26.12.2012 Views

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports Volume 38 July 28, 2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This paper addresses the problem to define a methodology for the analysis of the performances of different aircraft configurations<br />

in the phase of conceptual design. The proposed approach is based on a numerical optimisation procedure where a scalar<br />

objective function, the take-off weight, is minimized. The optimisation algorithm has obviously important consequences both<br />

from the point of view of the computational times <strong>and</strong> of the obtained results. For this reason a preliminary discussion is made<br />

where various different methodologies are critically compared. Although the best compromise between different approaches is<br />

probably given by an integration between a genetic algorithm approach <strong>and</strong> a classical gradient method, in this phase only the<br />

latter procedure has been used to pe$orm the simulations. The methodology takes into account the high number of geometrical<br />

parameters <strong>and</strong> the flight mechanics requirements involved in the problem. A basic example is described, <strong>and</strong> the use of the proposed<br />

methodology to investigate the effects of different geometrical <strong>and</strong> technological parameters is discussed.<br />

Author<br />

Aerodynamic Configurations; Aircraft Configurations; Measure <strong>and</strong> Integration; Optimization<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061426 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA USA<br />

Aero-Mechanical Design Methodology for Subsonic Civil Transport High-Lift Systems<br />

vanDam, C. P., California Univ., USA; Shaw, S. G., California Univ., USA; V<strong>and</strong>erKam, J. C., California Univ., USA; Brodeur,<br />

R. R., California Univ., USA; Rudolph, P. K. C., PKCR, Inc., USA; Kinney, D., NASA Ames Research Center, USA; Aerodynamic<br />

Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary Environment; June <strong>2000</strong>, pp. 7-1 - 7-12;<br />

In English; See also <strong>2000</strong>0061419<br />

Contract(s)/Grant(s): NCC2-5188; NCC2-5255; SNL-A0273; A46374D(LAS); A49736D(SLS); Copyright Waived; Avail:<br />

CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

In today’s highly competitive <strong>and</strong> economically driven commercial aviation market, the trend is to make aircraft systems simpler<br />

<strong>and</strong> to shorten their design cycle which reduces recurring, non-recurring <strong>and</strong> operating costs. One such system is the high-lift<br />

system. A methodology has been developed which merges aerodynamic data with kinematic analysis of the trailing-edge flap<br />

mechanism with minimum mechanism definition required. This methodology provides quick <strong>and</strong> accurate aerodynamic performance<br />

prediction for a given flap deployment mechanism early on in the high-lift system preliminary design stage. Sample analysis<br />

results for four different deployment mechanisms are presented as well as descriptions of the aerodynamic <strong>and</strong> mechanism<br />

data required for evaluation. Extensions to interactive design capabilities are also discussed.<br />

Author<br />

Procedures; Design Analysis; Subsonic Speed; Operating Costs; Kinematics; Commercial Aircraft; Aerodynamic Characteristics<br />

<strong>2000</strong>0061427 Defence Evaluation Research Agency, Farnborough, UK<br />

Conceptual Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Modern Combat Aircraft<br />

Crawford, C. A., Defence Evaluation Research Agency, UK; Simm, S. E., Defence Evaluation Research Agency, UK; Aerodynamic<br />

Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary Environment; June <strong>2000</strong>, pp. 8-1 - 8-11;<br />

In English; See also <strong>2000</strong>0061419; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

The design of a combat aircraft is an extremely complex task, due to the large range of design variables available. A fundamental<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the effects of changes to these variables, <strong>and</strong> to changes in design/performance requirements, is necessary<br />

to achieve a balanced design. At the Defence Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Research Agency (DERA) this is achieved with the help of conceptual<br />

design <strong>and</strong> optimisation programs, developed <strong>and</strong> used extensively over the past 20 years or so. These Multi-Variate Optimisation<br />

(MVO) programs are rapid assessment tools, enabling the effects of variations in design variables <strong>and</strong> performance requirements,<br />

in terms of overall aircraft sizing <strong>and</strong> geometric shape. to be quickly demonstrated. The programs are used routinely within the<br />

Air Vehicle Performance Group at DERA to conduct trade-off studies. These include assessments of the benefits of new technologies<br />

(e.g. in the fields of structures, aerodynamics or engines) <strong>and</strong> the impact of setting various levels of performance requirement.<br />

The results provide information <strong>and</strong> advice to the military customer, aiding balance of investment decisions <strong>and</strong> helping with initial<br />

concept definition.<br />

Author<br />

Design Analysis; Aircraft Design; Fighter Aircraft<br />

<strong>2000</strong>00614<strong>28</strong> Dassault Aviation, Saint-Cloud, France<br />

Multi-Disciplinary Constraints in Aerodynamic Design<br />

Perrier, P., Dassault Aviation, France; Aerodynamic Design <strong>and</strong> Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi-Disciplinary<br />

Environment; June <strong>2000</strong>, pp. 10-1 - 10-12; In English; See also <strong>2000</strong>0061419; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!