glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
total since this form is a symbol and is therefore something <strong>of</strong> what it has to<br />
communicate. [SW, Orthodoxy and Intellectuality]<br />
Doctrine (exoteric / esoteric): A doctrine or a Path is exoteric to the degree that it is<br />
obliged to take account <strong>of</strong> individualism – which is the fruit not so much <strong>of</strong> passion itself<br />
as <strong>of</strong> the hold exerted <strong>by</strong> passion upon thought – and to veil the equation <strong>of</strong> Intellect and<br />
Self under a mythological and moral imagery, irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether a historical element<br />
is combined with that imagery or not; and a doctrine is esoteric to the degree that it<br />
communicates the very essence <strong>of</strong> our universal position, our situation between<br />
nothingness and Infinity. Esoterism is concerned with the nature <strong>of</strong> things and not merely<br />
with our human eschatology; it views the Universe not from the human standpoint but<br />
from the “standpoint” <strong>of</strong> God. [LS, Gnosis, Language <strong>of</strong> the Self]<br />
Doctrine (limitation): A doctrinal limitation does not always denote a corresponding<br />
intellectual limitation since it can be situated on the level <strong>of</strong> mental articulation and not<br />
on that <strong>of</strong> pure intellection. [FSR, Paradoxes <strong>of</strong> Spiritual Expression]<br />
Doctrine (quintessence): When one speaks <strong>of</strong> doctrinal “quintessence,” this may mean<br />
one <strong>of</strong> two things: firstly, the l<strong>of</strong>tiest and subtlest part <strong>of</strong> a doctrine, and it is in this sense<br />
that Sufis distinguish between the “husk” (qishr) and the “marrow” (lubb); and secondly,<br />
an integral doctrine envisaged in respect <strong>of</strong> its fundamental and necessary nature, and<br />
thus leaving aside all outward trappings and all superstructure. [SVQ, Preface]<br />
Doctrine (truth): It is sometimes said that no doctrine is entirely wrong and that there is<br />
truth in everything; but this is altogether false, because, while fundamental – and thus<br />
decisive – truths can neutralize any minor errors in a doctrine, minor truths are valueless<br />
within the framework <strong>of</strong> a major error; this is why one must never glorify an error for<br />
having taught us some truth or other, nor look for truth in errors on the pretext that truth<br />
is everywhere the same – for there are important nuances here – and above all one must<br />
not reject a fundamental and comprehensive truth because <strong>of</strong> a minor error that may<br />
happen to accompany it. [CI, Dilemmas <strong>of</strong> Moslem Scholasticism]<br />
Dogmatism: Dogmatism is characterized <strong>by</strong> the fact that it attributes an absolute scope<br />
and an exclusive sense to a particular point <strong>of</strong> view or aspect. [UI, Islam]<br />
Dogmatism as such does not consist in the mere enunciation <strong>of</strong> an idea, that is to say, in<br />
the fact <strong>of</strong> giving form to a spiritual intuition, but rather in an interpretation that, instead<br />
<strong>of</strong> rejoining the formless and total Truth after taking as its starting point one <strong>of</strong> the forms<br />
<strong>of</strong> that Truth, results in a sort <strong>of</strong> paralysis <strong>of</strong> this form <strong>by</strong> denying its intellectual<br />
potentialities and <strong>by</strong> attributing to it an absoluteness that only the formless and total Truth<br />
itself can possess. [TUR, Conceptual Dimensions]<br />
Dogmatism / Empiricism: A few words must be said here on the antinomy between<br />
dogmatism and empiricism: the empiricist error consists not in the belief that experiment<br />
has a certain utility, which is obvious, but in thinking that there is a common measure<br />
between principial knowledge and experiment, and in attributing to the latter an absolute<br />
value, whereas in fact it can only have a bearing on modes, never on the very principles<br />
29