The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
900<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
23.1<br />
324<br />
31.7<br />
407<br />
For all peaks without Everest, <strong>the</strong> most successful team size was 2-3 members with an<br />
ascent rate of 37.8%, but only 2075 members that went above base camp were in teams<br />
of this size. Teams of 6-7 members sent <strong>the</strong> most members above base camp (5311), but<br />
had a lower ascent rate of 28.0%. <strong>The</strong> spike at team size 28-31 with a 46.0% ascent rate<br />
is due to <strong>the</strong> three large Ama Dablam and Kangchenjunga expeditions discussed above.<br />
For Everest, <strong>the</strong> most successful team size again was 2-3 members with an ascent rate<br />
of 31.7%, but only 407 members that went above base camp were in teams of this size.<br />
Teams of 10-11 and 16-19 members sent <strong>the</strong> most members above base camp (874 and<br />
866), but had lower ascent rates (21.4% and 16.2%).<br />
Average Expedition Duration and Days to Summit<br />
Charts A-34a-g show average duration (<strong>the</strong> time from arrival at base to departure from<br />
base camp) for successful expeditions (<strong>the</strong> blue lines in <strong>the</strong> charts ) and <strong>the</strong> average<br />
number of days taken to reach <strong>the</strong> team’s first summit (<strong>the</strong> green lines) for <strong>the</strong> period<br />
from 1970 to 2006. <strong>The</strong>se charts show <strong>the</strong> times for all peaks, <strong>the</strong> 6000ers, 7000ers,<br />
and 8000ers, Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest. <strong>The</strong>y may be used as indicator of<br />
how long an expedition should plan to be on <strong>the</strong> mountain in order to succeed in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
summit quest. <strong>The</strong> quickest and longest time for each peak are given in Table A-36.<br />
<strong>The</strong> quickest times should not be confused with speed ascents, which are usually done<br />
several days or weeks after arrival at base camp and after proper acclimatization has<br />
been completed.<br />
70 Ascent <strong>Analysis</strong><br />
Members Above BC and Ascent Rates <strong>by</strong> Member Team Size For Everest<br />
(1950-2006)<br />
525<br />
27.0<br />
823<br />
26.2<br />
836<br />
26.0<br />
874<br />
21.4<br />
Chart A-33: Ascent rates <strong>by</strong> member team size for Everest from 1950-2006<br />
(<strong>the</strong> horizontal scale is <strong>the</strong> member team size; <strong>the</strong> green line is <strong>the</strong><br />
total number of members above BC for each team size increment;<br />
<strong>the</strong> red line is <strong>the</strong> ascent rate for each team size increment)<br />
766<br />
25.1<br />
682<br />
19.4<br />
866<br />
679<br />
21.9<br />
26.1<br />
440<br />
275<br />
16.2 16.0 13.3<br />
1 2- 3 4- 5 6- 7 8- 9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-19 20-23 24-27 28-31 32-35<br />
Members Above BC (left scale) Ascent Rate (right scale)<br />
105<br />
60.0<br />
50.0<br />
40.0<br />
30.0<br />
20.0<br />
10.0<br />
0.0