01.10.2020 Views

ultrasound diagnosis of fatal anomalies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SHORT FEMUR

Nicolaides KH, Snijders RJ, Gosden CM, Berry C, Campbell

S. Ultrasonographically detectable markers of

fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Lancet 1992; 340:

704–7.

Sairam S, Al-Habib A, Sasson S, Thilaganathan B. Natural

history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on midtrimester

ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

2001; 17: 191–6.

Snijders RJ, Sebire NJ, Faria M, Patel F, Nicolaides KH.

Fetal mild hydronephrosis and chromosomal defects:

relation to maternal age and gestation. Fetal

Diagn Ther 1995; 10: 349–55.

Short Femur

Definition and clinical significance: This is defined

as length of femur below the 5th percentile

for the gestational age, or a ratio of BPD to femur

that lies above the 95th percentile. In Down syndrome,

short femur appears statistically more

often than in the normal chromosomal set. In addition,

shortened femur may be the first sign of

skeletal dysplasia.

Incidence: According to the above definition, 5%

of all fetuses.

Caution: The femur is not shortened significantly

in all cases of chromosomal aberrations,

especially in Down syndrome, in comparison

with a healthy fetus. The biological range and

possible inaccuracies in measurement are so extensive

that shortening of the femur or a pathological

BPD/femur ratio cannot be relied on as a

marker for detecting chromosomal aberration. If

the suspected finding is mentioned to the

mother, it causes such uncertainty that reassurance

is very difficult if karyotyping has not

been done. The question is what value should be

considered relevant for detecting Down syndrome.

Very wide variations from the normal

value should alert the physician to carry out

detailed scanning of the other structures. Even

then, for methodological reasons, chromosomal

aberration cannot be definitively excluded. The

parents should be counseled using computerized

risk assessment (developed by Nicolaides)

and risk for Down syndrome due to maternal

age. Nyberg et al. reported shortening of the

femur in only 14% of fetuses (seven of 49 cases)

with Down syndrome, compared to 6% of fetuses

(35 of 572) with normal chromosomes.

References

Ashkenazy M, Lurie S, Ben Itzhak I, Appelman Z, Caspi B.

Unilateral congenital short femur: a case report. Prenat

Diagn 1990; 10: 67–70.

Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto FDJ. Sonographic

identification of second-trimester fetuses with

Down’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1371–6.

Campbell J, Henderson A, Campbell S. The fetal femur/

foot length ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic

limb reduction. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 181–4.

Graham M. Congenital short femur: prenatal sonographic

diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4: 361–3.

Keret D, Timor IE. Familial congenital short femur: intrauterine

detection and follow-up by ultrasound: a

case report. Orthop Rev 1988; 17: 500–4.

LaFollette L, Filly RA, Anderson R, Golbus MS. Fetal

femur length to detect trisomy 21: a reappraisal. J Ultrasound

Med 1989; 8: 657–60.

Makino Y, Inoue T Shirota K, Kubota S, Kobayashi H,

Kawarabayashi T. A case of congenital familial short

femur diagnosed prenatally. Fetal Diagn Ther 1998;

13: 206–8.

Nyberg DA, Resta RG, Hickok DE, Hollenbach KA, Luthy

DA, Mahony BS. Femur length shortening in the detection

of Down syndrome: is prenatal screening

feasible? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1247–52.

Pierce BT, Hancock EG, Kovac CM, Napolitano PG, Hume

RF Jr, Calhoun BC. Influence of gestational age and

maternal height on fetal femur length calculations.

Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 742–6.

Ranzini AC, Guzman ER, Ananth CV, Day-Salvatore D,

Fisher AJ, Vintzileos AM. Sonographic identification

of fetuses with Down syndrome in the third

trimester: a matched control study. Obstet Gynecol

1999; 93: 702–6.

Snijders RJ, Platt LD, Greene N, et al. Femur length and

trisomy 21: impact of gestational age on screening

efficiency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 142–

5.

Sohl BD, Scioscia AL, Budorick NE, Moore TR. Utility of

minor ultrasonographic markers in the prediction of

abnormal fetal karyotype at a prenatal diagnostic

center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 898–903.

Twining P, Whalley DR, Lewin E, Foulkes K. Is a short

femur length a useful ultrasound marker for Down’s

syndrome? Br J Radiol 1991; 64: 990–2.

Vintzileos AM, Egan JF, Smulian JC, Campbell WA, Guzman

ER, Rodis JF. Adjusting the risk for trisomy 21 by

a simple ultrasound method using fetal long-bone

biometry. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 953–8.

3

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!