12.07.2015 Views

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Indian <strong>Police</strong> Journalrelationship on the date <strong>of</strong> preferring the application. The Courtheld that the words ‘has been’ <strong>and</strong> ‘have lived’ are also used inthe Act, which means that even though it is not in continuity, thenalso the application can be made on the basis <strong>of</strong> past relationship.• N<strong>and</strong> Kishore v. State <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan 30In this case also, the Court took the opinion that the complaintcan be against any male or female relative <strong>of</strong> the husb<strong>and</strong> as theproviso to Section 2(q) <strong>of</strong> the Act provides only about the relative<strong>and</strong> not the male relative.• Dr. Vinod Parasher v. State <strong>of</strong> U.P. 31The Court held in this case that the proceedings under the Act isessentially <strong>of</strong> civil nature <strong>and</strong> it is only for the purpose <strong>of</strong> cuttingdown procedural delays that the powers have been conferred tothe Magistrate under the provisions <strong>of</strong> Cr.P.C. for the enforcement<strong>of</strong> rights under the Act.• Ramadevi v. State <strong>of</strong> Kerala 32The Court in this case has refused to give narrow meaning to theword ‘aggrieved person’ <strong>and</strong> ‘respondent’. The aggrieved personmeans any woman who is or has been in a domestic relationshipwith the respondent <strong>and</strong> who alleges to have been subjected toaggrieved person can only relate to a domestic violence allegedto have been committed <strong>by</strong> the respondent to the application <strong>and</strong>for the meaning <strong>of</strong> the term respondent, the reference can be madeto Section 2(q) <strong>of</strong> the Act, which provides that it means any adultmale person who is or has been in domestic relationship withthe aggrieved person provided that the aggrieved wife or femalecomplaint against a relative <strong>of</strong> the husb<strong>and</strong> or male partner. Thus,such a relative cannot be only a male partner. If the respondentto an application under Section 12 <strong>of</strong> the Act could only be malepartner <strong>and</strong> a female person could never be the respondent toan application under this Section, then the proviso to Section 19(1) would be meaningless. 33 If the proviso is considered, then itwould indicate only embargo against the passing <strong>of</strong> the residenceorder.302009(3) Cr. Court Cases 259 (Raj).312008(3) Cr. Court Cases 0217 (All).322009(1) Cr. Court Cases 083 (Ker).33See 158 January - March, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!