KAYNAKLAR • Agliardi, F., and Crosta, G. B., 2002. 3-D numerical modelling of rockfalls in the Lecco urban area (Lombardia Region, Italy), in: Proc. EUROCK 2002, I.S.R.M. International Symposium on Rock Engineering for Mountainous Regions, Madeira, edited by Dinis de Gama, C. and Ribeiro e Sous, L., Sociedade Portuguesa de Geotecnica, 79–86. • Agliardi, F., and Crosta, G.B., 2003. High resolution three-dimensional numerical modeling of rockfalls: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mineral Science, v. 40, p. 455-471. • Agliardi, F., Cardinali, M., Crosta, G. B., Guzzetti, F., Detti, R., and Reichenbach, P., 2001. A computer program to evaluate rockfall hazard and risk at the regional scale, Examples from the Lombardy Region, Geophysical Research abstract, 3, 8617. • Akgun, A., Sezer, E.A., Nefeslioglu, H.A., Gokceoglu, C., Pradhan, B., 2012. An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm, Computers & Geosciences, 38, 23-34. • Aksoy, B. and Ercanoğlu, M., 2012. Landslide identification and classification by object- based image analysis and fuzzy logic: An example from the Azdavay region (Kastamonu, Turkey). Computers & Geosiciences, 38, 87-98. • Alca´ntara-Ayala, I., 2002. Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology, 47, 107-124. • Aleotti, P. And Chowdhurry, R., 1999, Landslide hazard assessments: Summry rewiew and new perspective, Bulletin of Engineering Geology of the Environment, 58, 21-44. • Alkevli, T. and Ercanoğlu, M., 2011. Assessment of ASTER satellite images in landslide inventory mapping: Yenice-Gökçebey (Western Black Sea Region, Turkey). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 70, 607-617. • Althuwaynee, O.F., Pradhan, B., Park, H.-J., Lee, H.J., 2014. A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping, Catena, 114, 21-36. • Althuwaynee, O.F., Pradhan, B., Lee, S., 2012. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping, Computers & Geosciences, 44,120-135. • Atkinson, P.M., Massari, R., 2011. Autologistic modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the Central Apennines, Italy, Geomorphology, 130, 55-64. • Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan, Geomorphology, 65, 15–31. • Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., Marui, H., Kanno, T., 2005. Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications , Engineering Geology, 81, 432– 445. • Ayenew, T., Barbieri, G., 2005. Inventory of landslides and susceptibility mapping in the Dessie area, northern Ethiopia,Engineering Geology, 77, 1 –15. • Baeza, C. and Corominas, J., 2001, Assessment of shallow landslides susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques, Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 26, 251-1263. • Bai, S., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Cheng, C., 2012. Combined landslide susceptibility mapping after Wenchuan earthquake at the Zhouqu segment in the Bailongjiang Basin, China, Catena, 99, 18-25. • Bai, S.-B., Wang, J., L¨u, G.-N., Zhou, P.-G., Hou, S.-S., Xu, S.-N., 2009. GIS-Based and Data-Driven Bivariate Landslide-Susceptibility Mapping in the Three Gorges Area, China, Pedosphere, 19(1): 14-20. • Bai, S.-B., Wang, J., Lü, G.-N., Zhou, P.-G., Hou, S.-S., Xu, S.-N., 2010. GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China, Geomorphology, 115, 23-31. • Bălteanu, D., Chendeş, V., Sima, M., Enciu, P., 2010. A country-wide spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility in Romania, Geomorphology, 124, 102-112. • Bednarik, M., Magulová, B., Matys, M., Marschalko, M., 2010. Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kralˇovany– Liptovsky´ Mikuláš railway case study, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 35, 162-171. • Blahut, J., Van Westen C.J., Sterlacchini, S., 2010. Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris-flow source areas, Geomorphology, 119, 36-51. 140 Bütünleşik Tehlike Haritalarının Hazırlanması HEYELAN-KAYA DÜŞMESİ TEMEL KILAVUZ
