glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sacred Scripture: A sacred Scripture . . . is a totality, a diversified image <strong>of</strong> Being,<br />
diversified and transfigured for the sake <strong>of</strong> the human receptacle; it is a light that wills to<br />
make itself visible to clay, or wills to take the form <strong>of</strong> that clay; or still in other words, it<br />
is a truth which, since it must address itself to beings compounded <strong>of</strong> clay, has no means<br />
<strong>of</strong> expression other than the very substance <strong>of</strong> the nescience <strong>of</strong> which our soul is made.<br />
[UI, The Quran]<br />
Sacred Thought / Pr<strong>of</strong>ane Thought (difference between): There is an essential<br />
distinction to be made here: there are errors that lie within the framework <strong>of</strong> integral and<br />
decisive truth, and there are errors that break this framework, and therein lies the whole<br />
difference between sacred and pr<strong>of</strong>ane thought. It is sometimes said that no doctrine is<br />
entirely wrong and that there is truth in everything, but this is altogether false, because,<br />
while fundamental – and thus decisive – truths can neutralize any minor errors in a<br />
doctrine, minor truths are valueless within the framework <strong>of</strong> a major error; this is why<br />
one must never glorify an error for having taught us some truth or other, nor look for<br />
truth in errors on the pretext that truth is everywhere the same – for there are important<br />
nuances here – and above all one must not reject a fundamental and comprehensive truth<br />
because <strong>of</strong> a minor error that may happen to accompany it.<br />
Be that as it may, the human soul is capable, paradoxically and up to a certain point, <strong>of</strong><br />
combining spiritual knowledge with a singular incapacity to express it in accordance with<br />
the total context and the logic <strong>of</strong> things. There is, after all, no common measure between<br />
the inner man attracted <strong>by</strong> the emanations <strong>of</strong> the Infinite, and the outer man living on<br />
preconceptions and habits and sometimes allowing his thought to move on a level<br />
proportionally far below his intelligence. It is <strong>of</strong> course desirable for man to match his<br />
thought to his real knowledge without letting any purely formal inconsistencies persist,<br />
but this is a particular grace. [CI, Dilemmas <strong>of</strong> Moslem Scholasticism]<br />
Saint: A saint is a void open for the passage <strong>of</strong> God. [SW, Complexity <strong>of</strong> the Concept <strong>of</strong><br />
Charity]<br />
The saint is the man who acts as if he had died and returned to life; having already ceased<br />
to be ‘himself’, in the earthly sense, he has absolutely no intention <strong>of</strong> returning to that<br />
dream, but maintains himself in a kind <strong>of</strong> wakefulness that the world, with its narrowness<br />
and impurities, cannot understand. [GDW, The Christian Tradition, Some Thoughts on its<br />
Nature]<br />
Salvation / Morality: Salvation consists in leaving the infernal circle <strong>of</strong> “concordant<br />
actions and reactions”; and in this connection, morality appears as a quite provisional and<br />
fragmentary thing, and even as inoperative in the sight <strong>of</strong> the Absolute, since it is still<br />
involved in the indefinite chain <strong>of</strong> acts and the existential fruit <strong>of</strong> acts. [TB, Originality <strong>of</strong><br />
Buddhism]<br />
Sanatana Dharma: The “Eternal (or Primordial) Law”. [TUR, Limits <strong>of</strong><br />
Religious Expansion]<br />
127