26.12.2012 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2000</strong>0064099 Teledyne Brown Engineering, Huntsville, AL USA<br />

ISS Payload Operations: The Need for <strong>and</strong> Benefit of Responsive Planning<br />

Nahay, Ed, Teledyne Brown Engineering, USA; Boster, M<strong>and</strong>ee, Teledyne Brown Engineering, USA; [<strong>2000</strong>]; 7p; In English;<br />

Space OPS <strong>2000</strong> Symposium, 19-23 Jun. <strong>2000</strong>, Toulouse, France<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAS8-50000; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

International Space Station (ISS) payload operations are controlled through implementation of a payload operations plan.<br />

This plan, which represents the defined approach to payload operations in general, can vary in terms of level of definition. The<br />

detailed plan provides the specific sequence <strong>and</strong> timing of each component of a payload’s operations. Such an approach to planning<br />

was implemented in the Spacelab program. The responsive plan provides a flexible approach to payload operations through<br />

generalization. A responsive approach to planning was implemented in the NASA/Mir Phase 1 program, <strong>and</strong> was identified as<br />

a need during the Skylab program. The current approach to ISS payload operations planning <strong>and</strong> control tends toward detailed<br />

planning, rather than responsive planning. The use of detailed plans provides for the efficient use of limited resources onboard<br />

the ISS. It restricts flexibility in payload operations, which is inconsistent with the dynamic nature of the ISS science program,<br />

<strong>and</strong> it restricts crew desires for flexibility <strong>and</strong> autonomy. Also, detailed planning is manpower intensive. The development <strong>and</strong><br />

implementation of a responsive plan provides for a more dynamic, more accommodating, <strong>and</strong> less manpower intensive approach<br />

to planning. The science program becomes more dynamic <strong>and</strong> responsive as the plan provides flexibility to accommodate realtime<br />

science accomplishments. Communications limitations <strong>and</strong> the crew desire for flexibility <strong>and</strong> autonomy in plan implementation<br />

are readily accommodated with responsive planning. Manpower efficiencies are accomplished through a reduction in<br />

requirements collection <strong>and</strong> coordination, plan development, <strong>and</strong> maintenance. Through examples <strong>and</strong> assessments, this paper<br />

identifies the need to transition from detailed to responsive plans for ISS payload operations. Examples depict specific characteristics<br />

of the plans. Assessments identify the following: the means by which responsive plans accommodate the dynamic nature of<br />

science programs <strong>and</strong> the crew desire for flexibility; the means by which responsive plans readily accommodate ISS communications<br />

constraints; manpower efficiencies to be achieved through use of responsive plans; <strong>and</strong> the implications of responsive planning<br />

relative to resource utilization efficiency.<br />

Author<br />

International Space Station; Skylab Program; Spacelab; Payload Control; Autonomy; Flexibility<br />

67<br />

THEORETICAL MATHEMATICS<br />

�������� �������� ���������� ��������� ��������� �������� ��� ������� ����� ������ ��� ��� ������ �������<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061916 Leiden Univ., Div. of Applied Mathematics, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

About the Sharpness of the Stability Estimates in the Kreiss Matrix Theorem<br />

Spijker, M. N.; Tracogna, S.; Welfert, B. D.; May 06, 1998; 30p; In English<br />

Report No.(s): PB<strong>2000</strong>-104879; TW-98-02; No Copyright; Avail: National <strong>Technical</strong> Information Service (NTIS)<br />

No abstract available.<br />

NTIS<br />

Matrices (Mathematics); Estimating; Theorems; Numerical Stability<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0064060 Joint Inst. for Nuclear Research, Lab. of Computing Techniques <strong>and</strong> Automation, Dubna, USSR<br />

Numerical solution of the nonstationary Schroedinger equation with increased accuracy<br />

Vinitskij, S. I.; Puzynin, I. V.; Selin, A.; Dec. 31, 1998; 19p; In Russian; In English<br />

Report No.(s): DE99-607985; JINR-R-11-98-44; No Copyright; Avail: Department of Energy Information Bridge<br />

The method of Crank-Nicolson difference scheme generalization based on Magnus expansion for evolution operator of nonstationary<br />

Schroedinger equation is proposed for increasing the time approximation accuracy. The stability of received schemes<br />

is shown. Comparison between numerical <strong>and</strong> analytical solutions of the model problem (variable frequency oscillator) has been<br />

done for scheme O ((tau)(sup 4)) to demonstrate the accuracy, efficiency <strong>and</strong> adequate convergence of the scheme.<br />

NTIS<br />

Schroedinger Equation; Accuracy<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!