers<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a c<strong>on</strong>sensual domain 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interacti<strong>on</strong>s that cannot bereduced to the physical domain nor to the interacti<strong>on</strong> domain if separately seen. Its functi<strong>on</strong>ing isthe result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a ‘entrenched’ 10 history <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> linguistic behaviours.«Language, as a c<strong>on</strong>sensual domain, is patterning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ‘mutual orienting behavior’, not a collecti<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mechanism in a ‘language user’ or a ‘semantic’ coupling’ between linguistic behavior and n<strong>on</strong>linguisticperturbati<strong>on</strong>s experienced by organism … language is c<strong>on</strong>notative and not denotative,and that its functi<strong>on</strong> is to orient the orientee within his or here cognitive domain, and not to pointto independent entities.» 11Accordingly, the project designing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hardware, protocols and applicati<strong>on</strong>s in a network c<strong>on</strong>text isno l<strong>on</strong>ger designing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> processes that creates the organisati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which the technological network,the applicati<strong>on</strong>s, the protocols and ourselves are part.6 Humberto R. Maturana - Francisco J. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cogniti<strong>on</strong>: The Realizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Living, Kluwer AcademicPublishers, 1980.7 Fernando Flores, The Impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Informati<strong>on</strong> Technology <strong>on</strong> Business, Address to the 50th Anniversary C<strong>on</strong>ference <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theAssociati<strong>on</strong> for Computing Machinery (ACM97), mimeo, 19978 Humberto R. Maturana, «Biology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cogniti<strong>on</strong>» (1970), in Humberto R. Maturana - Francisco J. Varela, Autopoiesis andCogniti<strong>on</strong>: The Realizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Living, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1980.9 See for the meaning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>sensual Domain: Humberto R. Maturana - Francisco J. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cogniti<strong>on</strong>: TheRealizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Living, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1980 and, Humberto R. Maturana - Francisco J. Varela, The Tree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Knowledge: The Biological Roots <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Human Understanding, Shambhala Publicati<strong>on</strong>s, 1992.10 For the meaning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ‘entrenched’ cf: Nels<strong>on</strong> Goodman, Fact, Fincti<strong>on</strong> and forecast, The Bobbs-Merryl Company Inc., 197311 Terry Winograd - Fernando Flores, Understanding Computers and Cogniti<strong>on</strong>. A New Foundati<strong>on</strong> for Design, Ablex PublishingCorporati<strong>on</strong>, 1986.
150«…from this perspective the communicati<strong>on</strong> activity does not represent the informati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>veyancebetween transmitter and recipient, but is rather the communicati<strong>on</strong> itself that becomes the mutualcreati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a comm<strong>on</strong> universe, through the combined acti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the two actors: we formulate ouruniverse in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> existence as a social acti<strong>on</strong>. There are some language dimensi<strong>on</strong>s throughwhich this social ‘bringing forth’ happens. These are the linguistic acti<strong>on</strong>s that we c<strong>on</strong>tinuouslycarry out: statements, promises, requests and declarati<strong>on</strong>s. In fact, such a network <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> usualspeeches, with their satisfacti<strong>on</strong> requirements, is not a communicati<strong>on</strong> tool but the real plot throughwhich we are defined as individuals.» 