• Booth, A.M., Roering, J.J., Perron, J.T., 2009. Automated landslide mapping using spectral analysis and high-resolution topographic data: Puget Sound lowlands, Washington, and Portland Hills, Oregon. Geomorphology, Volume 109, Issues 3–4, 132-147. • Brabb, E., 1991. The world landslide problem. Episodes, 14(i): 52-61. • Brabb, E.E., Harrod, B.L., 1989. Landslides: Extent and Economic Significance. A.A. Balkema Publisher, Rotterdam, 385 pp. • Bradshaw, M. J., Abbot, A. J., Gelsthorpe, A. P., 1979. The Earth’s Changing Surface. British Library Cataloguing Edition, Edinburgh, 336 pp. • Bui, D.T., Pradhan, B., Lofman, O., Revhaug, I., Dick, O.B., 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS, Computers & Geosciences, 45, 199-211. • Can, T., Nefeslioglu, H.A., Gokceoglu, C., Sonmez, H., Duman, T.Y., 2005. Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses,Geomorphology, 72, 250– 271. • Capons, R., Vilaplana, J. M., Linares, R., 2009. Rockfall travel distance analysis by using empirical models (Sola d’Andorra la Vella, Central Pyrenees. Natural Hazards Earth System Science, 9, 2107-2118. • Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., 1992. Uncertainty in assessing landslide hazard risk, ITC Journal, 2, pp. 172-183. • Cascini, L., 2008. Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales. Engineering Geology, 102, 3-4, 161-177. • Castellanos Abella, E.A., Van Westen, C.J., 2008. Qualitative landslide susceptibility assessment bymulticriteria analysis: A case study from San Antonio del Sur, Guantánamo, Cuba, Geomorphology, 94, 453-466. • Chauhan, S., Sharmab, M., Aroraa, M.K., Guptac, N.K., 2010. Landslide Susceptibility Zonation through ratings derived from Artificial Neural Network, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 12, 340-350. • Che, V.B., Kervyn, M., Suh, C.E., Fontijn, K., Ernst, G.G.J., Marmol, M.-A., Trefois, P., Jacobs, P., 2012. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Limbe (SW Cameroon): A field calibrated seed cell and information value method, Catena, 92, 83-98. • Choi, J., Oh, H.-J., Lee, H.-J., Lee, C., Lee, S., 2012. Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS, Engineering Geology, 124,12-23. • Close, U. and McCormick, E., 1922. Where the mountains walked: National Geographic Magazine, v.41, no.5, p. 445-464. • Coelho-Netto, A.L., Avelar, A.S., Fernandes, M.C., Lacerda, W.A., 2007. Landslide susceptibility in a mountainous geoecosystem, Tijuca Massif, Rio de Janeiro: The role of morphometric subdivision of the terrain,Geomorphology, 87, 120-131. • Conforti, M., Pascale, S., Robustelli, G., Sdao, F., 2014. Evaluation of prediction capability of the artificial neural networks formapping landslide susceptibility in the Turbolo River catchment (northern Calabria, Italy), Catena, 113, 236-250. • Conoscenti, C., Maggio, C.D., Rotigliano, E., 2008. GIS analysis to assess landslide susceptibility in a fluvial basin of NW Sicily (Italy), Geomorphology 94, 325-339. • Cornforth, D.H., 2004. Landslides in practice, John wiley & sons, 1-596. • Corominas, J., Moya, J., 2008. A review of assessing landslide frequency for hazard zoning purposes. Engineering Geology 102, 193-213. • Crosta, G.B. and Agliardi F., 2004. Parametric evaluation of 3D dispersion of rockfall trajectories: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 4: 583–598. • Crosta, G.B., and Agliardi, F., 2003. A methodology for physically based rockfall hazard assessment: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, v. 3, p. 407-422. • Crovelli, R.A., 2000. Probability Models for Estimation of Number and Costs of Landslides: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 00-249, 23 p., available at http://greenwood.cr.usgs.gov/ pub/open-file-reports/ofr-00-0249/. • Cruden, D. M. and Varnes, D. J., 1996. Landslide types and processes, in: Landslides. Investigation and Mitigation, edited by: Tuner, A. K. and Schuster, R. L., Special report of the Transportation Research Brand. Natural Research Council, Na- Bütünleşik Tehlike Haritalarının Hazırlanması HEYELAN-KAYA DÜŞMESİ TEMEL KILAVUZ 141
