151On the other hand, the presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> technological networks implies an increase in the knowledgeworker’s aut<strong>on</strong>omy/independence. He/she has to make decisi<strong>on</strong>s being able to rapidly c<strong>on</strong>sult his/her co-operati<strong>on</strong> network (team, working groups, suppliers) with no need to involve a hierarchicalescalati<strong>on</strong>. That hierarchy that is useful to keep together large organisati<strong>on</strong>s with a low c<strong>on</strong>nectivitylevel, here becomes a cultural and cybernetic obstacle for the organisati<strong>on</strong> efficacy.It is clear how the work organisati<strong>on</strong> design can no l<strong>on</strong>ger be set aside the technologicalinfrastructure that reduces the coordinati<strong>on</strong> costs. The infrastructure is not simply a service for theorganisati<strong>on</strong>: it is its ‘alive’ skelet<strong>on</strong>, an inherent part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its reproducti<strong>on</strong> processes. The design<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the electr<strong>on</strong>ic work envir<strong>on</strong>ment must be able to be part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the “biological” upcoming <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>communicati<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>trol processes. We can now synthesise some points for this designing:• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must c<strong>on</strong>nect in a single space all the knowledge workers involved in thespecific shared domain. This means that, in a transparent fashi<strong>on</strong>, the envir<strong>on</strong>ment c<strong>on</strong>sists inthe c<strong>on</strong>sensual domain in which the people are, time by time, involved• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must provide both real time (i.e. chat, whiteboard, audio/videocommunicati<strong>on</strong>etc.) and asynchr<strong>on</strong>ic communicati<strong>on</strong>s tools (e-mail, newsgroup, broadcast messages).• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must provide the possibility to share domain interrelated documents bymanaging ownership functi<strong>on</strong>s for in-progress files, up to versi<strong>on</strong>ing managing, depending <strong>on</strong>the specific needs.• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must have functi<strong>on</strong>s that support the group coordinati<strong>on</strong> by favouring theflexible management <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> appointments and working processes.• The envir<strong>on</strong>ment must allow the browsing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> past files and process• The exit from the envir<strong>on</strong>ment must coincide with the exit from the c<strong>on</strong>sensual domainAn envir<strong>on</strong>ment that meets the above basic requirements allows to access all the communicati<strong>on</strong>related to a domain therefore generating a Collaboratory. The project design <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this infrastructureis not the making <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a traditi<strong>on</strong>al s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware applicati<strong>on</strong> but rather it is the design <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a cooperati<strong>on</strong>network through an electr<strong>on</strong>ic envir<strong>on</strong>ment. The traditi<strong>on</strong>al idea <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two different project design<strong>on</strong>e for IT and <strong>on</strong>e for the organisati<strong>on</strong> has become a cultural obstacle against the networkpossibilities.«“You see it, d<strong>on</strong>’t you? …!” Well, this is the typical way <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expressing<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some<strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>strained by a rule.» 165. Knowledge management: an ambiguous ideaIn the organisati<strong>on</strong> ambit the issue <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge is particularly crucial. It becomes central in anyc<strong>on</strong>text that enables language-based producti<strong>on</strong> processes supported by technological systems; inother words, where the interacti<strong>on</strong> happens through communicati<strong>on</strong> flows, followed by the making<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a product, an event, a s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware, a certificate and so <strong>on</strong>.A knowledge management system should allow an organisati<strong>on</strong>, to manage its experiences,processes, informati<strong>on</strong> to make them available to its human resources, project teams, to those whohave to cope and solve problems. Accordingly, a knowledge management system can be seen asa method that drives the human resources to share their experience/know-how deriving from the16 Ludwing Wittgenstein, Ricerche fi los<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>i che, Einaudi, 1967
