24.12.2012 Views

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

The Himalaya by the Numbers: A Statistical Analysis - Himalayan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Chart A-8: Member ascent rates for selected peaks <strong>by</strong> season from 1950-2006<br />

(ranked from left to right <strong>by</strong> favorability from spring to autumn)<br />

<strong>The</strong> columns outlined in black in <strong>the</strong> above and following charts represent seasons that statistically<br />

have significantly higher ascent rates than <strong>the</strong> corresponding season for that region.<br />

48 Ascent <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

Member Ascent Rates for Popular Peaks <strong>by</strong> Season (1950-2006)<br />

EVER MAKA MANA ANN1 KANG DHA1 LHOT 8000ers All Peaks PUMO 7000ers CHOY 6000ers BARU AMAD<br />

Spring Autumn<br />

Regional Member Ascent Rates <strong>by</strong> Season for All Peaks (1950-2006)<br />

Kanjiroba-Far West Dhaulagiri-Mukut Annapurna-<br />

Damodar-Peri<br />

Manaslu-Ganesh Langtang-Jugal Khumbu-Makalu-<br />

Rolwaling<br />

Spring Autumn<br />

Khumbu-Mak-Rolw<br />

w/o AMAD, EVER,<br />

CHOY Com Rtes<br />

Chart A-9a: Regional member ascent rates <strong>by</strong> season for all peaks from 1950-2006<br />

Kangchenjunga-<br />

Janak

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!