AFAD Ankara 2015

KAYNAKLAR
tional Academy Press, Washington DC, 36–75.
• Cruden, D.M., Varnes, D.J., 1996. Landslide Types and Processes. Landslides Investigation and Mitigation, Special Report
247. In: Turner, A.K. and Schuster, R.L. (eds.), 36–75 pp.
• Çan, T., Duman, T. Y., Olgun, Ş., Çörekçioğlu, Ş., Gülmez, F. K., Elmacı, H., Hamzaçebi, S., Emre, Ö., 2013. Türkiye heyelan
veri tabanı. TMMOB CBS Kongresi, Ankara.
• Damm, B., Becht, M., Varga, K., Heckmann, T., 2010. Relevance of tectonic and structural parameters in Triassic bedrock
formations to landslide susceptibility in Quaternary hillslope sediments, Quaternary International, 222, 143-153.
• Das, I., Stein, A., Kerle, N., Dadhwal, V.K., 2012. Landslide susceptibility mapping along road corridors in the Indian Himalayas
using Bayesian logistic regression models, Geomorphology, 179, 116-125.
• Deb, S.K., El-Kadi, A.I., 2009. Susceptibility assessment of shallow landslides on Oahu, Hawaii, under extreme-rainfall
events, Geomorphology, 108, 219-233.
• Demoulin, A., Chang-Jo F. Chung, C.-J.F., 2007. Mapping landslide susceptibility from small datasets: A case study in the
Pays de Herve (E Belgium), Geomorphology 89 (2007) 391–404.
• Derron M.H., 2010. Method for the Susceptibility Mapping of Rock Falls in Norway, Technical Report, Geological Survey
of Norway (NGU), Trondheim, Norway.
• Dewitte, O., Chung, C.-J., Cornet, Y., Daoudi, M., Demoulin, A., 2010. Combining spatial data in landslide reactivation susceptibility
mapping: A likelihood ratio-based approach in W Belgium, Geomorphology, 122, 153-166.
• Domaas, U., 1994. Geometrical methods of calculating rockfall range, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Report 585910-
1, 21 pp.
• Domínguez-Cuesta, M.J., Jiménez-Sánchez, M., Berrezueta, E., 2007. Landslides in the Central Coalfield (Cantabrian
Mountains, NW Spain): Geomorphological features, conditioning factors and methodological implications in susceptibility
assessment, Geomorphology, 89, 358-369.
• Dorren L.K.A., Seıjmonsbergen A.C., 2003. Comparison of three GIS-based models for predicting rockfall runout zones at
a regional scale, Geomorphology 56(1-2), p. 49-64.
• Dorren, L.K.A., Berger, F., and Putters, U.S., 2006. Real size experiments and 3D simulation of rockfall on forested and
non-forested slopes: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, v.6, p. 145-153.
• Dymond, J.R., Ausseil, A.G., Shepherd, J.D., Buettner, L., 2006. Validation of a region-wide model of landslide susceptibility
in the Manawatu–Wanganui region of New Zealand, Geomorphology, 74, 70-79.
• Eeckhaut, M.V., Vanwalleghem, T., Poesen, J., Govers, G., Verstraeten, G., Vandekerckhove, L., 2006. Prediction of landslide
susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium), Geomorphology,
76, 392-410.
• Emergency Events Data Base (EM-DAT), 2014. (http://www.emdat.be) (Erişim Tarihi: 27.01.2014).
• Erener, A., Düzgün, H. B. Ş., 2013. A regional scale quantitative risk assessment for landslides: case of Kumluca watershed
in Bartın, Turkey. Landslides, 10, 55-73.
• EPOCH (European Community Programme), 1993. Temporal occurrence and forecasting of landslides in the European
community. (Ed. J.C. Flageollet), Vol.3., Contract No. 90 0025.
• Ercanoglu, M., Gokceoglu, C.,2004. Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone
area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey), Engineering Geology, 75, 229–250.
• Ercanoğlu, M., 2003. Production of landslide susceptibility maps using fuzzy log and statistical methods: West Black Sea
region (South of Kumlace – North of Yenice), Geological Engineering Dept. Hacettepe University, Ph.D. thesis, pp. 203.
• Ercanoğlu, M., 2005. Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartın (West Black Sea Region, Turkey) by artificial
neural networks. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 5, 979-992.
• Ercanoğlu, M., Kaşmer, Ö. and Temiz, N., 2008. Adaptation and comparison of expert opinion to analytical hierarchy process
for landslide susceptibility mapping. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol: 67, No:4, 565-578.
142
Bütünleşik Tehlike Haritalarının Hazırlanması
HEYELAN-KAYA DÜŞMESİ
TEMEL KILAVUZ