26.12.2012 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

achieved. An analogous satellite underflight calibration experiment was performed with AVIRIS <strong>and</strong> the Optical Sensor (OPS)<br />

onboard the Japanese Earth Resources Satellite (JERS).<br />

Derived from text<br />

Intercalibration; Imaging Spectrometers; Infrared Spectrometers; Ocean Color Scanner; Remote Sensors; Earth Observations<br />

(From Space)<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0064697 Texas Univ., William B. Hanson Center for Space Studies, Dallas, TX USA<br />

Ion Mass Spectrometer for Sporadic-E Rocket Experiments<br />

Heelis, R. A., Texas Univ., USA; Earle, G. D., Texas Univ., USA; Pfaff, Robert, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA;<br />

[<strong>2000</strong>]; 13p; In English<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAG5-5086<br />

Report No.(s): UTD-FINS-630635; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

NASA grant NAG5-5086 provided funding for the William B. Hanson Center for Space Sciences at the University of Texas<br />

at Dallas (UTD) to design, fabricate, calibrate, <strong>and</strong> ultimately fly two ion mass spectrometer instruments on a pair of sounding<br />

rocket payloads. Drs. R.A. Heelis <strong>and</strong> G.D. Earle from UTD were co-investigators on the project. The principal investigator for<br />

both rocket experiments was Dr. Robert Pfaff of the Goddard Space Flight Center. The overall project title was ”Rocket/Radar<br />

Investigation of Lower Ionospheric Electrodynamics Associated with Intense Mid-Latitude Sporadic-E Layers”. This report<br />

describes the overall objectives of the project, summarizes the instrument design <strong>and</strong> flight experiment details, <strong>and</strong> presents representative<br />

data obtained during the flights.<br />

Derived from text<br />

Mass Spectrometers; Fabrication; <strong>Aerospace</strong> Engineering; Sounding Rockets; Aerodynamics<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0065618 Institute for Human Factors TNO, Soesterberg, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Evaluation of CCD Camera Systems for the Fennek Vehicle Final Report Evaluatie van CCD Camera’s Ten Behoeve van<br />

de Fennek<br />

Valeton, J. M., Institute for Human Factors TNO, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s; Kooi, F. L., Institute for Human Factors TNO, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s; Bijl,<br />

P., Institute for Human Factors TNO, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s; Aug. 25, 1999; 40p; In Dutch<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): A98/KL/317; TNO Proj. 786.1<br />

Report No.(s): TD-99-0335; TM-99-A057; Copyright; Avail: Issuing Activity<br />

The usefulness of a number of CCD camera systems for the German/Dutch Fennek observation pod has been explored in a<br />

field test. The observation capabilities (target detection, recognition, <strong>and</strong> identification) for stationary vehicles at a known, distant<br />

location were measured. Seven camera-display combinations have been directly compared to determine the effect of the following<br />

parameters: 1. type of camera (Fennek, RGB reference with contrast-stretching, i-Sight) 2. color versus back-<strong>and</strong>-white 3. field<br />

of view (2.5 deg: wide field-of-view, 0.9 deg: narrow field-of-view) 4. display size (9”, 14”). The observer task in the field experiment<br />

was target identification. The experimental design was such that recognition <strong>and</strong> ’detection’ performance could be obtained<br />

from the identification scores. NOTE: this ’detection’ performance concerns determining whether a target is present at a certain,<br />

known location, <strong>and</strong> is therefore different from the detection in a search task. Target search was not investigated in this study. The<br />

results indicate how the camera system presently used in the Fennek could be improved for target identification. The display size<br />

has no effect on the scores. The ’detection’, recognition, <strong>and</strong> identification scores with the RGB reference camera are 10% to 15%<br />

higher, due to the 20% better resolution <strong>and</strong> the contrast-stretching. The 2.7 times stronger tele-lens (narrow field-of-view)<br />

improves the scores by 20%. Color improves the recognition <strong>and</strong> identification of the vehicles by 7% to 10% but has no effect<br />

on detection. to summarize, of the four variables the field-of-view has the largest effect followed by resolution / stretching <strong>and</strong><br />

color. Though these improvements in the scores cannot directly be converted to an improvement in acquisition range, the effects<br />

should be easily noticeable. Only a relatively small effect of color was found in this experiment because of the large distance (atmosphere<br />

effects), the limited color discrimination capability of the human eye for small objects, <strong>and</strong> the low color contrast of the<br />

targets (camouflage patterns). The color contrast stretching <strong>and</strong> the high resolution of the CCD cameras apparently are not enough<br />

to compensate for these effects. It is expected however, that color will have a much larger effect on performance for other tasks,<br />

such as visual search, <strong>and</strong> peace-keeping operations.<br />

Author<br />

Evaluation; CCD Cameras; Target Acquisition; Targets; Detection<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!