152carrying out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their job, the relati<strong>on</strong>ships developed, the pers<strong>on</strong>al educati<strong>on</strong> processes, and theextra-work linguistic cooperati<strong>on</strong>, in a comm<strong>on</strong> space where every<strong>on</strong>e can freely access.In its classic definiti<strong>on</strong>, knowledge management is a virtuous cycle in which knowledge goesthrough different phases: initially it is an implicit form, after it is socialised and made explicit byits outing and recombinati<strong>on</strong>, then becomes shared heritage in an organisati<strong>on</strong>, and then goes backin an implicit shape during the interiorisati<strong>on</strong> phase.However the meaning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge management is structurally equivocal:«… ‘informati<strong>on</strong>’ and knowledge are now tenaciously c<strong>on</strong>sidered as market goods. Informati<strong>on</strong>is, obviously, that process through which <strong>on</strong>e acquires some knowledge and knowledge c<strong>on</strong>sists inthose processes that integrate past and present experiences in order to make new activities happen,either in the shape <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> neur<strong>on</strong> activity internally perceived such as a thought and a will or in theshape <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> externally perceivable activity such as language and movement.N<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the above two processes can be ‘transmitted’ as sentences like: “Universities arerepositories <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge that is transmitted from a generati<strong>on</strong> to another”, etc, would suggest,because your neur<strong>on</strong> activity is simply your neur<strong>on</strong> activity and, unfortunately, not mine.» 17Therefore, knowledge is not an object and actually the term ‘knowledge management’ is ambiguous.Knowledge is simply the adequate acting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a system. For ‘adequate acting’ we simply meanthe keeping <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its identity within the domain in which the system is placed. The upcoming<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an organisati<strong>on</strong> adequate behaviour looks like that Moliére’s BourgeoisGentilhomme who “finds out ” he speaks in “prose”. Knowledge management is not the discovery<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a new object to manage but the discovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the basic organisati<strong>on</strong> activity that in the past washidden behind the hierarchical model rigidity 18 .Knowledge management, and its related technologies, after we make this clear distincti<strong>on</strong>, canbe the hint to let emerge self-learning paths, organisati<strong>on</strong>al learning based <strong>on</strong> the subjects’independence and <strong>on</strong> the cooperati<strong>on</strong> in the producti<strong>on</strong> processes, but should not be taken asmagical systems that can stock and release ‘knowledge’.In such a c<strong>on</strong>text, there is the real possibility to increase the know-how, this is to define a domain inwhich experiences are shared, opini<strong>on</strong> and interacti<strong>on</strong> exchanged in real time, if we have availablesimple and integrated tools that allow horiz<strong>on</strong>tal communicati<strong>on</strong> according to an organisati<strong>on</strong>modality based <strong>on</strong> network cooperati<strong>on</strong>, better if c<strong>on</strong>nected with variously located interest areas:e-mail, synchr<strong>on</strong>ic textual communicati<strong>on</strong>, forum, video c<strong>on</strong>ference, calendar scheduling.17 Heinz v<strong>on</strong> Foerster, Sistemi che osservano, Astrolabio, 200018 Thomas Koulopoulos del Delphi C<strong>on</strong>sulting Group says: «Over 130 years ago, Karl Marx revoluti<strong>on</strong>ized political and ec<strong>on</strong>omicthought with the publicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> his manifesto Das Kapital. In it, he called for a world ec<strong>on</strong>omy in witch the workers owned thefactors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong>. Today, his visi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a grand communist society lies in tatters. It is supremely ir<strong>on</strong>ic, then, that at theend <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 20th century, the most competitive basti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capitalism have surrendered ownership <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their most valuable factor<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> –knowledge– to the workers. This was not entirely intenti<strong>on</strong>al. it just so happens that knowledge has becomethe most important factor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> for the informati<strong>on</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy, and knowledge resides primarily in the minds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theworkers. This is a dramatic change in thinking for most ec<strong>on</strong>omic models, and requires a fundamental reappraisal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the waythat organizati<strong>on</strong>s manage this newly empowered resource.» (Thomas Koulopoulos, Knowledge Management Toward creating the”knowing enterprise”, http://www.it-c<strong>on</strong>sultancy.com/extern/delphi/, 1998)
- Page 3:
4PREFACENew ways of</strong
- Page 7 and 8:
8PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSI Gl
- Page 10 and 11:
11PLENARY SESSION PRESENTATIONSI St
- Page 12 and 13:
13Learning and organizational devel
- Page 14 and 15:
15The New Policy Agenda for eWork i
- Page 16:
17eWork has also emerged as a key f
- Page 19 and 20:
20Telework and local entrepreneursh
- Page 21 and 22:
22involves interaction and planning
- Page 24 and 25:
25The Green Paper is also addressin
- Page 26 and 27:
27Information society, Globalisatio
- Page 28 and 29:
29The European Uni
- Page 30 and 31:
31The Commission paperThe Commissio
- Page 32 and 33:
33Summary from EPRI meeting 1Jouni
