05.01.2013 Views

glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis

glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis

glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Path is effort; if as intelligence, then the Path is discernment, concentration,<br />

contemplation. [UI, Islam]<br />

Stupidity: Stupidity is the inability to discern the essential from the accidental: it consists<br />

in attaching oneself to mere facts and in considering them simply in themselves, that is,<br />

without the least induction. [EH, Transgression and Purification]<br />

It is not without reason that popular opinion tends to associate pride with stupidity. One<br />

can in fact be pretentious through stupidity just as one can be stupid through pretension;<br />

the two things go together. Of course, lack <strong>of</strong> intelligence does not necessarily lead to<br />

pretension, but pretension cannot avoid harming the intelligence. And if, as is commonly<br />

admitted, stupidity is the incapacity to discern between the essential and the secondary, or<br />

between cause and effect, it includes for that very reason a measure <strong>of</strong> pride; a stupidity<br />

combined with a perfect humility and a perfect detachment would no longer be stupidity,<br />

it would be a simplicity <strong>of</strong> mind which could trouble no intelligent and virtuous person.<br />

[SME, Passion and Pride]<br />

Let us specify that stupidity <strong>of</strong>ten manifests itself through confusion between a material<br />

cause and a moral cause, or between a phenomenon due to circumstances and another<br />

resulting from a fundamental quality, in short, between an “accident” and a “substance”;<br />

for example, a government is taken for a people, or a collective psychosis for an ethnic<br />

character. [THC, Intelligence and Character]<br />

Subconscious: The subconscious covers all where<strong>of</strong> we have no consciousness in an<br />

actual fashion, be it a matter <strong>of</strong> higher realities or <strong>of</strong> psychic complexes; but in fact, what<br />

people ordinarily understand <strong>by</strong> “subconscious” is merely the inferior psychism, as is<br />

moreover consistent with its etymology whenever sub is opposed to super or supra. If the<br />

word “infra-conscious” were a current term, it should serve to indicate, not that <strong>of</strong> which<br />

we are only faintly conscious, but rather that which is little endowed with consciousness.<br />

[TB, The Question <strong>of</strong> Illusion]<br />

Subconscious (spiritual): The idea <strong>of</strong> the subconscious is susceptible, not only <strong>of</strong> a<br />

psychological and lower interpretation, but also <strong>of</strong> a spiritual, higher, and consequently<br />

purely qualitative interpretation. It is true that in this case one should speak <strong>of</strong> the “supraconscious”<br />

but the fact is that the supra-conscious has also an aspect that is<br />

“subterranean” in relation to our ordinary consciousness, just as the heart resembles a<br />

submerged sanctuary which, symbolically speaking, reappears on the surface thanks to<br />

unitive realization; it is this subterranean aspect that allows us to speak – in a provisional<br />

way – <strong>of</strong> a “spiritual subconscious,” which must never at any time be taken to mean the<br />

lower, vital psyche, the passive and chaotic dreaming <strong>of</strong> individuals and collectivities.<br />

[UI, The Path]<br />

Subject / Object: As for the categories “subject” and “object,” we shall begin <strong>by</strong> taking<br />

note <strong>of</strong> the fact that the object is reality in itself, or reality envisaged in connection with<br />

its perceptibility, whereas the subject is consciousness in itself, or consciousness<br />

envisaged in relation to its faculty <strong>of</strong> perception. In both cases there is a relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

reciprocity and a relationship <strong>of</strong> divergence: with respect to the first, we would say that<br />

the world ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it is a perception is part <strong>of</strong> the subject, which perceives it; inversely<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!