05.01.2013 Views

glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis

glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis

glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

truths well enough in theory, has nonetheless a disproportionate approach to them, an<br />

approach that is unaccompanied <strong>by</strong> a sufficient adaptation <strong>of</strong> the soul; not that such<br />

thought is pr<strong>of</strong>ane <strong>by</strong> definition as in the case <strong>of</strong> ignorant thought, but it is so secondarily<br />

or morally and lies in grave danger <strong>of</strong> error, for man is not merely a mirror, he is a<br />

cosmos which is both complex and fragile. [LT, Understanding and Believing]<br />

Time: Time is but a spiroidal movement around a motionless Center. [LAW, Religio<br />

<strong>Perennis</strong>]<br />

Time (concrete / abstract): Concrete time is the changing <strong>of</strong> phenomena; abstract time<br />

is the duration which this change renders measurable. [FDH, Structure and Universality<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Conditions <strong>of</strong> Existence]<br />

Time (objective / subjective): Objective time is so to speak a spiroidal movement<br />

comprising four phases, and this movement is qualitatively ascending or descending,<br />

according to what the period <strong>of</strong> the full cycle requires; this is to say that time is like a<br />

wheel that turns, this rotation being itself submitted to a greater rotation, exactly as the<br />

rotation <strong>of</strong> the earth is inscribed in the rotation <strong>of</strong> the planet around the sun. As for<br />

subjective time, the definition <strong>of</strong> which is just as elementary as that <strong>of</strong> the corresponding<br />

space, it is divided into present, past and future: what we are, what we were and what we<br />

will be, and in addition, what our surroundings are, were and will be. [FDH, Structure<br />

and Universality <strong>of</strong> the Conditions <strong>of</strong> Existence]<br />

Tradition / Science: Tradition speaks to each man the language he can understand,<br />

provided he be willing to listen; this reservation is essential, for tradition, we repeat,<br />

cannot become bankrupt; it is rather <strong>of</strong> man’s bankruptcy that one should speak, for it is<br />

he who has lost the intuition <strong>of</strong> the supernatural and the sense <strong>of</strong> the sacred. Man has<br />

allowed himself to be seduced <strong>by</strong> the discoveries and inventions <strong>of</strong> an illegitimately<br />

totalitarian science; that is, a science which does not recognize its own limits and for that<br />

reason is unaware <strong>of</strong> what lies beyond them. Fascinated <strong>by</strong> scientific phenomena as well<br />

as <strong>by</strong> the erroneous conclusions he draws from them, man has ended up being submerged<br />

<strong>by</strong> his own creations; he is not ready to realize that a traditional message is situated on an<br />

altogether different level, and how much more real this level is. Men let themselves be<br />

dazzled all the more easily since scientism gives them all the excuses they want to justify<br />

their attachment to the world <strong>of</strong> appearances and thus also their flight before the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Absolute in any form. [PM, No Initiative without Truth]<br />

Traditional: That is “traditional” which is transmitted from a divine source. [FDH, The<br />

Sense <strong>of</strong> the Sacred]<br />

Traditionalism: “Traditionalism”, like “esoterism,” . . . has nothing pejorative about it in<br />

itself and one might even say that it is less open to argument and a far broader term, in<br />

any case, than the latter; in fact, however, with a particularly reprehensible arbitrariness it<br />

has been associated with an idea which inevitably devalues its meaning, namely the idea<br />

<strong>of</strong> “nostalgia for the past”; it is hardly credible that such an idiotic and dishonest<br />

circumlocution should be freely resorted to as an argument against strictly doctrinal<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!