glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and its ultimate effects cannot but be deadly. In other words, modern science is a<br />
totalitarian rationalism that eliminates both Revelation and Intellect, and at the same time<br />
a totalitarian materialism that ignores the metaphysical relativity – and therewith also the<br />
impermanence – <strong>of</strong> matter and <strong>of</strong> the world. It does not know that the supra-sensible,<br />
situated as it is beyond space and time, is the concrete principle <strong>of</strong> the world, and that it is<br />
consequently also at the origin <strong>of</strong> that contingent and changeable coagulation we call<br />
“matter”. A science that is called “exact” is in fact an “intelligence without wisdom”, just<br />
as post-scholastic philosophy is inversely a “wisdom without intelligence”. [LAW, Man<br />
in the Universe]<br />
To postulate a science without metaphysic is a flagrant contradiction, for without<br />
metaphysic there can be no standards and no criteria, no intelligence able to penetrate,<br />
contemplate and co-ordinate. [LAW, The Universality <strong>of</strong> Monasticism]<br />
Modern science, as it plunges dizzily downwards, its speed increasing in geometrical<br />
progression towards an a<strong>by</strong>ss into which it hurtles like a vehicle without brakes, is<br />
another example <strong>of</strong> that loss <strong>of</strong> the “spatial” equilibrium characteristic <strong>of</strong> contemplative<br />
and still stable civilizations. This criticism <strong>of</strong> modern science – and it is <strong>by</strong> no means the<br />
first ever to be made – is made not on the grounds that it studies some fragmentary field<br />
within the limits <strong>of</strong> its competence, but on the grounds that it claims to be in a position to<br />
attain to total knowledge, and that it ventures conclusions in fields accessible only to a<br />
supra-sensible and truly intellective wisdom, the existence <strong>of</strong> which it refuses on<br />
principle to admit. In other words, the foundations <strong>of</strong> modern science are false because,<br />
from the “subject” point <strong>of</strong> view, it replaces Intellect and Revelation <strong>by</strong> reason and<br />
experiment, as if it were not contradictory to lay claim to totality on an empirical basis;<br />
and its foundations are false too because, from the “object” point <strong>of</strong> view, it replaces the<br />
universal Substance <strong>by</strong> matter alone, either <strong>by</strong> denying the universal Principle or<br />
reducing it to matter or to some kind <strong>of</strong> pseudo-absolute from which all transcendence<br />
has been eliminated. [LAW, In the Wake <strong>of</strong> the Fall]<br />
Scientia Sacra: Scientia sacra or philosophia perennis, that universal gnosis which<br />
always has existed and always will exist. [UI, Foreword]<br />
Scientism: Scientism in fact is less interested in the real as such – which necessarily goes<br />
beyond our limitations – than in what is non-contradictory, therefore in what is logical, or<br />
more precisely, in what is empirically logical; thus in what is logical de facto according<br />
to a given experience, and not in what is logical de jure in accordance with the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
things . . .<br />
The fundamental contradiction <strong>of</strong> scientism is to want to explain the real without the help<br />
<strong>of</strong> that first science which is metaphysics, hence not to know that only the science <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Absolute gives meaning and discipline to the science <strong>of</strong> the relative; and not to know at<br />
the same stroke that the science <strong>of</strong> the relative, when it is deprived <strong>of</strong> this help, can only<br />
lead to suicide, beginning with that <strong>of</strong> the intelligence, then with that <strong>of</strong> the human, and<br />
in the end, with that <strong>of</strong> humanity. [FDH, To Refuse or To Accept Revelation]<br />
Scripture / Books: Important is the fact that the Scriptures are sacred, not because <strong>of</strong><br />
their subject matter and the way in which it is dealt with, but because <strong>of</strong> their degree <strong>of</strong><br />
inspiration, or what amounts to the same, their divine origin; it is this that determines the<br />
129