05.12.2015 Views

World’s Soil Resources

FAO-world_soils-report-COMPLETE

FAO-world_soils-report-COMPLETE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.2.4 | Spatial distribution of carbon in biomass<br />

A global map of C stored in biomass following the IPCC Tier 1 approach was produced by the European<br />

Commission Joint Research Centre (Carré at al., 2010; EU, 2004; Hiederer et al., 2010). The C stocks are<br />

determined for above- and below-ground biomass and include dead organic matter for the relevant vegetation<br />

types. The default factors largely follow the IPCC specification, with specific attention given to agricultural<br />

areas. The underlying vegetation data are based on the GlobCover V 2.2 (ESA, 2011). Because the GlobCover data<br />

limits cropland to areas below 57º N in Europe the data were merged with the M 3-Cropland (Ramankutty et<br />

al., 2008) and Crops (Monfreda, Ramankutty and Foley, 2008). In a comparison of the geographic distribution<br />

of IPCC vegetation classes between the GlobCover and the M 3 Cropland and Pasture data, some notable<br />

differences were identified (Hiederer et al., 2010). Some of the differences were attributed to the dissimilar<br />

definition of the vegetation classes in the data sets, although others, such as the separation of shrub land<br />

from open forest or confusion between cropland and pastures, seem to be the result of the classification<br />

algorithm used or of sensor characteristics.<br />

The global biomass map thus generated by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) estimates the storage of C in<br />

the above-ground and below-ground vegetation and dead organic matter to be 456 Pg C. The JRC estimates<br />

are thus 44 Pg C (8.8 percent) lower than those of the ‘New IPCC Tier -1 Global Biomass Carbon Map for the<br />

Year 2000’ (Ruesch and Gibbs, 2008). The difference is not evenly distributed between geographic regions. A<br />

comparison of carbon in C by climatic region is given in Figure 6.5.<br />

Figure 6.5 Distribution of carbon in biomass between ORNL-CDIAC Biomass and JRC Carbon Biomass Map<br />

The graph shows that the ORNL-CDIAC Biomass and the JRC Carbon Biomass map are mostly comparable,<br />

but the JRC map places relatively more C in the biomass in ‘Cool Temperate Moist’ (11.4 percent of the total C<br />

stock in biomass; 51.8 Pg C) and ‘Warm Temperate Moist’ (8.7 percent of the total C stock in biomass; 39.9 Pg<br />

C) climate regions at the expense of other regions. By contrast, the ORNL-CDIAC Biomass map locates only 5.7<br />

percent of the total C stock in biomass (28.4 Pg C) in the ‘Cool Temperate Moist’ and 5.7 percent of the total C<br />

stock in biomass (28.7 Pg C) in the ‘Warm Temperate Moist’ climate region.<br />

For the total terrestrial pool of organic C, biomass is the more important pool only in the climate regions<br />

‘Tropical Wet’ and ‘Tropical Moist’. For all other climatic regions, the soil stores more organic C than the biomass<br />

(Scharleman et al., 2014).<br />

Status of the <strong>World’s</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> | Main Report Global soil status, processes and trends<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!