10.12.2012 Views

Protein Protocols Protein Protocols

Protein Protocols Protein Protocols

Protein Protocols Protein Protocols

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

448 Kaufmann<br />

Fig. 3. Conditions for dissociating radiolabeled antibodies after immobilization of polypeptides<br />

on various solid supports. Replicate samples containing 2 × 10 6 rat liver nuclei were<br />

subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by transfer to nitrocellulose, PVDF, or Nytran nylon sheets<br />

as indicated (see Note 2). After staining with fast green FCF and treatment with TSM buffer to<br />

coat unoccupied protein binding sites (Subheading 3.1., steps 8–11), blots were incubated<br />

with chicken polyclonal antiserum that reacts with the nuclear envelope polypeptide lamin B 1<br />

(25) followed by 125 I-labeled rabbit anti-chicken IgG (Subheading 3.4., step 1). Half of each<br />

blot (lanes 6–10) was recoated with milk-containing buffer for 5 min prior to drying<br />

(Subheading 3.4., step 2) and the other half (lanes 1–5) was dried without being recoated with<br />

protein. After autoradiography confirmed that the signals in all lanes of a given panel were<br />

comparable (upper panels), samples were incubated for 30 min at the indicated temperature<br />

with 50–62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) containing 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and one of the<br />

following denaturing agents: 2% (w/v) SDS, 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) or 8 M<br />

urea. Following this erasure procedure, strips were subjected to autoradiography again (bottom<br />

panels). In each case, untreated strips (lanes 1 and 6) served as controls. This analysis leads to<br />

several conclusions. First, recoating with milk prior to drying (Subheading 3.4., step 2) does<br />

not affect the amount of radiolabeled antibody initially bound to the blots (cf. lanes 1 and 6).<br />

Second, the efficacy of various treatments at removing these antibodies varies depending upon<br />

the solid support. For nitrocellulose or PVDF, coating of the blots with protein prior to drying<br />

facilitates the subsequent dissociation of the anti-lamin B antibodies. In both cases, SDS-containing<br />

buffer (lanes 7 and 8) is more effective than guanidine hydrochloride (lane 9) or urea<br />

(lane 10). For nylon, SDS is again slightly more effective than urea at dissociating the antibodies<br />

(cf. lanes 2, 5, and 7, 10). Interestingly, when SDS-containing erasure buffer is used, it is<br />

not necessary to recoat nylon with protein prior to drying for autoradiography (cf. lanes 2 and 7).<br />

This is in contrast to nitrocellulose or PVDF, which were examined in the same experiment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!