- Page 1 and 2:
AFAD Ankara, 2015
- Page 3 and 4:
önemlidir. Bu tür haritalardan fa
- Page 5 and 6:
5. HEYELAN DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNDE
- Page 7 and 8:
Şekil 3.5. Kuzulu-Koyulhisar (Bak
- Page 9 and 10:
Şekil 8.19. Kaya düşmeleri önle
- Page 11:
Çizelge 5.1. Heyelan değerlendirm
- Page 14 and 15:
1 GİRİŞ Özellikle 1950-1960’l
- Page 16 and 17:
1 GİRİŞ 50 Yıllık Periyotta 28
- Page 19 and 20:
2 HEYELANLAR ve GENEL ÖZELLİKLER
- Page 21 and 22:
2.2. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Meyd
- Page 23 and 24:
Şekil 2.3. Türkiye’de son 50 y
- Page 25 and 26:
Ülkemizde, özellikle Karadeniz b
- Page 27 and 28:
2.3.1. Kütlesel Özellikler Heyela
- Page 29 and 30:
2.3.3. Heyelanların Aktivite Özel
- Page 31 and 32:
2.3.5. Heyelanların Aktivite Türl
- Page 33 and 34:
2.4. Heyelanların Sınıflandırı
- Page 35 and 36:
HEYELANLAR Can ve Mal Kayıpların
- Page 37 and 38:
Şekil 2.14. Heyelan sınıflamalar
- Page 39:
Şekil 2.17. Ulus (Bartın) bölges
- Page 42 and 43:
3 HEYELAN ENVANTERİ Heyelanlar, je
- Page 44 and 45:
3 HEYELAN ENVANTERİ 3.2. Heyelan E
- Page 46 and 47:
3 HEYELAN ENVANTERİ Şekil 3.4. Yu
- Page 48 and 49:
3 HEYELAN ENVANTERİ 3.3.3. Jeoloji
- Page 50 and 51:
3 HEYELAN ENVANTERİ Örneğin, Lan
- Page 52 and 53:
3 HEYELAN ENVANTERİ 3.6. Diğer Y
- Page 54 and 55:
3 HEYELAN ENVANTERİ Şekil 3.11. K
- Page 57 and 58:
4 HEYELAN ANALİZ AŞAMALARI
- Page 59 and 60:
4.1. Kullanılan Ölçekler ve Etki
- Page 61 and 62:
4.2. Jeolojik Çalışmalar Uzun s
- Page 63 and 64:
Şekil 4.4. Yenice (Karabük) bölg
- Page 65 and 66:
Trabzon Çal-Çiğdemli Köyü Heye
- Page 67 and 68:
Çizelge 4.4. Heyelan değerlendiri
- Page 69 and 70:
Şekil 4.5. Heyelan envanteri-veri
- Page 71:
Şekil 4.7. Vektör ve raster veril
- Page 74 and 75:
5 HEYELAN DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNDE K
- Page 76 and 77:
5 HEYELAN DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNDE K
- Page 78 and 79:
5 HEYELAN DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNDE K
- Page 80 and 81:
5 HEYELAN DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNDE K
- Page 82 and 83:
5 HEYELAN DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNDE K
- Page 84 and 85:
5 HEYELAN DEĞERLENDİRMELERİNDE K
- Page 87 and 88:
6 HEYELAN DUYARLILIĞI VE DEĞERLEN
- Page 89 and 90: 6.1. Jeomorfolojik Analizler Jeomor
- Page 91 and 92: 6.2.2.2. Diskriminant Analizi Diskr
- Page 93 and 94: Şekil 6.1. Uygulamanın gerçekle
- Page 95 and 96: 6.5.3. Frekans Oranı Değerlerinin
- Page 97: ilgileriyle hesaplanabilecek ve ala
- Page 100 and 101: 7 HEYELAN TEHLİKE VE RİSK DEĞERL
- Page 102 and 103: 7 HEYELAN TEHLİKE VE RİSK DEĞERL
- Page 104 and 105: 7 HEYELAN TEHLİKE VE RİSK DEĞERL
- Page 106 and 107: 7 HEYELAN TEHLİKE VE RİSK DEĞERL
- Page 109 and 110: 8 KAYA DÜŞMESİ ANALİZLERİ
- Page 111 and 112: Buna karşın, kaya düşmesi olay
- Page 113 and 114: Potansiyel aktif kaynak alanların
- Page 115 and 116: Yukarıdaki yaklaşımla, sayısal
- Page 117 and 118: Şekil 8.9. 25x25 metre çözünür
- Page 119 and 120: Kaya düşmesi olayının gelişti
- Page 121 and 122: Çizelge 8.3. teki çok sayıdaki a
- Page 123 and 124: Çizelge 8.5. Gölge Açısı sın
- Page 125 and 126: Şekil 8.15. Konik yayılım uygula
- Page 127 and 128: Şekil 8.16. S. Martino dağlık b
- Page 129 and 130: Ormanlık ve çıplak yamaçlarda d
- Page 131 and 132: 8.7. Örnek Uygulama Bu bölümde,
- Page 133 and 134: Şekil 8.22. ISRM (1981)’e göre
- Page 135 and 136: Şekil 8.24.Farklı konik yayılım
- Page 137 and 138: G Kayma yüzeyi, yerdeğiştiren ma
- Page 139: T U V Kayan kütle içinde meydana
- Page 143 and 144: • Ermini, L., Catani, F., Casagli
- Page 145 and 146: • Jaiswal, P., Van Westen, C.J.,
- Page 147 and 148: • Ozdemir, A., Altural, T., 2013.
- Page 149 and 150: • Van Den Eeckhaut, M., Marre, A.
- Page 151: KATKIDA BULUNANLAR Yürütücü Eki