glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
world which is its medium <strong>of</strong> manifestation and finally the Universe <strong>of</strong> which this world<br />
represents but a minute fragment. [TB, Cosmological and Eschatological Viewpoints]<br />
Creatio ex nihilo: One must not tire <strong>of</strong> affirming it: the origin <strong>of</strong> a creature is not a<br />
material substance, it is a perfect and non-material archetype: perfect and consequently<br />
without any need <strong>of</strong> a transforming evolution; non-material and consequently having its<br />
origin in the Spirit, and not in matter. Assuredly, there is a trajectory; this starts not from<br />
an inert and unconscious substance, but proceeds from the Spirit – the matrix <strong>of</strong> all<br />
possibilities – to the earthly result, the creature; a result which sprang forth from the<br />
invisible at a cyclic moment when the physical world was still far less separate from the<br />
psychic world than in later and progressively “hardened” periods. When one speaks<br />
traditionally <strong>of</strong> creatio ex nihilo, one means there<strong>by</strong>, on the one hand, that creatures do<br />
not derive from a pre-existing matter and, on the other hand, that the “incarnation” <strong>of</strong><br />
possibilities cannot in any way affect the immutable Plenitude <strong>of</strong> the Principle. [FDH,<br />
Aspects <strong>of</strong> the Theophanic Phenomenon <strong>of</strong> Consciousness]<br />
In the expression creatio ex nihilo, the word nihil determines the meaning <strong>of</strong> the word ex:<br />
thus ex does not presuppose a substance or a container as is normally the case, it simply<br />
indicates the possibility in principle – which possibility is denied precisely <strong>by</strong> the word<br />
nihil in regard to creation – rather as the word “with” indicates a possible object even in<br />
the expression “with nothing,” which in fact means “without object.” Hence there is no<br />
point in blaming the theological formula in question for suggesting an extra-divine<br />
substance and there<strong>by</strong> a fundamental dualism; that would amount to playing with words<br />
and taking too seriously the small fatalities <strong>of</strong> language.<br />
Obviously, creation “comes from” – that is the meaning <strong>of</strong> the word ex – an origin; not<br />
from a cosmic, hence “created” substance, but from a reality pertaining to the Creator,<br />
and in this sense – and in this sense only – it can be said that creation is situated in God.<br />
It is situated in Him in respect <strong>of</strong> ontological immanence: everything in fact “contains”<br />
on pain <strong>of</strong> being non-existent – on the one hand Being, and on the other a given<br />
Archetype or “Idea”; the divine “content” is ipso facto also the “container,” and even is<br />
so a priori, since God is Reality as such. But things are “outside God” – all sacred<br />
Scriptures attest to this – in respect <strong>of</strong> contingency, hence in respect <strong>of</strong> the concrete<br />
phenomena <strong>of</strong> the world. [PM, Ex Nihilo, In Deo]<br />
Ex nihilo may mean: “out <strong>of</strong> nothing which could be external to God”; but this meaning<br />
is strictly esoteric because it presupposes the understanding <strong>of</strong> the doctrine <strong>of</strong> All-<br />
Possibility, hence that <strong>of</strong> the homogeneity <strong>of</strong> the possible. [EH, Theological and<br />
Metaphysical Ambiguity <strong>of</strong> the Word Ex]<br />
Creation: Creation is the great “objectification” <strong>of</strong> the Divine Subject; it is the divine<br />
manifestation par excellence. It has a beginning and an end ins<strong>of</strong>ar as a particular cycle is<br />
envisaged, but it is in itself a permanent divine possibility, a metaphysically necessary<br />
objectification <strong>of</strong> the divine infinity; to deny the necessity <strong>of</strong> the creation would amount<br />
to attributing arbitrariness to the Divinity . . . Creation is perfect <strong>by</strong> its very oneness and<br />
totality, it reabsorbs in its perfections all partial disequilibria. [SW, Manifestations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Divine Principle]<br />
23