12.07.2015 Views

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Indian <strong>Police</strong> JournalProcedure Code. Rape victim may be under psychological pressure,residence in the presence <strong>of</strong> her relatives. Proviso to Sec. 157(1)provides:“Provided further that in relation to an <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> rape, therecording <strong>of</strong> statement <strong>of</strong> victim shall be conducted at theresidence <strong>of</strong> the victim or in place <strong>of</strong> her choice <strong>and</strong> as for as parents or guardian or near relatives or social worker <strong>of</strong> thelocality.”Section 160 <strong>and</strong> 157 <strong>of</strong> Cr.P.C. make balancing between social interest person in <strong>Police</strong> Station for interrogating him, at the same time imposerestriction on police power for protecting vulnerable class <strong>of</strong> people.which result in gross violations <strong>of</strong> human rights. Courts are seriousabout such problems <strong>and</strong> recommended in many cases prompt <strong>and</strong>N<strong>and</strong>ini Satpathiv. P.L. Dani, appellant N<strong>and</strong>ini Satpathi was ex-Chief Minister <strong>of</strong>Orissa <strong>and</strong> ex-Minister in Central Government. She was accused innumber <strong>of</strong> corruption cases, which were in process <strong>of</strong> investigation.She was called in <strong>Police</strong> Station <strong>by</strong> Dy.SP Vigilance for interrogation. extended list <strong>of</strong> questions to be answered <strong>by</strong> her. She refused to answeron the ground that these questions were incriminatory in nature. Onagainst her before SDJM, Cuttack u/s 179 <strong>of</strong> IPC that she was bound toanswer truly all the questions put to her u/s 161 Cr.P.C. And, in case<strong>of</strong> not giving answer, she is liable to be punished u/s 179 IPC. SDJMissued summon for appearing before the court <strong>and</strong> it was challengedbefore the High Court but High Court did not interfere with the orderquashed proceeding before SDJM. The Supreme Court observed that awoman must not be called in <strong>Police</strong> Station for examination:“Before discussing the core issues, we wish to note our regret, in<strong>of</strong> the wholesome proviso to Sec. 160(1) <strong>of</strong> the Cr.P.C. Such122 January - March, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!