10.12.2012 Views

Protein Protocols Protein Protocols

Protein Protocols Protein Protocols

Protein Protocols Protein Protocols

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Western Cross-Blotting 1033<br />

tor sheet against the anodal surface of the dialysis membrane will result in an extreme<br />

decrease of the spot sharpness. The donor blot is removed in this step so that it does not<br />

compete with the antigens on the receptor blot during the subsequent reequilibration step.<br />

Given a sufficient sensitivity according to our experience with previous experiments, the<br />

removal of the donor blot may be omitted.<br />

12. Alternate staining procedures are also possible, for example, second antibody conjugated<br />

to alkaline phosphatase and staining with nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) and bromochloroindolyl<br />

phosphate (BCIP).<br />

As the staining intensity on the receptor blot is significantly lower than that on the reference<br />

strips, one may wish to employ a more sensitive detection system such as luminogenic<br />

enzyme substrates. However, some of these systems require the use of special membranes.<br />

As of now we have no experience to indicate that these membranes are also compatible<br />

with the cross blot procedure.<br />

13. Interpretation of results: Only positive signals should be taken as a result. The failure of a<br />

band on the donor blot to react with a band on the receptor blot does not necessarily prove<br />

the absence of cross-reactivity. Such negative results could also be due to inefficient elution<br />

of an antibody from the donor blot or to denaturation of the eluted antibody. Likewise,<br />

the concentration of the antigen and/or antibody on the donor blot may be too low to<br />

give a signal on the receptor blot. As a rule, do not necessarily expect a signal on the crossblot<br />

from donor blot bands which give only faint signals on the donor blot reference strips.<br />

Generally, it is sometimes difficult to judge the specificity of an antigen–antibody<br />

reaction. This is more likely for antibodies, which have been exposed to low pH values or<br />

chaotropic agents. With cross-blot results, be doubtful about donor blot bands, which give<br />

a signal with each band on the receptor blot. Also, receptor blot bands that react with each<br />

donor blot band should generally not be taken too seriously, unless special circumstances<br />

let you expect such a behavior.<br />

When working with different antigen mixtures on donor and receptor blots, respectively,<br />

include a homologous cross-blot as a control and reference. This is done by crossblotting<br />

antibodies from a donor blot to a receptor blot containing the same antigens as the<br />

donor blot. Such homologous cross-blots have a “natural” internal reference because each<br />

antigen band on the donor blot is crossing “itself” on the receptor blot. In this way, the<br />

cross-blot yields a diagonal line of spots that are helpful in estimating both the sensitivity<br />

and the specificity you can expect with a particular band on the donor blot. Similarly, a<br />

homologous cross-blot may also be carried out with the receptor antigens. This will help<br />

to estimate the resistance of the receptor antigens against exposure to the cross-blot conditions.<br />

References<br />

1. Hammerl, P., Hartl, A., and Thalhamer, J. (1992) A method for the detection of serologically<br />

crossreacting antigens both within and between protein mixtures: the Western cross<br />

blot. J. Immunol. Meth. 151, 299–306.<br />

2. Beall, J. A. and Mitchell, J. F. (1986) Identification of a particular antigen from a parasite<br />

cDNA library using antibodies affinity purified from selected portions of Western blots.<br />

J. Immunol. Meth. 86, 217–223.<br />

3. Laemmli, E. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of<br />

bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!