glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
enveloped Christ’s ascension. That is to say, our conception <strong>of</strong> the origin <strong>of</strong> mankind is<br />
based on the doctrine <strong>of</strong> the projection <strong>of</strong> the archetypes ab intra; thus our position is that<br />
<strong>of</strong> classical emanationism – in the Neoplatonic or gnostic sense <strong>of</strong> the term – which<br />
avoids the pitfall <strong>of</strong> anthropomorphism while agreeing with the theological conception <strong>of</strong><br />
creatio ex nihilo. [THC, Survey <strong>of</strong> Integral Anthropology]<br />
Man (primordial / fallen): Primordial man knew <strong>by</strong> himself that God is; fallen man does<br />
not know it; he must learn it. Primordial man was always aware <strong>of</strong> God; fallen man,<br />
while having learned that God is, must force himself to be aware <strong>of</strong> it always. Primordial<br />
man loved God more than the world; fallen man loves the world more than God, he must<br />
therefore practice renunciation. Primordial man saw God everywhere, he had the sense <strong>of</strong><br />
archetypes and <strong>of</strong> essences and was not enclosed in the alternative “flesh or spirit”; fallen<br />
man sees God nowhere, he sees only the world as such, not as the manifestation <strong>of</strong> God.<br />
[RHC, On Intelligence]<br />
Man (spiritual / worldly): The spiritual man is one who transcends himself and loves to<br />
transcend himself; the worldly man remains horizontal and detests the vertical dimension.<br />
[EPW, Sincerity: What it Is and What it Is Not]<br />
Man (supreme function): Something must be said about the priority <strong>of</strong> contemplation.<br />
As one knows, Islam defines this supreme function <strong>of</strong> man in the hadith about ihsan<br />
which orders man to “adore Allah as though thou didst see Him,” since “if thou dost not<br />
see Him, He nonetheless seeth thee.” Christianity, from its angle, calls first for total love<br />
<strong>of</strong> God and only after this for love <strong>of</strong> the neighbor; now it must be insisted, in the interest<br />
<strong>of</strong> the first love, that this second love could not be total because love <strong>of</strong> ourselves is not<br />
so; whether ego or alter, man is not God. In any case it follows from all traditional<br />
definitions <strong>of</strong> man’s supreme function that a man capable <strong>of</strong> contemplation has no right<br />
to neglect it but is on the contrary called to dedicate himself to it; in other words, he sins<br />
neither against God nor against his neighbor – to say the least – in following the example<br />
<strong>of</strong> Mary in the gospels and not that <strong>of</strong> Martha, for contemplation contains action and not<br />
the reverse. If in point <strong>of</strong> fact action can be opposed to contemplation, it is nevertheless<br />
not opposed to it in principle, nor is action called for beyond what is necessary or<br />
required <strong>by</strong> the duties <strong>of</strong> a man’s station in life. In abasing ourselves from humility, we<br />
must not also abase things which transcend us, for then our virtue loses all its value and<br />
meaning; to reduce spirituality to a “humble” utilitarianism – thus to a disguised<br />
materialism – is to give <strong>of</strong>fense to God, on the one hand because it is like saying it is not<br />
worthwhile to be overly preoccupied with God, and on the other hand because it means<br />
relegating the divine gift <strong>of</strong> intelligence to the rank <strong>of</strong> the superfluous. [UI, The Path]<br />
“Man <strong>of</strong> Faith” / “Man <strong>of</strong> Gnosis”: It is the difference between the believer, who in all<br />
things has in view moral and mystical efficacy to the point <strong>of</strong> sometimes needlessly<br />
violating the laws <strong>of</strong> thought, and the gnostic, who lives above all from principial<br />
certitudes and who is so made that these certitudes determine his behavior and contribute<br />
powerfully to his alchemical transformation. [SME, Confessional Speculation: Intentions<br />
and Impasses]<br />
85