05.12.2015 Views

World’s Soil Resources

FAO-world_soils-report-COMPLETE

FAO-world_soils-report-COMPLETE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4.5 Maps of change in soil carbon due to<br />

land use change and land management from<br />

1860 to 2010 from three vegetation models.<br />

Pink indicates loss of soil carbon, blue indicates<br />

carbon gain. The models were run with historical<br />

land use change. This was compared to a<br />

model run with only natural vegetation cover<br />

to diagnose the difference in soil carbon due to<br />

land cover change. Both model runs included<br />

historical climate and CO 2<br />

change. Source: Smith<br />

et al. (in press).<br />

Panel (a) of Figure 4.5 shows cropland and pasture coverage in 2003. The model was run with historical land<br />

use change. This was compared to a model run with only natural vegetation cover to diagnose the difference<br />

in soil carbon due to land cover change up to year 2003 as shown in Panel (b). Both model runs included<br />

historical climate and CO 2<br />

change. Pink indicates loss of carbon due to land use, blue indicates areas of carbon<br />

gain.<br />

Model Tropical Temperate Boreal Global<br />

LPJ-GUESS 12.63 15.01 0.37 29.85<br />

LPJmL 34.86 25.99 0.05 61.86<br />

ISAM 17.24 37.83 5.28 60.35<br />

Mean 21.57666667 26.27666667 1.9 50.68666667<br />

Table 4.1 <strong>Soil</strong> carbon lost globally due to land use change over the period 1860 to 2010 (PgC)<br />

Data are from three vegetation models ISAM (Jain et al., 2013; El-Masri et al., 2013; Barman, Jain and Liang,<br />

2014 a, b); LPJ-GUESS (Smith et al., 2001; Pugh et al., 2015); and LPJmL (Bondeau et al., 2007; Schaphoff et al.,<br />

2013). Each model is run with and without historical land use change data and the difference between the ‘with<br />

land use change’ and ‘no land use change’ runs gives the loss due to land use change. The runs also included<br />

historical climate and CO 2<br />

and cover the period from 1900 to 2010.<br />

Impacts of land management and degradation<br />

Logging and fire are the major causes of forest degradation in the tropics (Bryan et al., 2013). Logging removes<br />

nutrients. Logging operations also cause soil disturbance affecting soil physical properties and nutrient levels<br />

(soil and litter) in tropical (e.g. Olander et al., 2005; Villela et al., 2006; Alexander, 2012) and temperate forests<br />

(Perez et al., 2009). Many physical, chemical, mineralogical, and biological soil properties can be affected by<br />

forest fires depending on fire regime (Certini, 2005). Increased frequency of fires contributes to degradation<br />

and reduces the resilience of the biomes to natural disturbances<br />

Status of the <strong>World’s</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> | Main Report <strong>Soil</strong>s and Humans<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!