- Page 34 and 35:
35It was agreed that online access
- Page 36 and 37:
37Professor Turkka
- Page 38 and 39:
39Delegations from 24 Europ
- Page 40 and 41:
41ConclusionsMatti Salmenperä, Dir
- Page 42:
43The role of tech
- Page 45 and 46:
46e-Work in Europe - Indicators for
- Page 47 and 48:
48The results from the ECaTT projec
- Page 49 and 50:
50According to our forecasts using
- Page 51 and 52:
52In general, the transition from t
- Page 53 and 54:
54market adaptablity (in the EC und
- Page 55 and 56:
56Tele-cooperation is already widel
- Page 57 and 58:
58As Table 7 shows, overall self-em
- Page 59 and 60:
60the traditional view of</
- Page 61 and 62:
62Figure 4:Adaptability of<
- Page 63 and 64:
646. Summary and ConclusionsThe pre
- Page 65 and 66:
66Virtual work in a real worldUrsul
- Page 67 and 68:
68Still more misleading is the assu
- Page 69 and 70:
70what, then, has changed?Any analy
- Page 71 and 72:
72Preliminary results of</s
- Page 73 and 74:
74Figure 3:eWork demand in Europe,
- Page 75 and 76:
76As can be seen, by far the most c
- Page 77 and 78:
78Information Security in E-workArt
- Page 79 and 80:
803. The impact of
- Page 81 and 82:
82Accommodating the new economy:The
- Page 83 and 84:
84With distributed workforces only
- Page 85 and 86:
86As the level of
- Page 87 and 88:
885. SANE future research tasksThe
- Page 89 and 90:
90Awareness: For fluent distributed
- Page 91 and 92:
92On a 17” screen the user is abl
- Page 94 and 95:
95PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSI G
- Page 96 and 97:
972. The set of VI
- Page 98 and 99:
99What is global e-Work?E-work is w
- Page 100 and 101: 101Contribution to progress in the
- Page 102 and 103: 103Most relevant: The unprecedented
- Page 104 and 105: 105PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSII
- Page 106 and 107: 107The Siemens CaseSiemens Finland
- Page 108 and 109: 109Challenges of v
- Page 110 and 111: 111Teleware’s combination trainin
- Page 112 and 113: 113PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSII
- Page 114 and 115: 115Towns should regain their anothe
- Page 116 and 117: 117In order to be successful, devel
- Page 118 and 119: 119The Models of I
- Page 120 and 121: 121Table 1.Telework implementation
- Page 122 and 123: 123of threats in o
- Page 124 and 125: 125Fig.3.Level of
- Page 126 and 127: 127Telework is applied in Poland in
- Page 128 and 129: 129The first area is strictly conne
- Page 130 and 131: 131Awareness of Te
- Page 132 and 133: 133work more effective, producing h
- Page 134 and 135: 135Conferences on Telework in Budap
- Page 136 and 137: 137Telecommunication services penet
- Page 138 and 139: 139Look at World (in Estonian: Vaat
- Page 140 and 141: 141Aim of project
- Page 142 and 143: 143PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSIV
- Page 144 and 145: 145There seems to be a vicious circ
- Page 146 and 147: 147netOrganisationStefano Lotti, CE
- Page 148 and 149: 149We can now temporarily observe t
- Page 152 and 153: 153The possibility to access an org
- Page 154 and 155: 1556. Some wishes, to replace concl
- Page 156 and 157: 157PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSV
- Page 158 and 159: 159This paper looks first at how eL
- Page 160 and 161: 161Figure 1:Lead operators and free
- Page 162 and 163: 163Table 1:Online work exchange mar
- Page 164 and 165: 165Table 2:Tele-cooperation in Euro
- Page 166 and 167: 1675 ConclusionsMalone and Laubache
- Page 168 and 169: 169Home Telework As A Key Action To
- Page 170 and 171: 171a structured questionnaire, and
- Page 172 and 173: 1735. Telework Eight Months LaterDu
- Page 174 and 175: 175In both the surveys, the workers
- Page 176 and 177: 177represented an important variabl
- Page 178 and 179: 179The work deprived were the secon
- Page 180 and 181: 181divide and blur lines between wo
- Page 182 and 183: 183PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSVI
- Page 184 and 185: 185Since technological reason in ge
- Page 186 and 187: 187The main exception at the moment
- Page 188 and 189: 189Claussen 2001) , the few bigger
- Page 190 and 191: 191ReferencesAlasoini. T. and Kyll
- Page 192 and 193: 193IntroductionThe ongoing economic
- Page 194 and 195: 195Building on former programmesThe
- Page 196 and 197: 197Therefore, it seems essential th
- Page 198 and 199: NotesBaethge, Martin (1999): Transf
- Page 200 and 201:
201organizations, R&D institutes, a
- Page 202 and 203:
203Challenges for Programmatic Work
- Page 204 and 205:
205different kinds of</stro
- Page 206 and 207:
207PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSVI
- Page 208 and 209:
209Development Cooperation
- Page 210 and 211:
211How to fi nd work tasks?There is
- Page 212 and 213:
213IntroductionEco-Managed eWork as
- Page 214 and 215:
215In a recent survey by the Helsin
- Page 216 and 217:
217The experiment is connected with
- Page 218 and 219:
219their interest in returning to t
- Page 220 and 221:
221businesses, have access to the v
- Page 222 and 223:
223Short summaries of</stro
- Page 224 and 225:
225As a result of
- Page 226 and 227:
227PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSVI
- Page 228 and 229:
229The knowledge economy is not <st
- Page 230 and 231:
231PARALLEL SESSION PRESENTATIONSIX
- Page 232 and 233:
233The paper of Sh
- Page 234 and 235:
In total, the conference once again
- Page 236 and 237:
237Appendix AE -WORK 2001 Conferenc
- Page 238 and 239:
239Year 2002 conferenceParallel ses
- Page 240 and 241:
2417. Community developments15.00 -
- Page 242 and 243:
243Appendix CList of</stron
- Page 244 and 245:
245Harle Bob European</stro
- Page 246 and 247:
247Koivusalo Salla Helsinki Univers
- Page 248 and 249:
249Mustikkamäki Nina University Of
- Page 250 and 251:
251Sajavaara AnuEmployers’ Associ
- Page 252 and 253:
253Wasinger Walter Informations-Tec
- Page 254 and 255:
255