08.01.2022 Views

Mathematical_Recreations-Kraitchik-2e

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Numerical Pastimes 53

If the standard weights may be placed in one scale pan

only, the first set alone gives the answer. For every number

from 1 to 40 can be represented as a sum of multiples by 0 or

1 of the successive powers of 2 from the Oth (= 1) to the 5th

(= 32). In fact, all numbers from 1 to 63 can be so represented.

If the standard weights may be placed in either pan, then

the second set gives a more economical solution, both in the

number of the standard weights and in their total weight.

For every number from 1 to 40 may be represented as a sum

of multiples by 0, 1, or -1 of the successive powers of 3 from

the Oth to the 3rd.

Bachet's solution is correct but not complete. It was completed

by Major MacMahon, who generalized the medieval

problem and posed it as follows:

Find all sets of standard weights, not necessarily unequal,

with which one can weigh every whole number of pounds

from 1 to n, in each of the following cases: (1) If the standard

weights may be placed in only one scale pan. (2) If the

standard weights may be placed in either scale pan.

MacMahon added two other conditions: (a) It is not permissible

to measure additional weights with the set of standard

weights.

(b) Each weight can be measured in just one

way with these standard weights.

The solution of MacMahon's problem is based on the following

theorem:

Let a product

(1+ x+ x2 + ... + x .. ) (1 + x+ x2 + .,. + xn)

(1+ x+ x 2 + ... + x p )

be written as a polynomial,

1+ Ax+ Bx 2 + Cx 3 +

Then the coefficient oj any particular power oj x, say oj x", in

the expanded product is the total number oj different ways in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!