12.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of 8th European Assembly on telework (Telework2001)

Proceedings of 8th European Assembly on telework (Telework2001)

Proceedings of 8th European Assembly on telework (Telework2001)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

151On the other hand, the presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> technological networks implies an increase in the knowledgeworker’s aut<strong>on</strong>omy/independence. He/she has to make decisi<strong>on</strong>s being able to rapidly c<strong>on</strong>sult his/her co-operati<strong>on</strong> network (team, working groups, suppliers) with no need to involve a hierarchicalescalati<strong>on</strong>. That hierarchy that is useful to keep together large organisati<strong>on</strong>s with a low c<strong>on</strong>nectivitylevel, here becomes a cultural and cybernetic obstacle for the organisati<strong>on</strong> efficacy.It is clear how the work organisati<strong>on</strong> design can no l<strong>on</strong>ger be set aside the technologicalinfrastructure that reduces the coordinati<strong>on</strong> costs. The infrastructure is not simply a service for theorganisati<strong>on</strong>: it is its ‘alive’ skelet<strong>on</strong>, an inherent part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its reproducti<strong>on</strong> processes. The design<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the electr<strong>on</strong>ic work envir<strong>on</strong>ment must be able to be part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the “biological” upcoming <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>communicati<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>trol processes. We can now synthesise some points for this designing:• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must c<strong>on</strong>nect in a single space all the knowledge workers involved in thespecific shared domain. This means that, in a transparent fashi<strong>on</strong>, the envir<strong>on</strong>ment c<strong>on</strong>sists inthe c<strong>on</strong>sensual domain in which the people are, time by time, involved• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must provide both real time (i.e. chat, whiteboard, audio/videocommunicati<strong>on</strong>etc.) and asynchr<strong>on</strong>ic communicati<strong>on</strong>s tools (e-mail, newsgroup, broadcast messages).• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must provide the possibility to share domain interrelated documents bymanaging ownership functi<strong>on</strong>s for in-progress files, up to versi<strong>on</strong>ing managing, depending <strong>on</strong>the specific needs.• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must have functi<strong>on</strong>s that support the group coordinati<strong>on</strong> by favouring theflexible management <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> appointments and working processes.• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must allow the browsing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> past files and process• The exit from the envir<strong>on</strong>ment must coincide with the exit from the c<strong>on</strong>sensual domainAn envir<strong>on</strong>ment that meets the above basic requirements allows to access all the communicati<strong>on</strong>related to a domain therefore generating a Collaboratory. The project design <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this infrastructureis not the making <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a traditi<strong>on</strong>al s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware applicati<strong>on</strong> but rather it is the design <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a cooperati<strong>on</strong>network through an electr<strong>on</strong>ic envir<strong>on</strong>ment. The traditi<strong>on</strong>al idea <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two different project design<strong>on</strong>e for IT and <strong>on</strong>e for the organisati<strong>on</strong> has become a cultural obstacle against the networkpossibilities.«“You see it, d<strong>on</strong>’t you? …!” Well, this is the typical way <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expressing<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some<strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>strained by a rule.» 165. Knowledge management: an ambiguous ideaIn the organisati<strong>on</strong> ambit the issue <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge is particularly crucial. It becomes central in anyc<strong>on</strong>text that enables language-based producti<strong>on</strong> processes supported by technological systems; inother words, where the interacti<strong>on</strong> happens through communicati<strong>on</strong> flows, followed by the making<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a product, an event, a s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware, a certificate and so <strong>on</strong>.A knowledge management system should allow an organisati<strong>on</strong>, to manage its experiences,processes, informati<strong>on</strong> to make them available to its human resources, project teams, to those whohave to cope and solve problems. Accordingly, a knowledge management system can be seen asa method that drives the human resources to share their experience/know-how deriving from the16 Ludwing Wittgenstein, Ricerche fi los<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>i che, Einaudi, 1967

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!