glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Intentionism / Sincerism: Intentionism and sincerism go hand-in-hand; what the first<br />
has in common with the second is that it flies to defend all things blameworthy, whether<br />
extravagant and pernicious or simply mediocre and vulgar; in short, to be “sincere,” is to<br />
show oneself “as one is,” unconditionally and cynically, hence counter to any effort to be<br />
what one ought to be. It is forgotten that the worth <strong>of</strong> sincerity lies in its contents only,<br />
and that it is charity to avoid giving a bad example; the individual owes society a correct<br />
comportment, to say the least, which has nothing to do with the vice <strong>of</strong> dissimulation. Let<br />
us specify that correct comportment, such as is required <strong>by</strong> good sense and traditional<br />
morality, has as a necessary corollary a certain effacement, whereas hypocrisy <strong>by</strong><br />
definition is a kind <strong>of</strong> exhibitionism, crude or subtle as the case may be. [PM, On<br />
Intention]<br />
Inwardness: The fact that the subject amounts to a dimension <strong>of</strong> the object, rather as<br />
time is in a sense a dimension <strong>of</strong> space – this fact shows how important the perspective <strong>of</strong><br />
“inwardness” is in the face <strong>of</strong> God; that is, the accentuation <strong>of</strong> inward, intrinsic, pr<strong>of</strong>ound<br />
qualities, and <strong>by</strong> way <strong>of</strong> consequence the concern to avoid the pitfall <strong>of</strong> superficial<br />
formalism. Christ intended that one adore God “in spirit and in truth,” and not <strong>by</strong> “the<br />
prescriptions <strong>of</strong> men”; he opposed inward, and <strong>by</strong> definition sincere, values to outward<br />
and extrinsic attitudes; and this, if it is not esoterism pure and simple, is at least one <strong>of</strong> its<br />
fundamental dimensions. “The kingdom <strong>of</strong> God is within you”; this refers metaphysically<br />
to the divine “Self,” to the immanent Atma; hence to the “uncreated and uncreatable”<br />
Intellect <strong>of</strong> the Eckhartian doctrine.<br />
“The world is false, Brahman is true; the soul is not other than Brahman.” This Vedantic<br />
formula furnishes the key <strong>of</strong> the principle <strong>of</strong> inwardness: which means that we can attain<br />
the divine Self only within ourselves, given that it is our essence. Moreover, it is this<br />
mystery <strong>of</strong> potential or virtual identity that explains the secretiveness <strong>of</strong> esoterism.<br />
In a more elementary mode, inwardness is faith, which <strong>by</strong> its very nature frees from<br />
formalistic and legalistic servitude, and which essentially saves us; however, more<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>oundly, inwardness is union with the immanent divine Presence and, in the final<br />
analysis, with the divine Self. This dimension <strong>of</strong> depth does not, <strong>of</strong> course, abolish faith,<br />
but on the contrary includes and “essentializes” it; if faith can save us, that is because it<br />
is, at the level it pertains to, a mode <strong>of</strong> our paradisiacal essence. [RHC, Pillars <strong>of</strong><br />
Wisdom]<br />
Inwardness / Outwardness: The quality <strong>of</strong> inwardness demands <strong>of</strong> us not a renunciation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the outward world – which, besides, would be impossible – but an equilibrium<br />
determined <strong>by</strong> the spiritual meaning <strong>of</strong> the world and <strong>of</strong> life. The vice <strong>of</strong> outwardness is<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> harmony between the two dimensions: between our tendency towards the<br />
things that surround us and our tendency towards the “kingdom <strong>of</strong> God which is within<br />
you.” What is necessary is to realize a spiritual rootedness that removes from<br />
outwardness its tyranny at once dispersing and compressing, and that on the contrary<br />
allows us to “see God everywhere”; which means to perceive symbols, archetypes and<br />
essences in sensible things, for the beauties perceived <strong>by</strong> an interiorized soul become<br />
factors <strong>of</strong> interiorization. Similarly regarding matter: what is necessary is not to deny it –<br />
if that were possible – but to withdraw from its seductive and enslaving grasp; to<br />
73