glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
glossary of terms used by frithjof schuon - Sophia Perennis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
intellectual or heart knowledge, the principial realities grasped <strong>by</strong> the heart are<br />
themselves prolonged in intellection; heart knowledge is one with what it knows, it is like<br />
an uninterrupted ray <strong>of</strong> light . . . Apart from these two modes there is a third, and this is<br />
the knowledge <strong>of</strong> faith. Faith amounts to an objectivized heart knowledge; what the<br />
microcosmic heart does not tell us, the macrocosmic heart – the Logos – tells us in a<br />
symbolic and partial language, and this for two reasons: to inform us concerning that <strong>of</strong><br />
which our soul is urgently in need, and to awaken in us as far as possible the<br />
remembrance <strong>of</strong> innate truths.<br />
If there is an intrinsically direct knowledge, which nevertheless is extrinsically<br />
objectivized as to its communication, there must correlatively be a knowledge which in<br />
itself is indirect, but which nevertheless is subjective as to its operation, and this is the<br />
discernment <strong>of</strong> objective things from the starting point <strong>of</strong> their subjective equivalents,<br />
given that reality is one; for there is nothing in the macrocosm that does not derive from<br />
the metacosm and which is not to be found again in the microcosm.<br />
Direct and inward knowledge, that <strong>of</strong> the Heart-Intellect, is what the Greeks called<br />
gnosis; the word “esoterism” – according to its etymology – signifies gnosis inasmuch as<br />
it de facto underlies the religious, and thus dogmatic doctrines. [EPW, Understanding<br />
Esoterism]<br />
Knowledge (<strong>of</strong> the relative / absolute): In reality, knowledge <strong>of</strong> the contingent and the<br />
relative is necessarily contingent and relative; not in the sense that it would not be<br />
adequate – because adequacy is the very nature <strong>of</strong> knowledge – but in the sense that we<br />
can only perceive one aspect <strong>of</strong> the object at a time, and this depends on our standpoint,<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the subject, precisely. Only knowledge <strong>of</strong> the Absolute is absolute, and it is so<br />
because, in gnosis, the Absolute knows itself in the depths <strong>of</strong> the human subject; this is<br />
the whole mystery <strong>of</strong> divine immanence in the microcosm. [THC, Universal Categories]<br />
Knowledge (principial) / Rationalism: It is worth recalling here that in metaphysics<br />
there is no empiricism: principial knowledge cannot stem from any experience, even<br />
though experiences – scientific or other – can be the occasional causes <strong>of</strong> the intellect’s<br />
intuitions. The sources <strong>of</strong> our transcendent intuitions are innate data, consubstantial with<br />
pure intelligence, but de facto “forgotten” since the “loss <strong>of</strong> Paradise”; thus principial<br />
knowledge, according to Plato, is nothing other than a “recollection,” and this is a gift,<br />
most <strong>of</strong>ten actualized <strong>by</strong> intellectual and spiritual disciplines, Deo juvante.<br />
Rationalism, taken in its broadest sense, is the very negation <strong>of</strong> Platonic anamnesis; it<br />
consists in seeking the elements <strong>of</strong> certitudes in phenomena rather than in our very being.<br />
[RHC, Preface]<br />
Liberty: Liberty . . . is limited to the extent that it is relative, but it is really liberty in so<br />
far as it is liberty and not something else. [LT, Rationalism, Real and Apparent]<br />
What then is liberty considered independently <strong>of</strong> free creatures, or <strong>of</strong> the particular case<br />
<strong>of</strong> a free creature? It is the consciousness <strong>of</strong> an unlimited diversity <strong>of</strong> possibilities, and<br />
this consciousness is an aspect <strong>of</strong> Being itself. To those who maintain that only a given<br />
experience <strong>of</strong> liberty such as that <strong>of</strong> a bird is concrete, and not liberty in itself (which in<br />
their view is no more than a purely mental abstraction), the reply must be made, without<br />
it being necessary to deny the existence <strong>of</strong> abstraction in the reason, that liberty in itself is<br />
77