The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> results indicate that <strong>the</strong> spring season is more favorable in <strong>the</strong> central and far<br />
eastern regions of Nepal, areas that are prone to heavy snowfall and avalanching,<br />
while <strong>the</strong> autumn season is more favorable in <strong>the</strong> Khumbu-Makalu-Rolwaling and<br />
in <strong>the</strong> western regions of Nepal. <strong>The</strong> Khumbu region is still slightly more favorable<br />
in autumn when <strong>the</strong> expeditions to Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest are factored<br />
out (Ama Dablam and Cho Oyu are best in autumn while Everest is best in spring as<br />
shown in Table A-8).<br />
Table and Chart A-9b show member ascent counts and rates <strong>by</strong> season broken out <strong>by</strong><br />
geographic regions for <strong>the</strong> 6000m and 7000m peaks.<br />
When only peaks under 8000m are considered, only <strong>the</strong> Annapurna-Damodar-Peri and<br />
Langtang-Jugal regions remain significantly more favorable in <strong>the</strong> spring since <strong>the</strong><br />
Manaslu-Ganesh and Kangchenjunga-Janak regions are skewed <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> higher spring<br />
success rates on Manaslu and Kangchenjunga (see Charts A-8 and 9a). <strong>The</strong> Dhaulagiri-<br />
Mukut region becomes significantly more favorable in <strong>the</strong> autumn when <strong>the</strong> high<br />
spring success rate on Dhaulagiri I is factored out. <strong>The</strong> Khumbu-Makalu-Rolwaling<br />
region is neutral when Ama Dablam is omitted.<br />
Ascents <strong>by</strong> Expedition Years<br />
Chart A-10 shows member ascent rates <strong>by</strong> expedition years in 5-year steps for all<br />
peaks.<br />
<strong>The</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> early years from 1950 to 1970 are more erratic due to <strong>the</strong> lower<br />
numbers of expeditions, especially in <strong>the</strong> late 1960s when <strong>Himalaya</strong>n climbing was<br />
suspended in Nepal and before <strong>the</strong> Chinese side of <strong>the</strong> border was opened to foreign<br />
climbers in 1980. From <strong>the</strong> 1970s onward, <strong>the</strong> data in Chart A-10 show more consistent<br />
results as <strong>the</strong> trend lines show a steady increase in member ascents and ascent rates<br />
for all peaks combined.<br />
Chart A-11 shows member ascent rates over time broken out <strong>by</strong> altitude. <strong>The</strong> rates for<br />
<strong>the</strong> 6000ers and 7000ers are relatively even, 40-50% for <strong>the</strong> 6000ers and 20-25% for <strong>the</strong><br />
7000ers. Only for <strong>the</strong> 8000ers has <strong>the</strong>re been a steady increase since 1970, starting at<br />
about 7% in 1970 and increasing to 40% after 2000.<br />
Charts A-12 through A-14 give a more detailed view of member ascent rates since 1970<br />
when segregating out <strong>the</strong> ACE commercial routes. <strong>The</strong>se commercial peaks show a<br />
more rapid increase in ascent rates during <strong>the</strong> last 15 years. For <strong>the</strong> 6000ers, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
actually has been a decrease in ascent rates when Ama Dablam is removed, possibly<br />
due to recent emphasis on exploratory expeditions to <strong>the</strong> newly opened 6000m peaks.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> 8000ers, <strong>the</strong>re has been an increase in ascent rates for peaks o<strong>the</strong>r than Cho<br />
Oyu and Everest, most likely due to <strong>the</strong> increasing interest in climbing all of <strong>the</strong><br />
fourteen 8000ers.<br />
Chart A-15 shows member ascent rates for only <strong>the</strong> commercial routes on Ama<br />
Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest since 1990.<br />
Charts A-16 through A-18 compare member ascent rates on Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu,<br />
and Everest for <strong>the</strong> commercial routes and <strong>the</strong> non-commercial routes since 1970. Only<br />
Everest shows an increase in member ascent rates for <strong>the</strong> non-commercial routes.<br />
50 Ascent <strong>Analysis</strong>