glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Path is effort; if as intelligence, then the Path is discernment, concentration,<br />
contemplation. [UI, Islam]<br />
Stupidity: Stupidity is the inability to discern the essential from the accidental: it consists<br />
in attaching oneself to mere facts and in considering them simply in themselves, that is,<br />
without the least induction. [EH, Transgression and Purification]<br />
It is not without reason that popular opinion tends to associate pride with stupidity. One<br />
can in fact be pretentious through stupidity just as one can be stupid through pretension;<br />
the two things go together. Of course, lack <strong>of</strong> intelligence does not necessarily lead to<br />
pretension, but pretension cannot avoid harming the intelligence. And if, as is commonly<br />
admitted, stupidity is the incapacity to discern between the essential and the secondary, or<br />
between cause and effect, it includes for that very reason a measure <strong>of</strong> pride; a stupidity<br />
combined with a perfect humility and a perfect detachment would no longer be stupidity,<br />
it would be a simplicity <strong>of</strong> mind which could trouble no intelligent and virtuous person.<br />
[SME, Passion and Pride]<br />
Let us specify that stupidity <strong>of</strong>ten manifests itself through confusion between a material<br />
cause and a moral cause, or between a phenomenon due to circumstances and another<br />
resulting from a fundamental quality, in short, between an “accident” and a “substance”;<br />
for example, a government is taken for a people, or a collective psychosis for an ethnic<br />
character. [THC, Intelligence and Character]<br />
Subconscious: The subconscious covers all where<strong>of</strong> we have no consciousness in an<br />
actual fashion, be it a matter <strong>of</strong> higher realities or <strong>of</strong> psychic complexes; but in fact, what<br />
people ordinarily understand <strong>by</strong> “subconscious” is merely the inferior psychism, as is<br />
moreover consistent with its etymology whenever sub is opposed to super or supra. If the<br />
word “infra-conscious” were a current term, it should serve to indicate, not that <strong>of</strong> which<br />
we are only faintly conscious, but rather that which is little endowed with consciousness.<br />
[TB, The Question <strong>of</strong> Illusion]<br />
Subconscious (spiritual): The idea <strong>of</strong> the subconscious is susceptible, not only <strong>of</strong> a<br />
psychological and lower interpretation, but also <strong>of</strong> a spiritual, higher, and consequently<br />
purely qualitative interpretation. It is true that in this case one should speak <strong>of</strong> the “supraconscious”<br />
but the fact is that the supra-conscious has also an aspect that is<br />
“subterranean” in relation to our ordinary consciousness, just as the heart resembles a<br />
submerged sanctuary which, symbolically speaking, reappears on the surface thanks to<br />
unitive realization; it is this subterranean aspect that allows us to speak – in a provisional<br />
way – <strong>of</strong> a “spiritual subconscious,” which must never at any time be taken to mean the<br />
lower, vital psyche, the passive and chaotic dreaming <strong>of</strong> individuals and collectivities.<br />
[UI, The Path]<br />
Subject / Object: As for the categories “subject” and “object,” we shall begin <strong>by</strong> taking<br />
note <strong>of</strong> the fact that the object is reality in itself, or reality envisaged in connection with<br />
its perceptibility, whereas the subject is consciousness in itself, or consciousness<br />
envisaged in relation to its faculty <strong>of</strong> perception. In both cases there is a relationship <strong>of</strong><br />
reciprocity and a relationship <strong>of</strong> divergence: with respect to the first, we would say that<br />
the world ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it is a perception is part <strong>of</strong> the subject, which perceives it; inversely<br />
139