12.07.2015 Views

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

by Police - Bureau of Police Research and Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Indian <strong>Police</strong> Journalsometimes when omission, means what is not part <strong>of</strong> statement <strong>and</strong>which was not stated <strong>by</strong> witness at the time <strong>of</strong> interrogation, may alsomaking statement sensible or self-consistent, some words not stated,becomes necessary to imply. Omission in statement is implied whenpositive statement is implying those omissions. In such a situation,omission takes the shape <strong>of</strong> positive statement though it was not given“Statement in its dictionary meaning is the act <strong>of</strong> stating orreciting. Pima facie, a statement cannot take in an omission.A statement cannot include that which is not stated. But very<strong>of</strong>ten, to make a statement sensible or self-consistent, it becomesnecessary to imply words which are not actually in the statement.Though something is not expressly stated, it is necessarily impliedfrom what is directly or expressly stated. To illustrate: ‘A’ madea statement previously that he saw ’B’ stabbing ‘C’ to death; butbefore court he deposed that he saw ‘B’ <strong>and</strong> ‘D’ stabbing ‘C’to death; the court can imply the word ‘only’ after ‘B’ in thestatement before the police. Sometimes, a positive statement mayhave a negative aspect <strong>and</strong> a negative one a positive aspect. Takean extreme example: if a witness states that man is dark, it alsomeans that he is not fair. Though the statement made describesrelatively the colour <strong>of</strong> a skin, it is implicit in the statement itselfthat it is not <strong>of</strong> any other colour. Further, there are occasionswhen we come across two statements made <strong>by</strong> the same personat different times <strong>and</strong> both <strong>of</strong> them cannot st<strong>and</strong> or co-exist. Thereis an inherent repugnancy between the two; therefore, if one istrue, the other must be false. On one occasion, a person says thatwhen he entered the room he saw ‘A’ shooting ‘B’ dead with gun;on other occasion, same person says that when he entered roomhe saw ‘C’ stabbing ‘B’ dead: both statement obviously cannot<strong>and</strong> vice versa…but <strong>by</strong> construction, the said omissions must bedeemed to be part <strong>of</strong> the statement in writing. Such omissions arenot really omissions strictly so-called <strong>and</strong> the statement must bedeemed to contain them <strong>by</strong> implication. A statement, therefore,in our view not only includes what is expressly stated therin, butalso what is necessarily implied therefrom.” 11134 January - March, 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!