The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.0<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
0 0<br />
<strong>The</strong> death rates for Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest are lower than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
peaks in <strong>the</strong>ir respective altitude ranges suggesting that <strong>the</strong>y are relatively safer.<br />
But this appearance of safety may be due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> vast majority of <strong>the</strong><br />
climbers are on <strong>the</strong> easiest and safest routes and in many cases under <strong>the</strong> supervision<br />
of experienced commercial guides or Sherpas. During <strong>the</strong> 1950-1989 period before<br />
commercial climbing become common and when o<strong>the</strong>r more challenging routes were<br />
being attempted in higher proportions, <strong>the</strong> death rates on Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and<br />
Everest were much higher.<br />
Deaths on Popular Peaks<br />
Table and Chart D-3 give <strong>the</strong> death rates for <strong>the</strong> most popular peaks in Nepal, those<br />
peaks with more than 750 members above base camp (roughly equivalent to 75 or more<br />
expeditions).<br />
Ama Dablam and Cho Oyu are significantly safer for members than <strong>the</strong> mean (average)<br />
of 1.64% for all peaks (in black), while Everest is very close to <strong>the</strong> mean for all peak.<br />
For two o<strong>the</strong>r peaks that are often climbed commercially, Baruntse is very safe at<br />
0.43% while Pumori is more dangerous at 2.55%.<br />
84 Death <strong>Analysis</strong><br />
Death Rates <strong>by</strong> Peak Altitude (1990-2006)<br />
(with and w/o Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu and Everest commercial routes)<br />
(and without 2005 Kang Guru accident)<br />
0.30<br />
0.56<br />
0.33<br />
0.78<br />
1.03<br />
2.24<br />
6000-6499m 6500-6999m 7000-7499m 7500-7999m 8000-8499m 8500-8850m<br />
Members (1990-2006) with All Routes Hired (1990-2006) with All Routes<br />
Members (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes Hired (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes<br />
Trend (Members (1990-2006) with All Routes) Trend (Hired (1990-2006) with All Routes)<br />
Trend (Members (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes) Trend (Hired (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes)<br />
Chart D-2: Member and hired death rates from 1990-2006 with<br />
Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest commercial routes separated out<br />
and excluding <strong>the</strong> 2005 Kang Guru accident<br />
(<strong>the</strong> dashed moving averages are inserted from Chart D-1b)<br />
1.48<br />
0<br />
1.22<br />
1.32<br />
2.25<br />
2.77<br />
1.44<br />
0.69<br />
1.51<br />
0.80