12Our efforts are not directed to the attempt <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> developing an IT applicati<strong>on</strong> that provides a predeterminedset <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> appropriate output but a group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supports that extends and empowers theorganisati<strong>on</strong>s effectiveness, organisati<strong>on</strong>s meaning a c<strong>on</strong>sensual domain generated in humanlanguage. It is clear how this perspective changes the objective <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> IT project design.The tools we design come from this approach 13 . We do not simply tend to automatize a humanactivity but we tend to integrate different tools with the aim <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> improving and make more effectivethe increase <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> social c<strong>on</strong>nectivity generated by the technological networks.This approach goes bey<strong>on</strong>d the interesting groupware, workflow, knowledge management 14technologies; it is not about thinking an applicati<strong>on</strong> that ‘automatizes’ something, but it is aboutdesigning the social (linguistic) process network that c<strong>on</strong>stitute the organisati<strong>on</strong>s in which we areinvolved. On the Internet, this has actually happened in a sp<strong>on</strong>taneous fashi<strong>on</strong>, by making wholefamilies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> protocols and applicati<strong>on</strong>s such as e-mail (smtp, pop3, imap), newsgroups (NNTP),Internet Relay Chat, File Transfer Protocol, etc.However, there is no cultural and organisati<strong>on</strong>al awareness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> what has socially emerged and thereis no ability to see how the applicati<strong>on</strong>s design and implementati<strong>on</strong> are a direct and inherent part<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the organisati<strong>on</strong>al project.«… the domain created by a design is a domain which people live.» 154. Rethinking the organisati<strong>on</strong>sTraditi<strong>on</strong>al organisati<strong>on</strong>s were and are trivial machines. Inside them even the human participantwas substantially seen as a machine that carries out pre-coded indicati<strong>on</strong>s. Even the <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice wassubstantially seen like a Fordist assembly line.The job in this clerical type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>text has a low aut<strong>on</strong>omy: in case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> problems during the carryingout <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the job, the decisi<strong>on</strong> (if not in the ambit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pre-coded cases) goes <strong>on</strong>to the higher hierarchicallevel. The cultural habit allowed the fact that even n<strong>on</strong> clerical jobs have been put in organisati<strong>on</strong>sdesigned with a substantially hierarchical-bureaucratic basis.12 Francisco Varela, Scienza e tecnologia della cognizi<strong>on</strong>e, Hopefulm<strong>on</strong>ster, 198713See: www.brainworkers.net14 For an in-depth analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Knowledge management cf. chapter 5.15 Terry Winograd - Fernando Flores, Understanding Computers Cogniti<strong>on</strong>. A New Foundati<strong>on</strong> for Desing, Ablex PublishingCorporati<strong>on</strong>, 1986.
- Page 3:
4PREFACENew ways of</strong
- Page 7 and 8:
8PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSI Gl
- Page 10 and 11:
11PLENARY SESSION PRESENTATIONSI St
- Page 12 and 13:
13Learning and organizational devel
- Page 14 and 15:
15The New Policy Agenda for eWork i
- Page 16:
17eWork has also emerged as a key f
- Page 19 and 20:
20Telework and local entrepreneursh
- Page 21 and 22:
22involves interaction and planning
- Page 24 and 25:
25The Green Paper is also addressin
- Page 26 and 27:
27Information society, Globalisatio
- Page 28 and 29:
29The European Uni
- Page 30 and 31:
31The Commission paperThe Commissio
- Page 32 and 33:
33Summary from EPRI meeting 1Jouni
- Page 34 and 35:
35It was agreed that online access
- Page 36 and 37:
37Professor Turkka
- Page 38 and 39:
39Delegations from 24 Europ
- Page 40 and 41:
41ConclusionsMatti Salmenperä, Dir
- Page 42:
43The role of tech
- Page 45 and 46:
46e-Work in Europe - Indicators for
- Page 47 and 48:
48The results from the ECaTT projec
- Page 49 and 50:
50According to our forecasts using
- Page 51 and 52:
52In general, the transition from t
- Page 53 and 54:
54market adaptablity (in the EC und
- Page 55 and 56:
56Tele-cooperation is already widel
- Page 57 and 58:
58As Table 7 shows, overall self-em
- Page 59 and 60:
60the traditional view of</
- Page 61 and 62:
62Figure 4:Adaptability of<
- Page 63 and 64:
646. Summary and ConclusionsThe pre
- Page 65 and 66:
66Virtual work in a real worldUrsul
- Page 67 and 68:
68Still more misleading is the assu
- Page 69 and 70:
70what, then, has changed?Any analy
- Page 71 and 72:
72Preliminary results of</s
- Page 73 and 74:
