26.12.2012 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

expensive than a single analysis. It is therefore m<strong>and</strong>atory to find methods that evaluate aerodynamic functions <strong>and</strong> their gradient<br />

at the lowest possible computational cost, as well as fast <strong>and</strong> robust optimization methods. Classical optimization techniques<br />

(descent methods) not only require the value of the function to optimize, but also of its gradient. The classical way to compute<br />

the gradient is to use a finite-difference formula; the main drawback of this method is due to the fact that n + 1 evaluations of<br />

aerodynamic functions are necessary at each iteration, n being the number of parameters defining the geometry to optimize. So,<br />

such methods are completely un-suited to aerodynamic shape optimization, because of the high computational cost of the single<br />

analysis. Alternative methods (stochastic optimization, genetic algorithms) that don#t require gradient information are also highly<br />

costly in term of CPU time. For a few years, techniques for sensitivity analysis based on the optimal control theory have been<br />

developed. These techniques derive from the state equations another set of equations called ”adjoint” or ”costate” equations. The<br />

solution of these adjoint equations is used to compute the gradient at very low cost; since solving the adjoint equations is equivalent<br />

to solve the state equations, the cost of sensitivity analysis is greatly reduced. Some authors use adjoint equations derived from<br />

the discretized Euler equations. In this paper, we focus on adjoint equations derived from analytical state equations.<br />

Author<br />

Control Theory; Optimal Control; Two Dimensional Models; Aerodynamic Configurations; Viscous Flow; Shapes; Genetic Algorithms<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0063535 Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, CA USA<br />

Biomorphic Explorers Leading Towards a Robotic Ecology<br />

Thakoor, Sarita, Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., USA; Miralles, Carlos, AeroVironment, Inc., USA; Chao, Tien-<br />

Hsin, Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., USA; [1999]; 23p; In English; DARPA/ISAT Study Meeting: Towards a<br />

Robotic Ecology, 26-27 Apr. 1999, Cambridge, MA, USA; Sponsored by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, USA;<br />

No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

This paper presents viewgraphs of biomorphic explorers as they provide extended survival <strong>and</strong> useful life of robots in ecology.<br />

The topics include: 1) Biomorphic Explorers; 2) Advanced Mobility for Biomorphic Explorers; 3) Biomorphic Explorers: Size<br />

Based Classification; 4) Biomorphic Explorers: Classification (Based on Mobility <strong>and</strong> Ambient Environment); 5) Biomorphic<br />

Flight Systems: Vision; 6) Biomorphic Glider Deployment Concept: Larger Glider Deploy/Local Relay; 7) Biomorphic Glider<br />

Deployment Concept: Balloon Deploy/Dual Relay; 8) Biomorphic Exlplorer: Conceptual Design; 9) Biomorphic Gliders; <strong>and</strong><br />

10) Applications.<br />

CASI<br />

Ecology; Robotics; Biology<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0063536 Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, CA USA<br />

Biomorphic Explorers<br />

Thakoor, Sarita, Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., USA; [1999]; 19p; In English; Biologically Inspired Approaches<br />

for MAV’s, 21-22 Apr. 1999, Alex<strong>and</strong>ria, VA, USA; Sponsored by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, USA; No Copyright;<br />

Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

This paper presents, in viewgraph form, the first NASA/JPL workshop on Biomorphic Explorers for future missions. The<br />

topics include: 1) Biomorphic Explorers: Classification (Based on Mobility <strong>and</strong> Ambient Environment); 2) Biomorphic Flight<br />

Systems: Vision; 3) Biomorphic Explorer: Conceptual Design; 4) Biomorphic Gliders; 5) Summary <strong>and</strong> Roadmap; 6) Coordinated/Cooperative<br />

Exploration Scenario; <strong>and</strong> 7) Applications. This paper also presents illustrations of the various biomorphic<br />

explorers.<br />

CASI<br />

Biology; Animals; Classifications; Wildlife; Aerodynamics<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0064074 Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, CA USA<br />

Mars Rover Navigation Results Using Sun Sensor Heading Determination<br />

Volpe, Richard, Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., USA; [1998]; 8p; In English; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02,<br />

Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

Upcoming missions to the surface of Mars will use mobile robots to traverse long distances from the l<strong>and</strong>ing site. to prepare<br />

for these missions, the prototype rover, Rocky 7, has been tested in desert field trials conducted with a team of planetary scientists.<br />

While several new capabilities have been demonstrated, foremost among these was sun-sensor based traversal of natural terrain<br />

totaling a distance of one kilometer. This paper describes navigation results obtained in the field tests, where cross-track error was<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!