War and Peace in Qajar Persia: Implications Past and ... - Oguzlar.az

Narrowing the frontier 17346 For a detailed primary record of these events from British official documents,see Schofield, op. cit. (1989), vol. 3: Further Delimitation Efforts and Disputesover Pusht-i Kuh and Khotour, 1874–1897.47 Schofield, “Introduction”, in op. cit. (1989), vol. 3, p. xv.48 Ibid., p. xvi.49 Ibid.50 “Memorandum by Mr Parker on the Turco-Persian Boundary Question (1833 to1906)”, Foreign Office, 8 December 1906 in Schofield, op. cit. (1989), vol. 4: OttomanEncroachments across Northern Border and Recurrence of Muhammara Dispute,1903–1911, p. 100.51 See Arnold Kemball’s “Memorandum on the Present State of the Turco-PersianBoundary Question and the Conditions on which its Solution would seem toDepend”, 2 April 1875 and E. Hertslet’s “Memorandum Respecting Turco-PersianBoundary Delimitation”, March 1875 in Schofield, op. cit. (1989), vol. 3, pp. 63–162.52 “Memorandum by Mr Parker . . .” in Schofield, op. cit. (1989), vol. 4, p. 100.53 Ibid., p. 101.54 Ibid.55 Schofield, op. cit. (2006), pp. 27–39.56 Hubbard, op. cit.57 Schofield, op. cit. (1989), vol. 1, p. 84.58 Foreign Office, October 1912, Memorandum on the Russian publication (editedby M. A. Gamazof), “Travelling Diary of Y. I. Tchirikof, Russian MediatingCommissioner on the Turco-Persian Delimitation, 1849–1852”, FO 881/10116.Reproduced in ibid. (1989), vol. 2, pp. 293–469.59 Kashani-Sabet, op. cit. (1999); also, Kashani-Sabet, “Picturing the Homeland:Geography and National Identity in Late Nineteenth Century and Early TwentiethCentury Iran”, Journal of Historical Geography 24/4 (October 1998): 413–30.60 Please see the companion chapter by Lawrence G. Potter elsewhere in thisvolume.61 Richard Schofield, “Anything but Black and White – a Commentary on the LowerGulf Islands Dispute”, in Lawrence G. Potter and Gary G. Sick, eds, Securityin the Persian Gulf: Origins, Obstacles and the Search for Consensus (New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 171–87.There has been an attempt to maintain consistency of transliterations throughout thisvolume. This chapter is no exception but includes transliterations for place-namesused by the British government during the period under review. The main reason forso doing is that many of the smaller settlements or sub-regions mentioned in the textdo not easily correspond to modern settlement patterns today. One cannot be sureabout the modern names, existence or location of all these localities.