23.12.2012 Views

Nutrition Interventions for Children with Special Health Care Needs

Nutrition Interventions for Children with Special Health Care Needs

Nutrition Interventions for Children with Special Health Care Needs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 2 - Problem-Based <strong>Nutrition</strong> <strong>Interventions</strong><br />

Tangible Maintained Behavior: changing the timing.<br />

Ben was given a clean cloth diaper as a com<strong>for</strong>t item after each episode of reflux or<br />

other anxiety. His mother was taught to make the cloth available additionally as a<br />

rein<strong>for</strong>cer <strong>for</strong> allowing touch to his mouth and oral stimulation activities. In this way<br />

the rein<strong>for</strong>cing properties of the cloth were transferred to other therapeutic activities.<br />

Ben learned to tolerate many of the subskills he would need to progress to oral<br />

feeding in the future when his medical condition was resolved. We avoided allowing<br />

him to develop an escape response to touch to his mouth (1).<br />

Attention-Maintained Behavior: providing attention <strong>for</strong> food approach<br />

and ignoring food refusal.<br />

For Charlotte, attention was more pleasant than food. Refusing food had become a<br />

powerful way to gain attention. One appropriate response to this difficulty is to use<br />

contingent attention accurately. Contingent attention is powerful. It involves paying<br />

attention to the behaviors targeted <strong>for</strong> increase, and ignoring the behaviors targeted<br />

<strong>for</strong> decrease (1).<br />

In Charlotte’s situation, the therapist or parent would be directed to avert their eyes<br />

and stop talking until Charlotte displayed some type of approach response to food.<br />

This response might be defined initially as looking at the food or touching the food.<br />

Her most preferred foods would be used at first to make this approach response<br />

an easy one. Enthusiastic and specific praise would occur immediately upon the<br />

occurrence of the behavior. “Charlotte! You touched the bread! Good <strong>for</strong> you!” The<br />

therapist (or parent) would continue to talk to her and would touch her (if she found<br />

touch pleasant) as long as she continued to interact <strong>with</strong> the food. Over time, the<br />

required response would change based on the task analysis of the target behavior.<br />

Attention would be delivered only when she picked up the food, smelled it, licked<br />

it, or held it in her mouth. These types of carefully graduated changes are called<br />

shaping techniques. Eventually, only swallowing would be rein<strong>for</strong>ced (3).<br />

Modeling would be utilized to prompt each new targeted behavior. Hand-over-hand<br />

prompting or some lesser degree of prompting would be utilized if Charlotte did not<br />

exhibit the targeted behavior independently. Such prompting would be appropriate<br />

only if it was determined that the target behavior was an appropriately small change<br />

and that prompting it was unlikely to trigger significant anxiety. Adding a tangible<br />

rein<strong>for</strong>cer to the contingency, such as access to a preferred toy <strong>for</strong> brief intervals,<br />

can strengthen the effects of contingent attention (3).<br />

<strong>Nutrition</strong> <strong>Interventions</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Children</strong> With <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Needs</strong> 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!