26.12.2012 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

delivers 60% of the x-ray flux from the rotating anode system. Additional ways to improve our microfocus x-ray system, <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

increase the x-ray flux will be discussed.<br />

Author<br />

X Ray Diffraction; X Ray Sources; X Rays; Crystals; Proteins<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0067679 Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, CA USA<br />

Recent Trends in the Analysis of Quasioptical Systems<br />

Hoppe, D. J., Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., USA; Imbriale, W. A., Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech.,<br />

USA; [<strong>2000</strong>]; 1p; In English; No Copyright; Avail: Issuing Activity; Abstract Only<br />

The recent trend in microwave instruments is the use of multiple millimeter <strong>and</strong> submillimeter wavelength b<strong>and</strong>s. These systems<br />

are typically analyzed by using physical optics, Gaussian beams or ray tracing techniques. Physical optics offers high accuracy<br />

at the expense of computation time. This trade-off becomes particularly apparent in the analysis of multiple reflector<br />

antennas, such as beam waveguide antennas, where physical optics is used to compute the current on each reflector from the current<br />

on the previous reflector. At the other end of the spectrum is ray tracing approaches that ignore diffraction effects entirely.<br />

These methods are fast but sacrifice the ability to predict some effects accurately. An intermediate approach is to use an appropriate<br />

set of expansion functions to model the field between the reflectors. If the set is chosen wisely only a few coefficients need to be<br />

determined from each reflector current. The field is then computed at the next reflector through the use of the expansion functions<br />

<strong>and</strong> their coefficients rather than by using the previous reflector current. For a beam waveguide system with no enclosing tubes<br />

an excellent set of expansion functions is the Gaussian beam mode set. In many cases a preliminary design which includes the<br />

effects on diffraction may be obtained by considering only the fundamental mode <strong>and</strong> a thin lens model for the reflectors. Higherorder<br />

modes are included to model the effects of the curved reflector, which include asymmetric distortion of the beam, cross polarization,<br />

<strong>and</strong> beam truncation. This paper describes a computer code implementing higher-order Gaussian beam scattering by<br />

multiple reflector systems. There are four essential steps in the algorithm. (1) Compute the current on the first reflector using physical<br />

optics using either a feed model or by an incident set of Gaussian beam modes. (2) Find the direction of propagation for the<br />

reflected Gaussian beam-set using ray tracing. (3) Determine the waist size <strong>and</strong> location for the output beam set by examining<br />

the amplitude <strong>and</strong> phase distribution of the current on the reflector. (4) Compute the amplitudes of the individual modes in the<br />

output mode set. These steps are then repeated for each addition reflector in the chain. In each of these cases the previous Gaussian<br />

beam set provides the input field for the current calculation. Details of the four steps discussed above will be discussed. Examples<br />

will compare results from the Gaussian beam approach to pure physical optics, illustrating both its merits <strong>and</strong> limitations. Hybrid<br />

approaches capable of eliminating some of the limitations will also be discussed.<br />

Author<br />

Microwave Sensors; Submillimeter Waves; Beam Waveguides; Ray Tracing; Physical Optics<br />

75<br />

PLASMA PHYSICS<br />

�������� �������������������� ��� ������ ������� ��� ����������� ������� ��� �� ����������� ��� ����� ������� ��� �� ������<br />

��������<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0062453 Wisconsin Univ., Dept. of Physics, Madison, WI USA<br />

Dynamo <strong>and</strong> anomalous transport in the reversed field pinch<br />

Prager, S. C.; Aug. 31, 1998; 31p; In English; 25th; controlled fusion <strong>and</strong> plasma physics; Sponsored by European Physical Society,<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

Report No.(s): DE99-000800; No Copyright; Avail: Department of Energy Information Bridge<br />

The reversed field pinch is an effective tool to study the macroscopic consequences of magnetic fluctuations, such as the<br />

dynamo effect <strong>and</strong> anomalous transport. Several explanations exist for the dynamo (the self-generation of plasma current)--the<br />

MHD dynamo, the kinetic dynamo, <strong>and</strong> the diamagnetic dynamo. There is some experimental evidence for each, particularly from<br />

measurements of ion velocity <strong>and</strong> electron pressure fluctuations. Magnetic fluctuations are known to produce energy <strong>and</strong> particle<br />

flux in the RFP core. Current profile control is able to decrease fluctuation-induced transport by a factor of five. Improved confinement<br />

regimes are also obtained at deep reversal <strong>and</strong>, possibly, with flow shear.<br />

NTIS<br />

Plasma Physics; Reverse Field Pinch; Radiation Transport<br />

201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!