glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Intelligent Error: It is only too evident that mental effort does not automatically give<br />
rise to the perception <strong>of</strong> the real; the most capable mind may be the vehicle <strong>of</strong> the<br />
grossest error. The paradoxical phenomenon <strong>of</strong> even a “brilliant” intelligence being the<br />
vehicle <strong>of</strong> error is explained first <strong>of</strong> all <strong>by</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> a mental operation that is<br />
exclusively “horizontal,” hence lacking all awareness <strong>of</strong> “vertical” relationships;<br />
however, the definition “intelligence” still applies, because there is still a discernment<br />
between something essential and something secondary, or between a cause and an effect.<br />
A decisive factor in the phenomenon <strong>of</strong> “intelligent error” is plainly the intervention <strong>of</strong> an<br />
extra-intellectual element, such as sentimentality or passion; the exclusivism <strong>of</strong><br />
“horizontality” creates a void that the irrational necessarily comes to fill. It should be<br />
noted that “horizontality” is not always the negation <strong>of</strong> the supernatural; it may also be<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> a believer whose intellectual intuition remains latent, this being precisely what<br />
constitutes the “obscure merit <strong>of</strong> faith”; in such a case one may, without absurdity, speak<br />
<strong>of</strong> devotional and moral “verticality.” [RHC, On Intelligence]<br />
Intention: The primacy <strong>of</strong> intention stems from the fact that one and the same action –<br />
we are not saying every action – may be good or bad according to the intention, whereas<br />
the inverse is not true: an intention is not good or bad according to the action. It is not<br />
actions that matter primarily, but rather intentions, as common sense as well as traditional<br />
wisdom tell us; however, it goes without saying that this could not mean, as some people<br />
imagine, that every imperfect or even bad action can be exc<strong>used</strong> <strong>by</strong> supposing that the<br />
intention was good or even <strong>by</strong> arguing that every intention is basically good merely<br />
because it is subjective and that, according to some people, subjectivity is always right . .<br />
. and also that subjectivity has priority over objective reality; whereas “there is no right<br />
superior to that <strong>of</strong> the truth.” [PM, On Intention]<br />
The fixed idea that the argument <strong>of</strong> intention is a panacea has become so habitual that too<br />
many people abuse it without reflecting, <strong>by</strong> protesting their good intention in cases where<br />
the question <strong>of</strong> intention could not even arise. Quite generally, it is all too clear that good<br />
intentions in no way constitute a guarantee <strong>of</strong> a man’s worth, nor even, consequently, <strong>of</strong><br />
his salvation; in this sense, intention is worthy only through its actualization.*<br />
(*As the German – or the analogous English – proverb has it: “The road to hell is paved<br />
with good intentions” (Der Weg zur Holle ist mit guten Vorsatzen gepflastert); doubtless<br />
they derive from this saying <strong>of</strong> Ecclesiasticus (21:10): “The way <strong>of</strong> sinners is smoothly<br />
paved with stones, but at its end is the pit <strong>of</strong> Hades.” And according to the Epistle <strong>of</strong><br />
Saint James (4:17), “To him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.”)<br />
[PM, On Intention]<br />
Intention determines not only actions, but obviously also moral attitudes. There is a<br />
humility, a charity and a sincerity – but these are then merely appearances – stemming<br />
from hypocrisy, hence properly from satanism, namely: egalitarian and demagogic<br />
humility, humanistic and basically bitter charity, and cynical sincerity. There are false<br />
virtues whose motives are basically to demonstrate to oneself that one has no need <strong>of</strong><br />
God; the sin <strong>of</strong> pride consists here in believing that our virtues are our property and not a<br />
gift <strong>of</strong> Heaven; which is all the more wrong in that, in this case, the virtues are imaginary,<br />
since pride perverts them. [PM, On Intention]<br />
72