10.05.2022 Views

CHINA ARQUEOLOGIA golden-age-chinese-archayeolog

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mainly in northern China, and we have evidence that copper dominated the metallurgy of

cultures that were contemporaneous with the Xia dynasty. No copper object dating prior to the

Xia dynasty has been found to date in the lower Yangzi region. Among the Erlitou culture — the

most advanced of its contemporary cultures in metalworking — bronzes constitute 83 percent

of metal objects. Bronzes similarly dominate metal objects unearthed from a burial site of the

Siba culture at Huoshaoguo (71.8 percent); by contrast, copper dominates the metal objects

excavated from another burial site of the Siba culture—at Donghuishan, Minghe. Cultural contacts

between China and the West began during the Xia period, but copper objects were made

and used in China more than 1000 years prior; the transition to the Bronze Age in China was

in fact fully realized in the second millennium BCE. These data indicate that copper and bronze

metallurgy in China were indigenous inventions, and there is evidence as well that many ancient

cultures in China developed copper metallurgy and made the transition from copper to

bronze independent of one another.

We have evidence that villages were a form of social organization as early as the Laoguantai

culture (c. 6000 BCE). Data regarding social organization prior to the Laoguantai period are

sparse, and we know little about the structure of small settlements or about how villages came

into being. We know that around 6000 BCE, clans were the predominant form of social organization;

kinship and property were transmitted matrilineally. A thousand years later (c. 5000

BCE), we find society organized in three levels: household, clan, and tribe; households were matrilineal

and functioned relatively independently of the clan. By the time of the Xiyin culture

(c. 4000 BCE), the matrilineal system of household organization and transmission of property

had been replaced by a patrilineal system, a system that characterizes Phase IV of the Banpo

culture (c. 3200 BCE) and finds its full expression around 2200 BCE with the appearance of

polygamous burials.

The identification of the origins of "Chinese civilization" have been a hotly debated matter

since the mid-KjSos. Early China was characterized by two distinct patterns of social and

economic organization, one based on agriculture and the other on herding. Herding was concentrated

in the region currently defined by the Great Wall; to the west, herding developed out

of agriculture, while to the east it developed out of a hunting and gathering economy. The

herding civilization did not develop until the Xia period (and is thus outside the scope of this

article). What follows concentrates on "agricultural civilization."

Elements of civilization necessarily predate the formation of civilization itself. Scholars

generally agree on two points: that Chinese civilization can be traced back to several points of

origin that followed parallel lines of development, with contacts and mutual influences; and

that different cultures developed at different rates. Increasingly scholars have identified the

study of the origins and formation of civilization with guozhi dashi zai siyu rong ("ritual and war

are the most important business of the state"), rather than simply characterizing early civilization

as a society founded on slavery. Though situating the formation of civilization in time

524 | ZHANG ZHONCPEI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!