12.07.2015 Views

First Responder EMS Curriculum for Training Centers in Eurasia

First Responder EMS Curriculum for Training Centers in Eurasia

First Responder EMS Curriculum for Training Centers in Eurasia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CPR. The child must be moved if he or she is <strong>in</strong> a dangerous location (i.e., a burn<strong>in</strong>g build<strong>in</strong>g) orif CPR cannot be per<strong>for</strong>med where the child was found.If a second rescuer is present dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial assessment of the child, that rescuer shouldactivate the <strong>EMS</strong> system as soon as the emergency is recognized. If trauma is suspected, thesecond rescuer should activate the <strong>EMS</strong> system and then may assist <strong>in</strong> immobiliz<strong>in</strong>g the child'scervical sp<strong>in</strong>e, prevent<strong>in</strong>g movement of the neck (extension, flexion, and rotation) and torso. Ifthe child must be positioned <strong>for</strong> resuscitation or moved <strong>for</strong> safety reasons, support the head andbody and turn as a unit.Activate <strong>EMS</strong> System if Second Rescuer Is AvailableBecause all of the l<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong> the Cha<strong>in</strong> of Survival are connected, it is difficult to evaluate the effectof <strong>EMS</strong> system activation or specific <strong>EMS</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> isolation. In addition, local <strong>EMS</strong>response <strong>in</strong>tervals, dispatcher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>EMS</strong> protocols may dictate the most appropriatesequence of <strong>EMS</strong> activation and early life support <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>for</strong> a given situation.Current AHA guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>struct the rescuer to provide approximately 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute of CPR be<strong>for</strong>eactivat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>EMS</strong> system <strong>in</strong> out-of-hospital arrest <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants and children up to the age of 8years. In the International Guidel<strong>in</strong>es 2000 the "phone first" sequence of resuscitation cont<strong>in</strong>uesto be recommended <strong>for</strong> children > 8 years of age and adults. The "phone fast" sequence ofresuscitation cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be recommended <strong>for</strong> children < 8 years of age on the basis of face andconstruct validity (Class Indeterm<strong>in</strong>ate).The AHA Subcommittees on Pediatric Resuscitation and BLS and a panel address<strong>in</strong>g thecitizen's response <strong>in</strong> the Cha<strong>in</strong> of Survival debated a proposal to teach lay rescuers to tailor theCPR sequence and <strong>EMS</strong> activation to the likely cause of the victim's arrest rather than thevictim's age. This proposed approach would teach lone lay rescuers to provide 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute of CPRbe<strong>for</strong>e activat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>EMS</strong> system if a victim of any age collapses with what is thought to be aprobable breath<strong>in</strong>g/respiratory problem. Lone lay rescuers would also be taught to activate the<strong>EMS</strong> system immediately if a victim of any age collapses suddenly (presumed sudden cardiacarrest). Although the proposal has appeal when considered <strong>for</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual victim, it wasrejected <strong>for</strong> several reasons. <strong>First</strong>, no data was presented that <strong>in</strong>dicated that a change to anetiology-based triage method <strong>for</strong> all age groups would improve survival <strong>for</strong> victims of out-ofhospitalcardiac arrest. Second, the proposal would probably complicate the education of layrescuers. CPR <strong>in</strong>struction must rema<strong>in</strong> simple <strong>for</strong> lay rescuers. Retention of CPR skills andknowledge is already suboptimal. The addition of complex <strong>in</strong>structions to exist<strong>in</strong>g CPRguidel<strong>in</strong>es would most likely make them more difficult to teach, learn, remember, and per<strong>for</strong>m.It is important to note that the "phone first" or "phone fast" sequence is applicable only to thelone rescuer. When multiple rescuers are present, 1 rescuer rema<strong>in</strong>s with the victim of any age tobeg<strong>in</strong> CPR while another rescuer goes to activate the <strong>EMS</strong> system. It is unknown how frequently2 or more lay responders are present dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial evaluation of a pediatric cardiopulmonaryemergency.Sophisticated healthcare providers, family members, and potential rescuers of <strong>in</strong>fants andchildren at high risk <strong>for</strong> cardiopulmonary emergencies should be taught a sequence of rescueactions tailored to the potential victim's specific high-risk condition. For example, parents andchild care providers of children with congenital heart disease who are known to be at risk <strong>for</strong><strong>First</strong> <strong>Responder</strong> <strong>EMS</strong> <strong>Curriculum</strong>/AIHA, July 2002 349

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!