26.12.2012 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sonic <strong>and</strong> transonic cases will be presented. Flexibility in the use of the design variables allows many different tests to be performed<br />

before the best solution is achieved. Lastly, the computational cost is reduced by the use of a low level code for computing the<br />

aerodynamic coefficients.<br />

Author<br />

Wings; Design Analysis; Optimization; Subsonic Flow; Transonic Flow<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061439 Italian <strong>Aerospace</strong> Research Center, Capua, Italy<br />

A Multiobjective Approach to Transonic Wing Design by Means of Genetic Algorithms<br />

Vicini, A., Italian <strong>Aerospace</strong> Research Center, Italy; Quagliarella, D., Italian <strong>Aerospace</strong> Research Center, Italy; Aerodynamic<br />

Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary Environment; June <strong>2000</strong>, pp. 22-1 - 22-12; In<br />

English; See also <strong>2000</strong>0061419; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

In this work a transonic wing design problem is faced by means of a multiobjective genetic algorithm, <strong>and</strong> using a full potential<br />

flow model. The applications here presented regard both planform <strong>and</strong> wing section optimization. It is shown how both geometric<br />

<strong>and</strong> aerodynamic constraints can be taken into account, <strong>and</strong> how the multiobjective approach to optimization can be an effective<br />

way to h<strong>and</strong>le conflicting design criteria. An interpolation technique allowing a better approximation of Pareto fronts is described.<br />

Two possible ways of improving the computational efficiency of the genetic algorithm, namely a parallel implementation of the<br />

code <strong>and</strong> a hybrid optimization approach, are presented.<br />

Author<br />

Aircraft Design; Wings; Design Analysis; Transonic Flow; Genetic Algorithms<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061440 National Research Council of Canada, Aerodynamics Lab., Ottawa, Ontario Canada<br />

Application of Micro Genetic Algorithms <strong>and</strong> Neural Networks for Airfoil Design Optimization<br />

Tse, Daniel C. M., National Research Council of Canada, Canada; Chan, Louis Y. Y., National Research Council of Canada, Canada;<br />

Aerodynamic Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary Environment; June <strong>2000</strong>, pp.<br />

23-1 - 23-11; In English; See also <strong>2000</strong>0061419; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Genetic algorithms are versatile optimization tools suitable for solving multi-disciplinary optimization problems in aerodynamics<br />

where the design parameters may exhibit multi-modal or non-smooth variations. However, the fitness evaluation phase<br />

of the algorithms casts a large overhead on the computational requirement <strong>and</strong> is particularly acute in aerodynamic problems<br />

where time-consuming CFD methods are needed for evaluating performance. Methods <strong>and</strong> strategies to improve the performance<br />

of basic genetic algorithms are important to enable the method to be useful for complicated three-dimensional or multi-disciplinary<br />

problems. Two such methods are studied in the present work: micro genetic algorithms <strong>and</strong> artificial neural networks. Both<br />

methods are applied to inverse <strong>and</strong> direct airfoil design problems <strong>and</strong> the resulting improvement in efficiency is noted <strong>and</strong> discussed.<br />

Author<br />

Genetic Algorithms; Neural Nets; Airfoils; Design Analysis; Optimization<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061441 Daimler-Benz <strong>Aerospace</strong> A.G., Munich, Germany<br />

Multi-Objective Aeroelastic Optimization<br />

Stettner, M., Daimler-Benz <strong>Aerospace</strong> A.G., Germany; Haase, W., Daimler-Benz <strong>Aerospace</strong> A.G., Germany; Aerodynamic<br />

Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary Environment; June <strong>2000</strong>, pp. 24-1 - 24-8; In<br />

English; See also <strong>2000</strong>0061419<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): ESPRDIT Proj. 20082; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

The present work is aiming at an aeroelastic analysis of the X31 delta wing <strong>and</strong> particularly at the aeroelastic optimization<br />

problem of maximizing the aerodynamic roll rate <strong>and</strong> minimizing the structural weight at supersonic flow speeds. Results are<br />

achieved by means of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) utilizing a GUI-supported software being developed in the European-Union<br />

funded ESPRIT project FRONTIER.<br />

Author<br />

Aeroelasticity; Optimization; Delta Wings; Genetic Algorithms<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!