26.12.2012 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82<br />

DOCUMENTATION AND INFORMATION SCIENCE<br />

�������� ����������� ����������� ����������� ������� ��� ��������� ����������� ��������� �������� ������� ����� ��� ������������ ���<br />

�������� ������������� ��� �� �������� ����������� ��� ���������<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061448 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA USA<br />

Development of X-33/X-34 Aerothermodynamic Data Bases: Lessons Learned <strong>and</strong> Future Enhancements<br />

Miller, C. G., NASA Langley Research Center, USA; Aerodynamic Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent<br />

Multi-Disciplinary Environment; June <strong>2000</strong>, pp. 32-1 - 32-12; In English; See also <strong>2000</strong>0061419; Copyright Waived; Avail:<br />

CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

A synoptic of programmatic <strong>and</strong> technical lessons learned in the development of aerothermodynamic data bases for the X-33<br />

<strong>and</strong> X-34 programs is presented in general terms <strong>and</strong> from the perspective of the NASA Langley Research Center Aerothermodynamics<br />

Branch. The format used is that of the ”aerothermodynamic chain,” the links of which are personnel, facilities, models/test<br />

articles, instrumentation, test techniques, <strong>and</strong> computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Because the aerodynamic data bases upon<br />

which the X-33 <strong>and</strong> X-34 vehicles will fly are almost exclusively from wind tunnel testing, as opposed to CFD, the primary focus<br />

of the lessons learned is on ground-based testing. The period corresponding to the development of X-33 <strong>and</strong> X-34 aerothermodynamic<br />

data bases was challenging, since a number of other such programs (e.g., X-<strong>38</strong>, X-43) competed for resources at a time of<br />

downsizing of personnel, facilities, etc., outsourcing, <strong>and</strong> role changes as NASA Centers served as subcontractors to industry. The<br />

impact of this changing environment is embedded in the lessons learned. From a technical perspective, the relatively long times<br />

to design <strong>and</strong> fabricate metallic force <strong>and</strong> moment models, delays in delivery of models, <strong>and</strong> a lack of quality assurance to determine<br />

the fidelity of model outer mold lines (OML) prior to wind tunnel testing had a major negative impact on the programs. On<br />

the positive side, the application of phosphor thermography to obtain global, quantitative heating distributions on rapidly fabricated<br />

ceramic models revolutionized the aerothermodynamic optimization of vehicle OMLs, control surfaces, etc. Vehicle designers<br />

were provided with aeroheating information prior to, or in conjunction with, aerodynamic information early in the program,<br />

thereby allowing trades to be made with both sets of input; in the past only aerodynamic data were available as input. Programmatically,<br />

failure to include transonic aerodynamic wind tunnel tests early in the assessment phase led to delays in the optimization<br />

phase, as OMLs required modification to provide adequate transonic aerodynamic performance without sacrificing subsonic <strong>and</strong><br />

hypersonic performance. Funding schedules for industry, based on technical milestones, also presented challenges to aerothermodynamics<br />

seeking optimum flying characteristics across the subsonic to hypersonic speed regimes <strong>and</strong> minimum aeroheating.<br />

This paper is concluded with a brief discussion of enhancements in ground-based testing/CFD capabilities necessary to partially/<br />

fully satisfy future requirements.<br />

Author<br />

Aerodynamic Characteristics; Aerothermodynamics; Data Bases; Fabrication; Ground Tests; X-33 Reusable Launch Vehicle;<br />

X-34 Reusable Launch Vehicle; X-<strong>38</strong> Crew Return Vehicle<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061485 Center for Army Analysis, Fort Belvoir, VA USA<br />

Third Special Conference on Historical Data Analysis (SCOHDA 3) Final Report, Feb. - Mar. <strong>2000</strong><br />

Gory, Duane; Mar. <strong>2000</strong>; 35p; In English; 3rd, 2-3 Mar. <strong>2000</strong>, Fort Belvoir, VA, USA<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A377305; CAA-R-00-12; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

The Center for Army Analysis hosted the Third Special Conference on Historical Data Analysis (SCOHDA III) from 2-3<br />

March <strong>2000</strong>. The purpose of the conference was to provide an exchange between the armies of the USA, UK, Australia, <strong>and</strong> France<br />

on techniques for examining <strong>and</strong> uses of data on historical combat operations to support defense planning <strong>and</strong> analysis.<br />

DTIC<br />

Conferences; Histories; Defense Program; Data Processing<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0062302 Information International Associates, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN USA<br />

CENDI Metadata Initiatives: Beyond the Bibliographic Record<br />

Hodge, Gail; Apr. 1998; 23p; In English<br />

Report No.(s): AD-A377496; CENDI-1998-3; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy; A01, Microfiche<br />

No Abstract Available.<br />

DTIC<br />

Information Retrieval; Information Transfer; Information Theory; Information Systems<br />

215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!