24.12.2012 Views

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

days in 1975 (<strong>the</strong> first verified ascents of <strong>the</strong> peak), <strong>the</strong> peak has never been attempted<br />

again.<br />

Chart D-9 shows hired death rates for <strong>the</strong> 8000m peaks with 75 or more hired above<br />

base camp. <strong>The</strong> most deadly 8000m peaks are Annapurna I, Dhaulagiri I, and Manaslu<br />

with death rates significantly higher than <strong>the</strong> mean death rate of 1.35% for all 8000ers.<br />

Everest and Lhotse have death rates significantly lower than <strong>the</strong> mean. <strong>The</strong> hired<br />

death rate of 0.0% Lhotse Shar is particularly striking since <strong>the</strong> member death rate of<br />

4.27% is <strong>the</strong> highest for <strong>the</strong> 8000ers (see Chart D-6). Lhotse Shar is more demanding<br />

technically, so expeditions tend not to use as many hired personnel at <strong>the</strong> higher<br />

altitudes where <strong>the</strong> danger of falls and avalanches is greater; but due to <strong>the</strong> few hired<br />

used, <strong>the</strong> low death rate is also not statistically significant. Cho Oyu is close to <strong>the</strong><br />

limit of being significant.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mean death rates for hired personnel are almost identical for both <strong>the</strong> 7000m<br />

and 8000m peaks. <strong>The</strong> reason for this will become more apparent in <strong>the</strong> discussion of<br />

avalanche deaths later in this chapter.<br />

Deaths <strong>by</strong> Geographical Regions<br />

Chart D-10 shows death rates <strong>by</strong> geographical region. <strong>The</strong> Khumbu-Rolwaling-Makalu<br />

region where <strong>the</strong> most climbing activity has taken place is also <strong>the</strong> safest. <strong>The</strong> most<br />

dangerous regions are in central Nepal from Langtang-Jugal to Dhaulagiri-Mukut,<br />

which is more prone to avalanching. <strong>The</strong> Manaslu-Ganesh region has almost three<br />

times <strong>the</strong> member death rate as <strong>the</strong> Khumbu region.<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

1.23<br />

1.07<br />

Khumbu-<br />

Rolwaling-Makalu<br />

277/22542(M),<br />

111/10369(H)<br />

1.64<br />

Chart D-10: Death rates <strong>by</strong> geographical region for all peaks from 1950-2006<br />

(<strong>the</strong> death rate is above <strong>the</strong> column bar; <strong>the</strong> death and above BC counts are below)<br />

92 Death <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

1.40<br />

All Peaks<br />

571/34920(M),<br />

211/15031(H)<br />

Deaths Rates <strong>by</strong> Geographical Region (1950-2006)<br />

1.70<br />

0.99<br />

Kanjiroba-FarWest<br />

9/528(M),<br />

2/202(H)<br />

1.75<br />

1.15<br />

Kangchenjunga-<br />

Janak<br />

40/2290(M),<br />

10/873(H)<br />

2.31<br />

2.21<br />

Dhaulagiri-Mukut<br />

67/2900(M),<br />

25/1129(H)<br />

Members Hired<br />

2.41<br />

2.34<br />

Langtang-Jugal<br />

17/728(M),<br />

7/290(H)<br />

2.34<br />

2.88<br />

Annapurna-<br />

Damodar-Peri<br />

92/3931(M),<br />

39/1353(H)<br />

3.45<br />

2.09<br />

Manaslu-Ganesh<br />

69/2001(M),<br />

17/815(H)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!