24.12.2012 Views

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

0 0<br />

<strong>The</strong> death rates for Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest are lower than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

peaks in <strong>the</strong>ir respective altitude ranges suggesting that <strong>the</strong>y are relatively safer.<br />

But this appearance of safety may be due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> vast majority of <strong>the</strong><br />

climbers are on <strong>the</strong> easiest and safest routes and in many cases under <strong>the</strong> supervision<br />

of experienced commercial guides or Sherpas. During <strong>the</strong> 1950-1989 period before<br />

commercial climbing become common and when o<strong>the</strong>r more challenging routes were<br />

being attempted in higher proportions, <strong>the</strong> death rates on Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and<br />

Everest were much higher.<br />

Deaths on Popular Peaks<br />

Table and Chart D-3 give <strong>the</strong> death rates for <strong>the</strong> most popular peaks in Nepal, those<br />

peaks with more than 750 members above base camp (roughly equivalent to 75 or more<br />

expeditions).<br />

Ama Dablam and Cho Oyu are significantly safer for members than <strong>the</strong> mean (average)<br />

of 1.64% for all peaks (in black), while Everest is very close to <strong>the</strong> mean for all peak.<br />

For two o<strong>the</strong>r peaks that are often climbed commercially, Baruntse is very safe at<br />

0.43% while Pumori is more dangerous at 2.55%.<br />

84 Death <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Death Rates <strong>by</strong> Peak Altitude (1990-2006)<br />

(with and w/o Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu and Everest commercial routes)<br />

(and without 2005 Kang Guru accident)<br />

0.30<br />

0.56<br />

0.33<br />

0.78<br />

1.03<br />

2.24<br />

6000-6499m 6500-6999m 7000-7499m 7500-7999m 8000-8499m 8500-8850m<br />

Members (1990-2006) with All Routes Hired (1990-2006) with All Routes<br />

Members (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes Hired (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes<br />

Trend (Members (1990-2006) with All Routes) Trend (Hired (1990-2006) with All Routes)<br />

Trend (Members (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes) Trend (Hired (1990-2006) w/o ACE Com Routes)<br />

Chart D-2: Member and hired death rates from 1990-2006 with<br />

Ama Dablam, Cho Oyu, and Everest commercial routes separated out<br />

and excluding <strong>the</strong> 2005 Kang Guru accident<br />

(<strong>the</strong> dashed moving averages are inserted from Chart D-1b)<br />

1.48<br />

0<br />

1.22<br />

1.32<br />

2.25<br />

2.77<br />

1.44<br />

0.69<br />

1.51<br />

0.80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!