glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Theology is a type <strong>of</strong> thought which, being founded on the necessarily antinomic and<br />
elliptical – but <strong>by</strong> no means contradictory or insoluble – data <strong>of</strong> the sacred Scriptures,<br />
interprets these data <strong>by</strong> means <strong>of</strong> reason and in accordance with a piety <strong>of</strong>ten more<br />
fervent than enlightened. This results in theories which are doubtless opportune and<br />
efficacious in a given psychological or moral connection, but which are restrictive or<br />
even unsound from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> pure and simple truth, and in any case<br />
unacceptable on the plane <strong>of</strong> metaphysics. [CI, Dilemmas <strong>of</strong> Moslem Scholasticism]<br />
Theory / Reality: A doctrinal theory can merely <strong>of</strong>fer points <strong>of</strong> reference, if only for the<br />
simple reason that an expression is necessarily something other than the reality to be<br />
expressed. The identity between theory and reality is moreover as unnecessary as it is<br />
impossible, precisely because a theory is able to furnish perfectly sufficient points <strong>of</strong><br />
reference, otherwise there would be no adequate and effectual symbolism, nor<br />
consequently any doctrine; it is this which most pr<strong>of</strong>ane thinkers are incapable <strong>of</strong><br />
understanding, they who wish to exhaust everything in words, and who imagine that one<br />
knows only what one expresses. [CI, Atomism and Creation]<br />
Thought: By “thought” we mean here, not an artificial elaboration but the mental<br />
crystallization <strong>of</strong> real knowledge. With all due deference to anti-Platonic theologians,<br />
Platonism is not true because it is logical, it is logical because it is true; and as for the<br />
possible or apparent illogicalities <strong>of</strong> the theologians, these can be explained not <strong>by</strong> an<br />
alleged right to the mysteries <strong>of</strong> absurdity, but <strong>by</strong> the fragmentary character <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
dogmatic positions and also <strong>by</strong> the insufficiency <strong>of</strong> the means <strong>of</strong> thought and expression.<br />
We may recall in this connection the alternativism and the sublimism proper to the<br />
Semitic mentality, as well as the absence <strong>of</strong> the crucial notion <strong>of</strong> Maya – at least at the<br />
ordinary theological level, meaning <strong>by</strong> this reservation that the boundaries <strong>of</strong> theology<br />
are not strictly delimited. [EPW, The Primordial Tree]<br />
Thought (exoteric): Theological or, to be more precise, exoteric thought – the two things<br />
do not always coincide exactly – generally shows itself incapable <strong>of</strong> grasping<br />
simultaneously two divergent aspects <strong>of</strong> one and the same reality: it works <strong>by</strong> alternatives<br />
which tend to be moralizing, the more “pious” option being the “truer” one in its eyes, the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> piety being determined <strong>by</strong> the perspective which is characteristic <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Revelation in question, even though this Revelation may not necessarily imply the same<br />
option on the plane <strong>of</strong> the pure truth. It is not Christ who is anti-Platonic, it is Christians<br />
who are, to the extent that they are: however traditional the anathema pronounced in<br />
certain liturgical practices <strong>of</strong> the Greek Church against the Platonists may be, it<br />
nonetheless clearly derives from what we may call the “human margin.” Theologically,<br />
the falsity <strong>of</strong> the Platonic thesis can only amount to a hypothesis, and one which is all the<br />
more senseless in that no theologian can contest that the principles <strong>of</strong> things necessarily<br />
preexist in the creative Intellect, or Providence, if one so prefers, and that each positive<br />
cosmic possibility is presided over <strong>by</strong> an angelic power which is its prototype or “idea.”<br />
[LT, Rationalism, Real and Apparent]<br />
Thought (pr<strong>of</strong>ane): Pr<strong>of</strong>ane thought is not confined to thought which is ignorant <strong>of</strong><br />
metaphysical and mystical truths, but also includes thought which, while knowing these<br />
146