ComputerAided_Design_Engineering_amp_Manufactur.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. The fourth task is to optimize the entire operation by selecting optimal sequences for the measurements in each setup and to generate optimal and collision-free paths for the probe. 5. The final task is to synthesize the plan and generate the inspection program in a neutral programming language such as DMIS for the CMM. A framework for the computer-aided inspection planning system for the CMM (CAIPS-CMM) is shown in Figure 2.22. The input to the CAIPS-CMM is a product model that carries features, solids and GD&T information. The output of the system is the CMM inspection program in DMIS format. FIGURE 2.22 Flowchart showing the framework of the CAIPS-CMM. © 2001 by CRC Press LLC
Product Model Representation for Computer-Aided Measurement The product design representation for a part must carry enough information and be structured such that it is amenable for computer interpretation for automated inspection planning. Three levels of information are required: • Geometrical information pertaining to shape, volume, and surfaces. Such information is required for visualization of the part model, extraction of surface data for measurement, accessibility analysis of contact probes, and path planning for inspection on the CMM. • Measurement evaluation as defined by the GD&T specifications. • High-level engineering information pertaining to shape or region on the part. Usually such regions are linked to specific manufacturing or measurement processes. It is quite established at this stage that a solid modeling scheme is capable of providing complete and unambiguous representation for the above purpose. There are many solid representation schemes available such as constructive solid geometry (CSG) and boundary representation (BREP). In CSG, solids are represented by a collection of geometric primitives, such as box, cylinder, wedges, etc., associated together through a binary tree. The nodes of the tree represent Boolean operations such as union, intersection, difference, and rigid transformation, while the leaves of the tree represent the primitives. CSG models represent the volume of the objects very well but do not explicitly store the edge information that most CAD applications require. Representation and evaluation of complex surfaces are the problem areas for the CSG model. BREP models store information about the surfaces, curves, and points that form the boundary of the object. Since surface information is well known, direct manipulation of the surfaces is possible for applications in path planning and digitizing surface points in CMM planning. BREP models tend to be very difficult to create compared to CSG and their data files tend to be very big. Hence, it is common to find that many commercial packages have CSG as a means to create the model, but the actual model is evaluated in terms of BREP. The second level of information required for CAIPS-CMM is the GD&T specifications. The specifications will help to determine the CMM evaluation functions to be applied to geometric elements that are measured. For ex<strong>amp</strong>le, a circularity tolerance specification for a cylinder element will only require a circle evaluation function, whereas a cylindricity tolerance specification will require a cylinder evaluation function. Most CAD/CAM systems do not have a consistent approach for linking the GD&T information to the product model. Some systems allow for the GD&T specifications to be added as descriptive notes associated with certain geometry, while others allow for the GD&T specifications to be integral to the CAD model. A product model that is created based purely on geometrical information has little engineering significance in terms of engineering analysis and planning for manufacturing and inspection. A feature-based modeling technique has been developed to provide a more natural interface between the designer and other engineering applications such as process planning. A feature can essentially be defined as a frame of information organized such that tasks like planning for manufacture and inspection can be carried out more easily. From this definition, it can be seen that many different features can be defined based on the different applications as different shape and engineering knowledge are required. For ex<strong>amp</strong>le, a machinable feature is mappable to a generic shape that has engineering significance in terms of machining, while a technological feature contains non-geometric attributes related to function and performance of an entity in the feature-based model. Features are likened to the basic building blocks for a product model and it is quite apparent that more than one type of feature is required. A more extensive review on features for design and manufacture can be found in Shah. 53 It should be emphasized that feature-based modeling alone is not sufficient for engineering applications as geometric reasoning and processing still have to be carried out using solid model information. Hence it is quite important to have a hybrid system that has both solid (usually BREP) and feature information. © 2001 by CRC Press LLC