74Figure 3:eWork demand in Europe,
- Page 75 and 76:
76As can be seen, by far the most c
- Page 77 and 78:
78Information Security in E-workArt
- Page 79 and 80:
803. The impact of
- Page 81 and 82:
82Accommodating the new economy:The
- Page 83 and 84:
84With distributed workforces only
- Page 85 and 86:
86As the level of
- Page 87 and 88:
885. SANE future research tasksThe
- Page 89 and 90:
90Awareness: For fluent distributed
- Page 91 and 92:
92On a 17” screen the user is abl
- Page 94 and 95:
95PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSI G
- Page 96 and 97:
972. The set of VI
- Page 98 and 99: 99What is global e-Work?E-work is w
- Page 100 and 101: 101Contribution to progress in the
- Page 102 and 103: 103Most relevant: The unprecedented
- Page 104 and 105: 105PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSII
- Page 106 and 107: 107The Siemens CaseSiemens Finland
- Page 108 and 109: 109Challenges of v
- Page 110 and 111: 111Teleware’s combination trainin
- Page 112 and 113: 113PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSII
- Page 114 and 115: 115Towns should regain their anothe
- Page 116 and 117: 117In order to be successful, devel
- Page 118 and 119: 119The Models of I
- Page 120 and 121: 121Table 1.Telework implementation
- Page 122 and 123: 123of threats in o
- Page 124 and 125: 125Fig.3.Level of
- Page 126 and 127: 127Telework is applied in Poland in
- Page 128 and 129: 129The first area is strictly conne
- Page 130 and 131: 131Awareness of Te
- Page 132 and 133: 133work more effective, producing h
- Page 134 and 135: 135Conferences on Telework in Budap
- Page 136 and 137: 137Telecommunication services penet
- Page 138 and 139: 139Look at World (in Estonian: Vaat
- Page 140 and 141: 141Aim of project
- Page 142 and 143: 143PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSIV
- Page 144 and 145: 145There seems to be a vicious circ
- Page 146 and 147: 147netOrganisationStefano Lotti, CE
- Page 150 and 151: 151On the other hand, the presence
- Page 152 and 153: 153The possibility to access an org
- Page 154 and 155: 1556. Some wishes, to replace concl
- Page 156 and 157: 157PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSV
- Page 158 and 159: 159This paper looks first at how eL
- Page 160 and 161: 161Figure 1:Lead operators and free
- Page 162 and 163: 163Table 1:Online work exchange mar
- Page 164 and 165: 165Table 2:Tele-cooperation in Euro
- Page 166 and 167: 1675 ConclusionsMalone and Laubache
- Page 168 and 169: 169Home Telework As A Key Action To
- Page 170 and 171: 171a structured questionnaire, and
- Page 172 and 173: 1735. Telework Eight Months LaterDu
- Page 174 and 175: 175In both the surveys, the workers
- Page 176 and 177: 177represented an important variabl
- Page 178 and 179: 179The work deprived were the secon
- Page 180 and 181: 181divide and blur lines between wo
- Page 182 and 183: 183PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSVI
- Page 184 and 185: 185Since technological reason in ge
- Page 186 and 187: 187The main exception at the moment
- Page 188 and 189: 189Claussen 2001) , the few bigger
- Page 190 and 191: 191ReferencesAlasoini. T. and Kyll
- Page 192 and 193: 193IntroductionThe ongoing economic
- Page 194 and 195: 195Building on former programmesThe
- Page 196 and 197: 197Therefore, it seems essential th
- Page 198 and 199:
NotesBaethge, Martin (1999): Transf
- Page 200 and 201:
201organizations, R&D institutes, a
- Page 202 and 203:
203Challenges for Programmatic Work
- Page 204 and 205:
205different kinds of</stro
- Page 206 and 207:
207PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSVI
- Page 208 and 209:
209Development Cooperation
- Page 210 and 211:
211How to fi nd work tasks?There is
- Page 212 and 213:
213IntroductionEco-Managed eWork as
- Page 214 and 215:
215In a recent survey by the Helsin
- Page 216 and 217:
217The experiment is connected with
- Page 218 and 219:
219their interest in returning to t
- Page 220 and 221:
221businesses, have access to the v
- Page 222 and 223:
223Short summaries of</stro
- Page 224 and 225:
225As a result of
- Page 226 and 227:
227PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSVI
- Page 228 and 229:
229The knowledge economy is not <st
- Page 230 and 231:
231PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSIX
- Page 232 and 233:
233The paper of Sh
- Page 234 and 235:
In total, the conference once again
- Page 236 and 237:
237Appendix AE -WORK 2001 Conferenc
- Page 238 and 239:
239Year 2002 conferenceParallel ses
- Page 240 and 241:
2417. Community developments15.00 -
- Page 242 and 243:
243Appendix CList of</stron
- Page 244 and 245:
245Harle Bob European</stro
- Page 246 and 247:
247Koivusalo Salla Helsinki Univers
- Page 248 and 249:
249Mustikkamäki Nina University Of
- Page 250 and 251:
251Sajavaara AnuEmployers’ Associ
- Page 252 and 253:
253Wasinger Walter Informations-Tec
- Page 254 and 255:
255