08.01.2013 Views

Sugarcane ethanol: Contributions to climate change - BAFF

Sugarcane ethanol: Contributions to climate change - BAFF

Sugarcane ethanol: Contributions to climate change - BAFF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.1. Effects on the supply side<br />

Why are current food prices so high?<br />

As mentioned above the variation of yields due <strong>to</strong> climatic conditions, the development of<br />

input prices – fertilizer, diesel and pesticides – as well as the level of political support are<br />

the main drivers of supply. �e following items provide some information on these points<br />

(Figure 8):<br />

• Poor harvests in Australia, Ukraine and Europe for wheat and barley. According <strong>to</strong><br />

FAO statistics, these three regions contributed on average 51% of <strong>to</strong>tal world barley<br />

production and 27% of <strong>to</strong>tal world wheat production for the period 2005-2006.<br />

• Lower harvests in wheat and barley are more than compensated by a bumper harvest<br />

for maize worldwide.<br />

– �erefore, world cereal production increased in <strong>to</strong>tal even in 2007.<br />

– �e bumper harvest in maize kept maize prices low and the wheat-maize spread<br />

increased signi�cantly (Figure 3).<br />

– Only recently have maize prices also strongly increased.<br />

• Higher energy prices lead <strong>to</strong> higher food prices as costs (e.g. fertilizer, processing, and<br />

transport) increase. Higher transport costs induce higher price e�ects as distances<br />

increase.<br />

• CAP policies such as manda<strong>to</strong>ry set-aside regulation or production quota restrained<br />

supply. Furthermore, there was a <strong>change</strong> from price <strong>to</strong> income support and compensa<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

payments became decoupled, set aside was introduced and export subsidies were<br />

diminished. Some of these measures limited supply within the EU. However, the general<br />

aim of the last CAP reforms was an enforcement of farmers’ ability <strong>to</strong> react <strong>to</strong> market<br />

signals instead of following policy signals given by market price support. Measures<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

-0.2<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.6<br />

-0.8<br />

-1.0<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Australia Canada EU (27) US<br />

Figure 8. Deviation from trend in yields (wheat and coarse grains) in <strong>to</strong>ns/ha. Source: OECD-FAO<br />

Agricultural Outlook 2008-2017 (2008).<br />

<strong>Sugarcane</strong> <strong>ethanol</strong> 233

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!