Page 1 and 2:
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, ENGINEERING,
Page 3 and 4:
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-P
Page 5 and 6:
Editor Cornelius T. Leondes, B.S.,
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapt
Page 9 and 10:
the implementation of the IPD syste
Page 11 and 12:
In our IPD system implementations,
Page 13 and 14:
2. Specification of analysis-specif
Page 15 and 16:
FIGURE 1.2 base or the design insta
Page 17 and 18:
FIGURE 1.4 System architecture of t
Page 19 and 20: of a beam is considered for FEA. Th
Page 21 and 22: FIGURE 1.7 through the control expe
Page 23 and 24: 2. machining facility (e.g., gang m
Page 25 and 26: from the FBDS. The user also specif
Page 27 and 28: Depending on the type of feature to
Page 29 and 30: TABLE 1.6 Tolerance synthesis is de
Page 31 and 32: FIGURE 1.12 Display of the NC tool
Page 33 and 34: component geometric entities and va
Page 35 and 36: FIGURE 1.14 The system architecture
Page 37 and 38: TABLE 1.10 User Input for the Toler
Page 39 and 40: TABLE 1.11 Tolerance Specifications
Page 41 and 42: 7. Z. Young and I. R. Groose. A rul
Page 43 and 44: FIGURE 2.1 Tool paths generated for
Page 45 and 46: FIGURE 2.2 sented by instances of f
Page 47 and 48: TABLE 2.1 A CAD-Generated Hole Conf
Page 49 and 50: FIGURE 2.6 mounted on the rotary ta
Page 51 and 52: FIGURE 2.8 fixture for the machinin
Page 53 and 54: FIGURE 2.10 or best-fit, or the cur
Page 55 and 56: FIGURE 2.11 Linear approximation of
Page 57 and 58: FIGURE 2.13 Circular approximation
Page 59 and 60: FIGURE 2.14(b) Circular approximati
Page 61 and 62: FIGURE 2.16 Types of biarcs. FIGURE
Page 63 and 64: FIGURE 2.18 Approximation of scanne
Page 65 and 66: FIGURE 2.20 A touch trigger probe c
Page 67 and 68: TABLE 2.4 Substitute Elements in CM
Page 69: FIGURE 2.21 CMM planning requiremen
Page 73 and 74: © 2001 by CRC Press LLC TABLE 2.5
Page 75 and 76: TABLE 2.7 Partial Listing of Dimens
Page 77 and 78: 24. Makinouchi, S., Okamoto, M., an
Page 79 and 80: Bijan Shirinzadeh Monash University
Page 81 and 82: FIGURE 3.1 Trends in flexible manuf
Page 83 and 84: FIGURE 3.3 and constrain different
Page 85 and 86: Other Fixturing Techniques There ar
Page 87 and 88: FIGURE 3.6 contact point. The geome
Page 89 and 90: FIGURE 3.8 The vertical support fix
Page 91 and 92: and moments about the contact point
Page 93 and 94: een identified, the normals are use
Page 95 and 96: one of choosing the variables: such
Page 97 and 98: Fixture Module Location An importan
Page 99 and 100: FIGURE 3.15 Illustration of functio
Page 101 and 102: FIGURE 3.18 Minimum separation test
Page 103 and 104: direction) the face, respectively.
Page 105 and 106: FIGURE 3.21 Software structure for
Page 107 and 108: 3.8 Conclusion A reconfigurable fix
Page 109 and 110: Heui Jae Pahk Seoul National Univer
Page 111 and 112: FIGURE 4.1(b) Conceptual framework
Page 113 and 114: 4.3 Measurement Points Sampling and
Page 115 and 116: Surface S2 Measurement Path FIGURE
Page 117 and 118: FIGURE 4.4 Rough phase alignment ba
Page 119 and 120: deviation between the nominal CAD d
Page 121 and 122:
FIGURE 4.6(a) Sum of squares distan
Page 123 and 124:
FIGURE 4.7(c) Trailing edge. (c) th
Page 125 and 126:
FIGURE 4.8(a) Profile tolerance of
Page 127 and 128:
The calculated minimum form error i
Page 129 and 130:
FIGURE 4.11(a) A typical mold havin
Page 131 and 132:
FIGURE 4.11(d) Inspection results f
Page 133 and 134:
FIGURE 4.12(c) Maximum deviation (p
Page 135 and 136:
5.1 Introduction Developments in th
Page 137 and 138:
process plan for a part (Figure 5.3
Page 139 and 140:
FIGURE 5.5 leading to the developme
Page 141 and 142:
the previously stored process plan
Page 143 and 144:
FIGURE 5.7 Techniques of defining a
Page 145 and 146:
Feature Recognition and Extraction
Page 147 and 148:
in relation to another feature (e.g
Page 149 and 150:
FIGURE 5.9 Framework for building a
Page 151 and 152:
FIGURE 5.10 Process plan content.
Page 153 and 154:
FIGURE 5.12 Schematic sketch of the
Page 155 and 156:
Several techniques of defining a fe
Page 157 and 158:
TABLE 5.1 Data Structure for Repres
Page 159 and 160:
FIGURE 5.16 Classification of the t
Page 161 and 162:
system to ensure that the part bein
Page 163 and 164:
FIGURE 5.19 Graphical model of the
Page 165 and 166:
TABLE 5.4 Data Structure for Repres
Page 167 and 168:
FIGURE 5.20 Mapping between machini
Page 169 and 170:
algorithms. (Some details of the pr
Page 171 and 172:
FIGURE 5.24 An example rotational p
Page 173 and 174:
FIGURE 5.26 Down_face-turn-up_face
Page 175 and 176:
FIGURE 5.27 Procedure for machine t
Page 177 and 178:
FIGURE 5.28 Determining the number
Page 179 and 180:
DL is needed to be set only if the
Page 181 and 182:
FIGURE 5.31 Operation sequencing co
Page 183 and 184:
Cutting Tool Selection Selection of
Page 185 and 186:
1. A tool is searched for in the da
Page 187 and 188:
FIGURE 5.32 Inputs to optimization
Page 189 and 190:
When these values are substituted,
Page 191 and 192:
Usually, maximum and minimum speed
Page 193 and 194:
FIGURE 5.33 Solution methodology.
