glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
an immutable essence in which creatures may either participate or not participate, and<br />
that a given experience <strong>of</strong> liberty is only an “accident.” Defined in positive <strong>terms</strong> liberty<br />
is the possibility <strong>of</strong> manifesting oneself fully, or being perfectly oneself, and this<br />
possibility (or this experience) runs through the universe as a real, and hence concrete,<br />
beatitude in which animate beings participate according to their natures and their<br />
destinies; the animate Universe is a being that breathes, and that lives both in itself and in<br />
its innumerable individualized constituents; and behind all this there subsists the ineffable<br />
liberty <strong>of</strong> the Infinite . . . When a bird escapes from its cage we say that it is free; we<br />
might just as truly say that liberty has erupted at a particular point on the cosmic shell, or<br />
that it has taken possession <strong>of</strong> the bird, or that it has manifested itself through this<br />
creature or that form; liberation is something that occurs, but liberty is that which is,<br />
which always has been and always will be. The prototype <strong>of</strong> all liberty, and the reality<br />
expressed in every particular or “accidental” phenomenon <strong>of</strong> liberty, is the limitlessness<br />
<strong>of</strong> principial or Divine activity, or the consciousness God has <strong>of</strong> his All-Possibility. [LT,<br />
Abuse <strong>of</strong> the Ideas <strong>of</strong> the Concrete and the Abstract]<br />
Logic: It is not for nothing that “logic” (logikos) comes from “Logos,” which derivation<br />
indicates, in a symbolical fashion at least, that logic – the mental reflection <strong>of</strong> ontology –<br />
cannot, in its substance, be bound up with human arbitrariness; that, on the contrary, it is<br />
a quasi-pneumatological phenomenon in the sense that it results from the Divine Nature<br />
itself, in a manner analogous – if not to the same degree – to that <strong>of</strong> intellectual intuition .<br />
. . Let us admit that human logic is at times inoperative; however, it is not inoperative<br />
because it is logical, but because it is human; because, being human, it is subject to<br />
psychological and material contingencies which prevent it from being what it is <strong>by</strong> itself,<br />
and what it is <strong>by</strong> its origin and in its source, wherein it coincides with the being <strong>of</strong> things.<br />
As is proved <strong>by</strong> the practice <strong>of</strong> meditation, intuition can arise through the workings <strong>of</strong> a<br />
rational operation – provisional and not decisive – which then acts as a key or as an<br />
occasional cause; on condition, <strong>of</strong> course, that the intelligence has at its disposal correct<br />
and sufficient data, and that it benefits from the concurrence <strong>of</strong> a moral health founded<br />
upon the sense <strong>of</strong> the sacred, and consequently capable <strong>of</strong> a sense <strong>of</strong> proportions as well<br />
as <strong>of</strong> aesthetic intuition. For all things are linked together: if the intelligence directly has<br />
need <strong>of</strong> rigor, it also indirectly has need <strong>of</strong> beauty. [FDH, Transcendence Is Not Contrary<br />
to Sense]<br />
It is not possible to emphasize too strongly that philosophy, in its humanistic and<br />
rationalizing and therefore current sense, consists primarily <strong>of</strong> logic; this definition <strong>of</strong><br />
Guénon’s correctly situates philosophical thought in making clear its distinction from<br />
“intellectual intuition,” which is direct perception <strong>of</strong> truth. But another distinction must<br />
also be established on the rational plane itself: logic can either operate in accordance with<br />
an intellection or on the contrary put itself at the disposal <strong>of</strong> an error, so that philosophy<br />
can become the vehicle <strong>of</strong> just about anything; it may be an Aristotelianism conveying<br />
ontological knowledge, just as it may degenerate into an existentialism in which logic is<br />
no more than a blind, unreal activity, and which can rightly be described as an “esoterism<br />
<strong>of</strong> stupidity.” When unintelligence – and what we mean <strong>by</strong> this is in no way incompatible<br />
with “worldly” intelligence – joins with passion to prostitute logic, it is impossible to<br />
escape a mental Satanism which destroys the very basis <strong>of</strong> intelligence and truth.<br />
78