ComputerAided_Design_Engineering_amp_Manufactur.pdf
ComputerAided_Design_Engineering_amp_Manufactur.pdf
ComputerAided_Design_Engineering_amp_Manufactur.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Informal Training<br />
Informal CAD training encompasses most methods of transferring CAD system information within the<br />
actual work setting. For the purposes of this study, informal methods might include apprenticeships,<br />
tutorials, and location of knowledgeable and untrained workers in the same work area. Information<br />
transfer and learning can also take place during casual conversations.<br />
Successful CAD Training<br />
The success of any training program is ultimately dependent on user satisfaction with the system after<br />
the training is complete. Some (e.g., Adler2)<br />
have used financial measurements to calibrate the success<br />
of the CAD system. Although financial performance may be a valid success indicator, it can be highly<br />
susceptible to variations in the complexity and price of the components to be designed with CAD.<br />
Although this research was limited to only one type of CAD system (i.e., PCB design and layout), the<br />
pilot study revealed that differences in board complexity presented questions regarding the validity of<br />
comparisons of financial benefits. Furthermore, several of the younger firms had no basis upon which<br />
to compare the financial benefits reaped from the adoption of the CAD system; they had purchased their<br />
systems when the firm was founded.<br />
Thus, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes the successful adoption of a technology. For<br />
the purpose of this study, successful CAD training was used synonymously with perceived satisfaction<br />
with the system. In addition, the extent to which the de-skilling process was used in the firm became a<br />
surrogate measure of the relative success of the training program. The presence of de-skilling was<br />
determined through open-ended interview questions. A firm was then classified as having allowed for<br />
de-skilling if they had at least one worker who had no previous design experience and was now using<br />
the CAD system.<br />
6.4 Findings<br />
In total, three of the firms observed were classified as mechanistic (based on the physical presence<br />
of management, level of control, and the role of the worker in CAD decision making processes),<br />
while five were classified as organic. Given the complex and dynamic competitive environment in<br />
both the electronics and telecommunications industries, it was not surprising that the organic<br />
structure was the predominant organizational form because organic structures tend to adapt better<br />
to unstable competitive environments. In total, five of the firms in the study exclusively used informal<br />
training methods, such as co-location, tutorials, and apprenticeships; two firms relied exclusively on<br />
formal instruction in a classroom setting, while the remaining firm used a combination of both<br />
methods. Six of the firms had achieved work de-skilling benefits, while two had not (see Tables 6.2<br />
and 6.3).<br />
The outcome of this analysis yielded a number of interesting observations. The first finding is the<br />
difference between the use of formal and informal training in mechanistic and organic firms. As can<br />
be seen, organic firms used more informal training methods, while mechanistic firms used formal<br />
techniques. Although this finding sounds trivial, it is not clear whether this is a true cause-effect<br />
relationship. In many cases, financial implications played a major role in the selection of the training<br />
method. Also, as previously noted, formal training methods have long been the predominant form of<br />
CAD training. Thus, both cost and competitive pressures may have created a situation in which the<br />
s<strong>amp</strong>le firms chose CAD training using informal methods.<br />
Certain benefits were also associated with specific types of training programs. Table 6.3 displays the<br />
cross tabulation showing the relationship between the training method and the de-skilling process. Firms<br />
were classified as taking advantage of the de-skilling process if they had successfully trained one or more<br />
workers from a non-design related background to use the CAD system. Table 6.3 suggests that firms with<br />
informal training are able to take advantage of the de-skilling process. They can potentially gain financial