Page 195 and 196:
TABLE 5.6 Process Plan Internal Rep
Page 197 and 198:
In a strict theoretical perspective
Page 199 and 200:
18. Domazet, D. S. and Lu, S. C. Y,
Page 201 and 202:
63. Prasad, A. V. S. R. K., Rao, P.
Page 203 and 204:
CAD systems. The sample consists of
Page 205 and 206:
learn to master the new system. An
Page 207 and 208:
Although researchers appear to agre
Page 209 and 210:
Link and Zmud28 found that organic
Page 211 and 212:
Informal Training Informal CAD trai
Page 213 and 214:
informal training programs, felt th
Page 215 and 216:
6. C. A. Beatty, Tall Tales and Rea
Page 217 and 218:
A.Y.C. Nee National University of S
Page 219 and 220:
FIGURE 7.1 Planning, design, and ma
Page 221 and 222:
A metal stamping can have the follo
Page 223 and 224:
FIGURE 7.3 Strips used to notch out
Page 225 and 226:
A Skeletal Approach for the Recogni
Page 227 and 228:
These findings can be used to devel
Page 229 and 230:
Semi-Direct Piloting In cases where
Page 231 and 232:
a larger value, the die operations
Page 233 and 234:
FIGURE 7.9 Symbolic relationship be
Page 235 and 236:
FIGURE 7.11 The shape of the envelo
Page 237 and 238:
TABLE 7.1 Schema for the Generation
Page 239 and 240:
strong reasons to support a move to
Page 241 and 242:
FIGURE 7.16 3-D CAD model of a part
Page 243 and 244:
References Cheok, B.T. et al. (1994
Page 245 and 246:
include the once forbidden generati
Page 247 and 248:
A temporal matrix (T-Matrix) is pro
Page 249 and 250:
FIGURE 8.1 A basic process. (From R
Page 251 and 252:
FIGURE 8.4(a) Generate a new IG usi
Page 253 and 254:
Note if the pair of nodes are both
Page 255 and 256:
TABLE 8.1 Summary of the Rules Cond
Page 257 and 258:
The correctness of these rules is e
Page 259 and 260:
needs to show that after each full
Page 261 and 262:
ule is violated, a warning should b
Page 263 and 264:
Π1 Π3 Π4 FIGURE 8.8(a) After add
Page 265 and 266:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 267 and 268:
A ik � ‘U’ and is in a cycle
Page 269 and 270:
FIGURE 8.12(a) Add [p2 t7 p7 t8 p4]
Page 271 and 272:
FIGURE 8.12(c) Add a token to p8 vi
Page 273 and 274:
FIGURE 8.12(e) Add [p8 t9 p14 t10 p
Page 275 and 276:
FIGURE 8.13 An example of rule TT.0
Page 277 and 278:
FIGURE 8.14 A GPN model of a machin
Page 279 and 280:
FIGURE 8.15(b) The first exclusive
Page 281 and 282:
FIGURE 8.15(d) The last exclusive T
Page 283 and 284:
FIGURE 8.15(f) After entering the a
Page 285 and 286:
FIGURE 8.15(h) Completion of Compon
Page 287 and 288:
FIGURE 8.15(j) Two PP-generations:
Page 289 and 290:
FIGURE 8.15(l) The last exclusive T
Page 291 and 292:
t1 t5 p1 p5 t6 (a) t2 t3 t4 2 2 p2
Page 293 and 294:
FIGURE 8.17 An example of partial f
Page 295 and 296:
Theorem 10: If pi → pk in a synth
Page 297 and 298:
Note that control transitions are o
Page 299 and 300:
t j than the lower at , it indicate
Page 301 and 302:
• Programming logic and VLSI arra
Page 303 and 304:
7. Chao, D. Y. and D. T. Wang, Appl
Page 305 and 306:
53. Villaroel, J. L., J. Martinez,
Page 307 and 308:
q u : the numerator of the least ra
Page 309 and 310:
geometric modeling, engineering ana
Page 311 and 312:
In dimension driven or parametric d
Page 313 and 314:
FIGURE 9.3 configuration of bodies
Page 315 and 316:
FIGURE 9.6 FIGURE 9.7 Geometric Int
Page 317 and 318:
FIGURE 9.8 Intersection of degrees
Page 319 and 320:
will introduce a way to propagate p
Page 321 and 322:
Completeness of Dimensions Complete
Page 323 and 324:
FIGURE 9.12 3-D constraints. © 200
Page 325 and 326:
The distance constraint from pt �
Page 327 and 328:
therefore: Now merge the lists and
Page 329 and 330:
Quantity analysis methods have the
Page 331 and 332:
y a revolute joint. By selecting al
show all

ComputerAided_Design_Engineering_amp_Manufactur.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?