The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

Recommendations

Info

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1.29 0.09 0.41 158 Appendix B 1.74 1.12 AMAD (3/725) All 6000ers (20/1784) Deadliest 6000m Peaks for Hired (1950-2006) (Adjusted Wald 95% Confidence Intervals) Chart D-7: Hired death rates for selected 6000m peaks with 10+ hired above base camp from 1950-2006 Hired Above BC 17.85 3.23 Death Count Survival Count Death Rate 95% Confidence Interval Yates' Chi Square Lower Upper p-value Ama Dablam 725 3 722 0.41 0.09 1.29 0.034 All 6000ers 1784 20 1764 1.12 0.72 1.74 16.49 0.72 0.53 Kantega 31 1 30 3.23 0.00 17.85 0.793 Leonpo Gang 43 2 41 4.65 0.53 16.49 0.136 Cheo Himal 10 1 9 10.00 0.00 42.92 0.243 Raksha Urai 10 1 9 10.00 0.00 42.92 0.243 Kang Guru 68 11 57 16.18 9.17 26.94
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2.38 1.35 1.80 All 7000ers (39/2632) 4.75 0.74 BARU (5/251) 1.99 12.58 2.17 PK29 (1/46) 8.51 0.66 Deadliest 7000m Peaks for Hired (1950-2006) (Adjusted Wald 95% Confidence Intervals) 2.86 MAK2 (3/105) 9.75 0.77 HIME (3/91) Chart D-8: Hired death rates for selected 7000m peaks with 25+ hired above base camp from 1950-2006 Hired Above BC 3.30 12.57 ANNS (2/58) Death Count 0.34 0.35 Survival Count Death Rate 95% Confidence Interval Yates' Chi Square Lower Upper p-value All 7000ers 2674 48 2626 1.80 1.35 2.38 3.45 12.77 DHA2 (2/57) Baruntse 251 5 246 1.99 0.74 4.75 0.933 Peak 29 46 1 45 2.17 0.00 12.58 0.715 Makalu II 105 3 102 2.86 0.66 8.51 0.644 Himalchuli East 91 3 88 3.30 0.77 9.75 0.486 Annapurna South 58 2 56 3.45 0.34 12.57 0.647 Dhaulagiri II 57 2 55 3.51 0.35 12.77 0.631 Pumori 251 9 242 3.59 1.82 6.81 0.046 Fang 26 1 25 3.85 0.00 20.74 0.964 Langtang Lirung 81 4 77 4.94 1.61 12.50 0.082 Churen Himal West 38 2 36 5.26 0.65 18.40 0.314 Dhaulagiri IV 61 5 56 8.20 3.23 18.31
Page 3 and 4:
The Himalaya by the Numbers A Stati
Page 5:
Contents Introduction . . . . . . .
Page 8 and 9:
the first north-south traverses. Th
Page 10 and 11:
in the charts, 2 or 3-period moving
Page 12 and 13:
400 300 200 100 0 2000 1800 1600 14
Page 14 and 15:
2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 6
Page 16 and 17:
government starting in 1997 opened
Page 18 and 19:
500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100
Page 20 and 21:
them. In fact during the late 1980s
Page 22 and 23:
During the 1960s and early 1970s, e
Page 24 and 25:
250 200 150 100 50 0 250 200 150 10
Page 26 and 27:
100 75 50 25 0 1970 1971 1972 1973
Page 28 and 29:
a few brave and hardy souls are wil
Page 30 and 31:
900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
Page 32 and 33:
Charts C-7a-c show the seasonal pat
Page 34 and 35:
1000 800 600 400 200 100 80 60 40 2
Page 36 and 37:
closeness of the Himalaya. Many Jap
Page 38 and 39:
For all peaks, the average team mem
Page 40 and 41:
Periodically, massive storms fueled
Page 42 and 43:
40 Analysis of Climbing Activity
Page 44 and 45:
three most popular peaks, Ama Dabla
Page 46 and 47:
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 11.7 ANN1 (121/
Page 48 and 49:
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 7.7 11.7 T
Page 50 and 51:
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 40 35 30 25
Page 52 and 53:
The results indicate that the sprin
Page 54 and 55:
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 30 25 20 15
Page 56 and 57:
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 70 60 50 40
Page 58 and 59:
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 80 70 60 5
Page 60 and 61:
100 60 50 40 30 20 10 90 80 70 60 5
Page 62 and 63:
Ascents by Citizenship Table A-24 s
Page 64 and 65:
Ascents by Gender Table and Chart A
Page 66 and 67:
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Chart A-27: Asc
Page 68 and 69:
had a hard time making her own plat
Page 70 and 71:
60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Page 72 and 73:
900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
Page 74 and 75:
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 80 70 60 50 40
Page 76 and 77:
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 60 50 40 30
Page 78 and 79:
Peak ID Peak Name Height Region 76
Page 80 and 81:
Members have higher percentage of a
Page 82 and 83:
considerable effort through deep sn
Page 84 and 85:
3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2.5
Page 86 and 87:
3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 0 The
Page 88 and 89:
Deadliest Peaks for Members The nex
Page 90 and 91:
when five Austrians and their Sherp
Page 92 and 93:
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 4.5 4.0 3.5
Page 94 and 95:
days in 1975 (the first verified as
Page 96 and 97:
Whether significant or not, the dea
Page 98 and 99:
and higher spring death rates on Ma
Page 100 and 101:
of an autumn 1992 Makalu II expedit
Page 102 and 103:
a climb. For hired, falls were the
Page 104 and 105:
Summit and the Hillary Step (9 of 2
Page 106 and 107:
summer season as very few climbers
Page 108 and 109:
2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 106 Death A
Page 110 and 111: 100 20 18 16 14 12 10 90 80 70 60 5
Page 112 and 113: Deaths by Falling While avalanching
Page 114 and 115: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 16 14 12 10
Page 116 and 117: Time of Day All Peaks 6000ers All F
Page 118 and 119: Deaths by Physiological Causes Phys
Page 120 and 121: Deaths by Age Groups Table and Char
Page 122 and 123: Deaths by Expedition Years Chart D-
Page 124 and 125: All Peaks Everest Citizenship Above
Page 126 and 127: 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 10.0 9.0 8.
Page 128 and 129: Table and Chart D-42 below show mem
Page 130 and 131: Table and Chart D-44 below show mem
Page 132 and 133: Everest, Spring 1996 A total of eig
Page 134 and 135: On the evening of 6th it started to
Page 136 and 137: camp at 7500m but there was nothing
Page 138 and 139: Peak ID Peak Name 136 Appendix A Al
Page 148 and 149: 146 Appendix A
Page 150 and 151: In Chart D-4, the sample sizes are
Page 152 and 153: 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 32.2 2
Page 154 and 155: 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 11.9 4.
Page 156 and 157: 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1.16 0.43 0.13 BARU (
Page 158 and 159: 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2.42 1.80 700
Page 162 and 163: 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 3.04 0.0 LSHR (0/
Page 164: 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
show all

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?