24.12.2012 Views

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

23.1<br />

324<br />

31.7<br />

407<br />

For all peaks without Everest, <strong>the</strong> most successful team size was 2-3 members with an<br />

ascent rate of 37.8%, but only 2075 members that went above base camp were in teams<br />

of this size. Teams of 6-7 members sent <strong>the</strong> most members above base camp (5311), but<br />

had a lower ascent rate of 28.0%. <strong>The</strong> spike at team size 28-31 with a 46.0% ascent rate<br />

is due to <strong>the</strong> three large Ama Dablam and Kangchenjunga expeditions discussed above.<br />

For Everest, <strong>the</strong> most successful team size again was 2-3 members with an ascent rate<br />

of 31.7%, but only 407 members that went above base camp were in teams of this size.<br />

Teams of 10-11 and 16-19 members sent <strong>the</strong> most members above base camp (874 and<br />

866), but had lower ascent rates (21.4% and 16.2%).<br />

Average Expedition Duration and Days to Summit<br />

Charts A-34a-g show average duration (<strong>the</strong> time from arrival at base to departure from<br />

base camp) for successful expeditions (<strong>the</strong> blue lines in <strong>the</strong> charts ) and <strong>the</strong> average<br />

number of days taken to reach <strong>the</strong> team’s first summit (<strong>the</strong> green lines) for <strong>the</strong> period<br />

from 1970 to 2006. <strong>The</strong>se charts show <strong>the</strong> times for all peaks, <strong>the</strong> 6000ers, 7000ers,<br />

and 8000ers, Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest. <strong>The</strong>y may be used as indicator of<br />

how long an expedition should plan to be on <strong>the</strong> mountain in order to succeed in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

summit quest. <strong>The</strong> quickest and longest time for each peak are given in Table A-36.<br />

<strong>The</strong> quickest times should not be confused with speed ascents, which are usually done<br />

several days or weeks after arrival at base camp and after proper acclimatization has<br />

been completed.<br />

70 Ascent <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Members Above BC and Ascent Rates <strong>by</strong> Member Team Size For Everest<br />

(1950-2006)<br />

525<br />

27.0<br />

823<br />

26.2<br />

836<br />

26.0<br />

874<br />

21.4<br />

Chart A-33: Ascent rates <strong>by</strong> member team size for Everest from 1950-2006<br />

(<strong>the</strong> horizontal scale is <strong>the</strong> member team size; <strong>the</strong> green line is <strong>the</strong><br />

total number of members above BC for each team size increment;<br />

<strong>the</strong> red line is <strong>the</strong> ascent rate for each team size increment)<br />

766<br />

25.1<br />

682<br />

19.4<br />

866<br />

679<br />

21.9<br />

26.1<br />

440<br />

275<br />

16.2 16.0 13.3<br />

1 2- 3 4- 5 6- 7 8- 9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-19 20-23 24-27 28-31 32-35<br />

Members Above BC (left scale) Ascent Rate (right scale)<br />

105<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!