1st Aug 08 - 31st Jan 09

318(lxxii The target number of teachers district-wise to be given refresher training of 60days and the actual number of teachers given such training. What was the modeof training (institutional or distance); venue of training? Module and content oftraining and who prepared it? Who were the trainers? What supervision/monitoringwas done for the training? How many untrained teachers are still left to be coveredin State (district visited? What is SPO’s planning for it?Untrained - primary -37 UP-23 (SPO)(lxxiii The satisfaction level of training? Whether there are any areas, which the teacherwould like to get trained?Out of 104 schools – 4 schools reported ‘not good’(lxxivThe academic support given by BRC/CRC to the teachers, the frequency of suchsupport:cc. Please specify the role of BRC/CRC’s in teacher training (inservice/induction training for new recruits/training of untrainedteachers)? What tasks are they responsible for? To what extent havethey discharged that role? Is there a calendar for trainings and follow upprogrammes, available at BRC/CRC level and to what extent is thisbeing followed? What are the specific topics on which BRC/CRC levelfollow up has been done in what mode(workshop/meetings/school visit –with teachers) and degree of effectiveness (as perceived by teachersand BRCC/CRCC)?To be ascertained from theSPO and updated from theDPO in respect of the districtsvisited by the MI and to beverified from the teachers inschools visited by MI.To be ascertained from theteachers on the spot in respectof schools visited by MI.To be ascertained fromBRC/CRC (atleast 5 each) andthe teachers on the spot inrespect of schools/EGS centresvisited by MI.3 BRC (KHIRKIYA, TIMARI, JAMPAL KENDRN) reported the role- arrangement of tent,lunch, drinking water, basic needs. Calendar of training exist. Follow up is done throughwork shop. Degree of effectiveness- 70%-75%103 school visit data about the role - all response was this type- arrangement, tent forrest, eating food &drinking waterThough it is not possible to say with precision the degree of effectiveness of trainingteachers have said it in percentage terms. One can estimate that they are benefitting fromtraining as 83 out of 103 schools have reported that training is effective to the extent ofmore than 60 %. Its authenticity can be verified by the fact that many have also reportedless and one has reported 0.dd. What is the expected number of school visits to be made by BRC/CRC in State and in the districts visited?Is it being followed?TIMARI- 20 school in a month, KHIRKIYA and JAMPAL KENDRN- 40 school in a month.This is being followed up.It is a serious matter that 37 out of 103 schools believe that the CRC is supposed to visitonly 1 school per week.ee. What are the BRCC’s and CRCC’s doing during these visits? Check their reports? How much of it relates topedagogic improvement issues and how much on “administrative” matters? Are they conducting modellessons in classrooms themselves, are they helping teachers to teach certain difficult topics better? Do theyconduct random tests for children’s learning? Any other aspect or innovative steps taken by BRCC’s/CRCC’s to improve teacher performance and children’s learning?Innovative step- Issue a special guide (KHIRKIYA).ff.Is the DIET interacting, with BRC/CRCs and what is their role in capacity building; academic supervisionand guidance; action research and monitoring of BRC/CRCs?gg. Are the BRC/CRCs extending their academic support to EGS/AIE centres/courses in their area? If so howand in what manner? If not, why?98 schools reported yes.318