10.05.2022 Views

CHINA ARQUEOLOGIA golden-age-chinese-archayeolog

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

some precise metaphysical idea but to produce a self-sustaining version of the world — a fictive

and efficacious reality. The practical constraints of such image-making must have played a decisive

role in the creation of the First Emperor s necropolis. For how, after all, does one reproduce

"all the myriad waterways," 13 or the requisite personnel and materiel of an entire army? How

does one supervise the countless logistic, technological, and aesthetic problems implicated

in re-creating the world?

Supported by the unparalleled power and economic resources of the state and using all

available representational modes and strategies, the First Emperor s necropolis could have been

created as a comprehensive replica of the real world. Chinese tombs and burials signified the

power and status of their builders and occupants: during the Bronze Age, the ability to sacrifice

the lives of retainers, soldiers, concubines, or animals, or to put precious articles into the tomb

constituted a sign of power; by the Qin period, the ability to have them depicted — possessing

the aesthetic, cognitive, technological, and economic resources to reproduce the world —

became a more efficient way of asserting power and status.

The terra-cotta army and the Lintong necropolis show that complex representation is not

a result or fulfillment of some preconceived religious doctrine, nor a mirror of Qin ideology.

Rather, the most consistent ideas regarding the afterlife are to be found in the tombs and monuments

themselves, where current metaphysical and religious conceptions intersected with

personal wishes and anxieties and were transformed by the practical constraints and conditions

of making the afterlife a material reality. 14 LK

1 For a detailed treatment of the various aspects of the

terra-cotta army, see the report on the excavation of Pit i,

Shaanxi 1988!); Yuan 1990; Wang 19943; Ledderose and

Schlombs 1990, and Kesner 1995, all of which contain

extensive references to further sources.

2 Wu 1995,114-17. For a reconstruction of the Lishan

necropolis see Yuan 1990,1-63; Wang 1994!?; Yang 1985;

Thorp 19833 and bibliographies therein.

3 Shasnxi 1991.

4 Yusn 1990, 36; Wsng 1987, 41 - 42.

5 Wang 19943,1-24.

6 The stylistic sspects of the figures 3re discussed in Kesner

1995-

7 See Hu 1987 and Sun 1996. For granaries see Ledderose

and Schlombs 1990,164-77.

8 See, for example, Hubei 1984, pis. 69-71; Hensn 1986, pis.

106-108.

9 For the concept of mingqi, see Cai 1986 and discussion in

Kesner 1995,116-117, w^n further references.

10 Falkenhausen 1990; Falkenhsusen 1994; Poo 1998,157-177.

11 Poo 1998,176 - 77.

12 Fslkenhausen 1994.

13 Poo 1988,176 -177.

14 This is more fully developed in Kesner 1995 and Kesner

1996.

369 | TERRA-COTTA ARMY, LINTONC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!